• Practice your interview with the new SDN AI Interview Coach. Choose a school, answer by voice or typing, and receive a personalized feedback report. Available now to all SDN members. Try the AI Interview Coach.

Malpractice Insurance

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

terriermed

Full Member
10+ Year Member
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Hi all,
Negotiating my first job out of fellowship at an academic center. I asked about malpractice insurance, particularly about tail coverage, and their response is below. This is entirely covered by the hospital, I don't pay anything. For those of you with experience, does this seem reasonable or is there anything concerning? Thanks.

[Hospital X's] Professional Liability Self-Insurance Program began on July 1, 1988. [Hospital X] Risk Management coordinates the Professional Liability Self-Insurance Program and assures liability coverage with the [State X] Injured patients and Families Compensation Fund, in excess of the primary annual limits of $1,000,000 per incident and $3,000,000 in the aggregate. The insurance is occurrence in form; accordingly, tail coverage is not necessary upon termination from [Hospital X] employment. Even after employment termination, providers are covered for activities that were performed during their employment and that were within the scope of their duties for the [Hospital X].
 
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Good question.

They have a occurrence based malpractice policy in a state with malpractice reform. That's great. The coverage should be fine and if you ever switch jobs you won't pay a tail.
Many of the smaller groups require a tail on exit (claims made policy).
 
Most hospitals have the 1:3 verbiage in their bylaws.

If you leave and your new insurer may offer a tail, if they do that I would get one just in case. Be careful with the attorney words, don't obviously do anything outside of your scope of practice.