• Set Yourself Up For Success Webinar

    October 6, 2021 at 2 PM Eastern/11 AM Pacific
    SDN and Osmosis are teaming up to help you get set up for success this school year! We'll be covering study tips, healthy habits, and meeting mentors.

    Register Now!

  • Funniest Story on the Job Contest Starts Now!

    Contest starts now and ends September 27th. Winner will receive a special user banner and $10 Amazon Gift card!

  • Site Updates Coming Next Week

    Site updates are coming next week on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. Click the button below to learn more!


Malpractice trivia #2


Senior Member
15+ Year Member
May 24, 2003
This is only for real clinicians...{they tell me I start strange post}

PSA test may as well be equated with trickery..

1)American Cancer society recommends PSA for men over 50..
2)American Urological Society recommends PSA for men over 50
3)CDC saysthe test does not reduce risk of death or increase quality of life, nor does potential benefit outweigh the harm of screening and treatment.
4) the U.S. Preventive Task force advises against PSA in men 75 and older but agrees thee is no consensus for youNger men..

*The thing here is that in lets say a 62 year old patient is his prostate CA adenocarcinioma or is it the more agressive sarcoma??
In one year an aggressive prostate sarcoma may only give this patient 2 years to live and prostatecomy is out of the question!! Leaving only radiation or hormonal therapy.. Notice that even if this patient chose hormonal therapy in one year the cancer could become hormone refractory..Giving a very poor prognosis since the cancer is not localized and too advanced..

Moral of story:
Althought discounted on this forum...The practioner must communicate properly to the patient .. OFFER HIM A PSA AND DRE AT LEAST A FEW TIMES! Communicate in layman terms the pros and cons of the PSA and DRE..

Although the PSA doesnt increase the likelihood of survival or decrease morbidity and mortality.. Even if its controversial you must TALK to Patient about the PSA! The jury in this case would favor the patient since the doc didnt offer him the early choice of a PSA ..

Because malpractice is often based on misdiagnosis , failure to diagnose or in this case DELAY in DIAGNOSIS!

**Offer the patient the PSA/DRE and say it with conviction dont say it like a girl!!:xf:
Last edited:
About the Ads
This thread is more than 12 years old.

Your message may be considered spam for the following reasons:

  1. Your new thread title is very short, and likely is unhelpful.
  2. Your reply is very short and likely does not add anything to the thread.
  3. Your reply is very long and likely does not add anything to the thread.
  4. It is very likely that it does not need any further discussion and thus bumping it serves no purpose.
  5. Your message is mostly quotes or spoilers.
  6. Your reply has occurred very quickly after a previous reply and likely does not add anything to the thread.
  7. This thread is locked.