- Joined
- Jan 15, 2018
- Messages
- 147
- Reaction score
- 287
Hi all, I’m looking for some guidance and insight:
I have an interview coming up at Mt. Sinai. This was a delusional, starry-eyed reach for me--I have a 67 LM: <10th percentile MCAT, <25th percentile GPA. I didn’t have any research before my gap year. My clinical exposure is quite low. No prestigious awards. Graduated from my state school. Not URM. I included a few T20 (T25?) schools that I really loved because, according to multiple sources, military service is highly valued. I had the savings, so I decided to try.
I THINK the strengths of my application make me best suited for low tier schools with a strong service bent. I highlighted recurring themes like public health, social justice, compassionate leadership, and cultural competence. My other interviews are from Loyola (accepted), Maryland (state school) (waitlisted), and EVMS (upcoming). These interviews felt/feel easier to anticipate, as I can more clearly understand what they’d see in me--that is, my impression of my own application seemed to align more organically with their stats, mission, matriculant profile, etc.
I’ve also received several pre-II rejections from both mid and top tier schools alike, including Georgetown, Tufts, Dartmouth, Brown, and Tulane. While most are low-yield, they also have a reputation for loving non-trads, veterans, and "do-gooders." I’d concluded my stats were too low and/or my narrative was not compelling enough.
Enter my Sinai interview...where of course I want to do well. Ideally, I’d like to go in with some strong sense of what they liked about me--not only to steady my confidence, but also to help me highlight those elements they considered strengths. But now I’m a little distrustful of my evaluation of my application. Given they have their choice of top-tier candidates, I'm unsure what they saw in my application that mid tiers did not.
I’ve reviewed my application inside and out, and I’ve read everything on their website. I do feel that my app fulfills their “desired intangibles”...but not SO much that it compensates for low stats, low clinical, and no research. Could I be missing something? Can anyone offer insight into how I can best prepare for this interview? Perhaps I’m overthinking, but I want to put my best foot forward.
I have an interview coming up at Mt. Sinai. This was a delusional, starry-eyed reach for me--I have a 67 LM: <10th percentile MCAT, <25th percentile GPA. I didn’t have any research before my gap year. My clinical exposure is quite low. No prestigious awards. Graduated from my state school. Not URM. I included a few T20 (T25?) schools that I really loved because, according to multiple sources, military service is highly valued. I had the savings, so I decided to try.
I THINK the strengths of my application make me best suited for low tier schools with a strong service bent. I highlighted recurring themes like public health, social justice, compassionate leadership, and cultural competence. My other interviews are from Loyola (accepted), Maryland (state school) (waitlisted), and EVMS (upcoming). These interviews felt/feel easier to anticipate, as I can more clearly understand what they’d see in me--that is, my impression of my own application seemed to align more organically with their stats, mission, matriculant profile, etc.
I’ve also received several pre-II rejections from both mid and top tier schools alike, including Georgetown, Tufts, Dartmouth, Brown, and Tulane. While most are low-yield, they also have a reputation for loving non-trads, veterans, and "do-gooders." I’d concluded my stats were too low and/or my narrative was not compelling enough.
Enter my Sinai interview...where of course I want to do well. Ideally, I’d like to go in with some strong sense of what they liked about me--not only to steady my confidence, but also to help me highlight those elements they considered strengths. But now I’m a little distrustful of my evaluation of my application. Given they have their choice of top-tier candidates, I'm unsure what they saw in my application that mid tiers did not.
I’ve reviewed my application inside and out, and I’ve read everything on their website. I do feel that my app fulfills their “desired intangibles”...but not SO much that it compensates for low stats, low clinical, and no research. Could I be missing something? Can anyone offer insight into how I can best prepare for this interview? Perhaps I’m overthinking, but I want to put my best foot forward.