Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Totally agreed. If they were genuinely interested in her as a future dentist and wanted to interview her, they might have suggested her to re-take her DAT with a minimum score dictating her final acceptance. It has nothing do with with elitism - it has everything to do with ethics. It's bad ethics for a school to admit someone who is less likely to pass their classes and the boards. What more of a red flag can there be than a 15 AA on a much less challenging standardized examination than the NDBE 1's ? Should they fail out, it would be a massive blow to the student's personal life, and they would still have to pay back the amount they requested in loans for that/those year/years. It's nothing short of being kicked in the ass twice on the way out.
Yeah, the DAT is one exam, on one afternoon. But the performance on that one day is very telling of one's ability at state and potential. The subsequent exams you'll face in dental school will also be one or more exams, on given day. The NDBE I is also one massive exam, on a certain day. The patients you will see in the future, will be one patient, in a given half hour or hour. This is about maximizing efforts and excelling at a task in a given moment, and developing the mental endurance to maintain that effort for periods of time.
Bravo, very well articulated 👍
I could understand a person scoring a 15 on one section of the DAT, but for a person to average a 15 and get accepted is absolutely absurd. Moreover, that girl who got accepted into Marquette with a 16 is equally bad. Stop making excuses for these people. We all took the same test, some with better situations and others with less. Bottom line is that you control your destiny. I could probably take the DAT 20 years from now and get at least a 16. Although I don't wish bad luck onto others, I'll bet you that the 15 and 16 girl will flunk out.

