Is it me or does most of the people on this site think that the DAT is based on luck with the type of questions you get... More with the Bio and RC than other sections. That really makes me nervous.
depends on what kind of scores you are talking about
Solid scores between 20-23 AA are not really luck, these are just hard work + smarts.
In my opinion, and please folks, this is just an opinion, anyone who gets 24 (or higher) is a combination of these 3:
1)hard working
2)natural smarts
3)massive amount of luck for getting an exam version that just happen to have most of the questions be of topics familure to the testee
Study enough/hard enough and you won't need luck~
What is the definition of "study enough"... how do you measure what is "enough"?
I don't believe there is a single person in this world that feels 100% prepared for the DAT the night before the test. There is pretty much infinant amount of information to know, you just CAN'T possibly know it ALL. So by this logic.... "enough" never gets reached.
I say there is some luck involved. The difference between 23-25+ can be one-two random questions that noone can prep for. Either you know it, or don't, or you might get lucky.
What is the definition of "study enough"... how do you measure what is "enough"?
I don't believe there is a single person in this world that feels 100% prepared for the DAT the night before the test. There is pretty much infinant amount of information to know, you just CAN'T possibly know it ALL. So by this logic.... "enough" never gets reached.
Well, I thought I was fully prepared, but I didn't get everything right, so meh. The night before my test I felt calm and ready and watched Miss Congeniality before going to bed I don't remember coming across anything I had never read about before, but I still got something wrong, so I guess there's some truth in that. Nevertheless, I feel I deserved my scores considering just how much time I put into studying. F luck.
And I would say the difference between 23-25 is the one or two questions person A knew by studying an extra hour every day vs person B that didn't. It's not like the test writers pull stuff out of obscure research papers from Malaysia Dental Journal Quarterly. They get everything out of the textbooks they tell you about. Either you studied it or you didn't. Blaming luck is kinda silly.
And my point is the more of #1 you have, the less of #3 you need. Luck is even less of a variable for someone who scores a straight 24 vs someone who lucks out once and scores a 24 on one section.
Luck is just something people can blame for being under-prepared.