- Joined
- Sep 28, 2007
- Messages
- 111
- Reaction score
- 0
As I navigate through the cosmos of options open to me as a future PhD student, I'm finding myself a little dizzied ... I find that I have some great qualities (good GRE, a 3.9 GPA in 18 credits of Psych, two glowing LORs, graduate work in linguistics), and some not-so-great qualities (no statistics or research design classes, trouble getting a third LOR, no clinical experience). I feel like I'm on the brink of being a successful candidate. So, to round myself out, I've been considering going for an MA or MS in "General Psych," but that means two years and who knows how much $?
At the same time, I've just begun looking into taking undergrad classes (specifically at Northwestern's SCS--School of Continuing Studies--program) instead--something to fill in the gaps, instead of getting a whole other degree (one that I'll attain anyway, through most PhD programs). I need to do this just for some of the Master's programs I'm looking into, but I wonder: All else being equal (i.e., my research interests remain the same, I have the same goals, my grades are still very good, etc.), would taking a handful of classes at the undergrad level--maybe even enough, added to my current 18 credits, to equal having majored in Psych--make me as attractive a candidate for PhD programs as getting a Master's degree would?
My list of pros and cons is this:
Master's pros: more recent LORs when it comes time to apply to PhD, a thesis (possibly a publication, which is nice, but I'm not looking at a purely academic career).
Master's cons: going $25-40k in the hole, having to apply for 2010 PhD admissions, probably not having time to work in a clinical setting, would still have to take some SCS classes to be considered for some programs.
SCS pros: relatively inexpensive, not as time-consuming (can apply for 2009 PhD admissions), can offer me time to work somewhere in the field.
SCS cons: probably can't get an LOR (or can I?) out of it, there might not be enough classes to keep me intellectually occupied for the next two years.
Am I missing something? Has anyone else gone the SCS route?
At the same time, I've just begun looking into taking undergrad classes (specifically at Northwestern's SCS--School of Continuing Studies--program) instead--something to fill in the gaps, instead of getting a whole other degree (one that I'll attain anyway, through most PhD programs). I need to do this just for some of the Master's programs I'm looking into, but I wonder: All else being equal (i.e., my research interests remain the same, I have the same goals, my grades are still very good, etc.), would taking a handful of classes at the undergrad level--maybe even enough, added to my current 18 credits, to equal having majored in Psych--make me as attractive a candidate for PhD programs as getting a Master's degree would?
My list of pros and cons is this:
Master's pros: more recent LORs when it comes time to apply to PhD, a thesis (possibly a publication, which is nice, but I'm not looking at a purely academic career).
Master's cons: going $25-40k in the hole, having to apply for 2010 PhD admissions, probably not having time to work in a clinical setting, would still have to take some SCS classes to be considered for some programs.
SCS pros: relatively inexpensive, not as time-consuming (can apply for 2009 PhD admissions), can offer me time to work somewhere in the field.
SCS cons: probably can't get an LOR (or can I?) out of it, there might not be enough classes to keep me intellectually occupied for the next two years.
Am I missing something? Has anyone else gone the SCS route?