- Joined
- Oct 24, 2008
- Messages
- 137
- Reaction score
- 65
- Points
- 4,726
What other states are like, or are as bad, as Florida in terms of the cost of malpractice insurance?
Conversely, what are the "best" states for doctors, specifically psychiatrists?
What other states are like, or are as bad, as Florida in terms of the cost of malpractice insurance?
Conversely, what are the "best" states for doctors, specifically psychiatrists?
Idaho actually does have a cap of 400k. You're right that the culture isn't really geared towards litgation, though it has drastically changed in the mid 2000s with a large Californian influx due to the housing bubble. Even still most of the litgation isn't medical, and there doesn't seem to be any lawyers that are overly interested in cases without GROSS negligence.There are websites that rank physician friendliness. Try google.
Idaho always ranks high even without malpractice caps. The culture in Idaho is certainly different than Florida.
Also consider calling The Doctor's Company and asking about rates in different areas. I feel like they are one of the better malpractice companies.
Idaho actually does have a cap of 400k. You're right that the culture isn't really geared towards litgation, though it has drastically changed in the mid 2000s with a large Californian influx due to the housing bubble. Even still most of the litgation isn't medical, and there doesn't seem to be any lawyers that are overly interested in cases without GROSS negligence.
On the flip side Florida is the synthetic opiate capital of the world. It has a large population that ends up with debilitating injuries even do to minor misteps in treatment (the elderly). Some of the sketchiest practitioners work there, along with some of the sketchiest attorneys. It was not odd to watch a television commercial break and not see 2 to 3 attorney commercials in Florida most usually pointed towards medicine.
Sent from my SM-G900V using SDN mobile
Florida is also one of the few states where you are not required to carry malpractice insurance. In fact, MANY physicians do not carry it which significantly decreases the incentive for junk litigation.
Except God forbid when you are actually medically negligent, then are royally SCREWED.
Hmm not really. I mean if you deserve to have your license suspended by the board, then yes, but financially speaking and from a litigation perspective, as long as your assets are protected, most trial lawyers will not even accept the case if the physician doesn't have insurance because they know they are not going to be able to collect.
I'm skeptical of that article given that it's nameless and written by a medical malpractice insurance firm that touts itself as "largest in the nation", but I would be curious to know if there is actually any precendence for garnishing an MD's future wages in a malpractice case where he/she did not carry insurance.https://www.equotemd.com/blog/doctors-going-bare-in-florida-without-medical-malpractice-insurance/
Physicians today are under the false assumption that if they do not carry medical malpractice insurance, and there is no insurance money to go after, that they cannot be sued, or that they cannot lose money. This is a dangerous misconception.
Courts do have the ability to garnish future wages. For example, if a physician makes a mistake and causes the patient damage, that damage could have an effect of the patient’s future earning potential. If the courts find that the damage will cost the patient $200,000 over the next ten years, the courts have the power to garnish that physicians future earnings to pay the patient over time for those damages done to the patient.
Will a plaintiffs attorney want to get paid by garnished wages for the next 20 years? What if the doctor files bankruptcy. I think Florida protects your house against civil judgment or bankruptcy so you can by a big house and protect assets that way.
MMS: Error
Nice overview on malpractice among specialties.
Psych is the lowest at 2.9%, and the median is around 190k per case.
Surprisingly OBGYN isn't the highest, as I thought it would be...
Even though it says error, link should work
I thought it was interesting that from this data the median judgment in pediatrics is in the top third ranked by specialty, but the mean judgment for pediatrics soars waaaaay past any of the other specialties. I assume this is because juries are wont to impose enormous damages on perpetrators of dead children, especially children who die absent the setting of surgery or obvious trauma, where everyone goes into it with at least some sense of risk.