Marijuana for intractable chronic pain

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

kstarm

Full Member
10+ Year Member
Joined
Oct 28, 2009
Messages
631
Reaction score
419
Despite limited evidence and the advisory panel of MDs who were asked to assess this being strongly against adding this indication.....





MDH to add intractable pain as qualifying condition for state medical cannabis program
Minnesota Commissioner of Health Dr. Ed Ehlinger today announced his decision to add intractable pain as a qualifying condition for Minnesota’s medical cannabis program. He also called upon the state’s health care community to boost efforts to help patients deal with pain more effectively.
In making the announcement, Commissioner Ehlinger acknowledged a range of views on the issue as well as the difficulty of making a public health decision without the benefit of an abundance of solid, scientific evidence about benefits and risks.
“The relative scarcity of firm evidence made this a difficult decision,” Commissioner Ehlinger said. “However, given the strong medical focus of Minnesota’s medical cannabis program and the compelling testimony of hundreds of Minnesotans, it became clear that the right and compassionate choice was to add intractable pain to the program’s list of qualifying conditions. This gives new options for clinicians and new hope for suffering patients.”
When the 2014 Minnesota Legislature passed the law creating Minnesota’s medical cannabis program, it included a set of nine health conditions that would qualify a person to receive medical cannabis. The law tasked the health commissioner with evaluating what conditions to add, and required that the first of the conditions to be considered was intractable pain.
The 2014 law defines intractable pain as a condition “in which the cause of the pain cannot be removed or otherwise treated with the consent of the patient and in which, in the generally accepted course of medical practice, no relief or cure of the cause of the pain is possible, or none has been found after reasonable efforts.”
Under current law, patients certified as having intractable pain will be eligible to receive medical cannabis from the state’s two medical cannabis manufacturers on August 1, 2016. As with the program’s other qualifying conditions, patients seeking medical cannabis to treat intractable pain will need advance certification from a Minnesota health care provider. More information on the program’s certification process is available on the MDH website at Medical Cannabis: Intractable Pain.
The Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) Office of Medical Cannabis worked over the last few months to collect available scientific information, and developed a community engagement process that included 13 public meetings around the state as well as an online comment submission process. In the end, MDH heard from nearly 500 Minnesotans – more than 90 percent supporting the addition of intractable pain as a qualifying condition.
MDH also established an advisory panel comprised of clinicians and medical providers to look at the available evidence and deliver recommendations. A majority of the panel recommended not approving intractable pain for the program. According to Commissioner Ehlinger, the panel recommendations reflected the complex and divided views on the topic, as well as an interest in seeing more clinical evidence regarding benefits and risks.
“As a physician, I share the concerns of health care providers and I sympathize with their desire for more information,” Commissioner Ehlinger said. “In the end I determined that with Minnesota’s cautious and well-designed program, we can safely and responsibly give patients and providers the option of adding medical cannabis as a tool to treat intractable pain.”
Commissioner Ehlinger pointed to a number of provisions within Minnesota’s medical cannabis program that reduce the risk of misuse. First, the program has a strong medical focus, with features designed to generate real-world information about the product’s efficacy. Second, the program limits the form of cannabis to pill, liquid or vapor. This has the benefit of reducing the risk of drug diversion for improper use or for recreational use. Third, the program allows for just two manufacturers to grow and produce medication, with strong process controls and security measures.
Commissioner Ehlinger urged health care providers to exercise special scrutiny and care before recommending medical cannabis to members of certain groups for which there is more robust evidence to suggest potential risks associated with medical cannabis use. These groups include:

  • Infants and children;
  • Pregnant women;
  • Nursing mothers; and
  • Individuals with a personal or family history of psychosis.
Recognizing a need for helping health care providers learn more about the potential benefits and risks of medical cannabis for treating intractable pain, Commissioner Ehlinger directed the MDH Office of Medical Cannabis to provide additional education and guidance to the patients and the medical community about the appropriate use of medical cannabis.
MDH also will be asking providers to share information every six months regarding the positive and negative impacts of medical cannabis experienced by patients with intractable pain. This information will be summarized and shared with the public.
Finally, Commissioner Ehlinger indicated that the process of considering intractable pain as a qualifying condition showed that pain management remains a significant challenge for many patients across the state. In response, MDH will help coordinate a broader conversation with the state’s medical community about how to effectively address pain management.
-MDH-

Members don't see this ad.
 
Members don't see this ad :)
Bad idea. Anyone can say they have chronic pain and this doesn't change the DEA rules.

Just one more hassle when I tell people they can keep opioids or their weed, but not both..
 
A different article on this issue for MN listed high state program costs and low enrollment. Only 780 people enrolled and they expected thousands. I am glad that " we got bills to pay" is a legitimate reason to expand the diagnosis list to include intractable pain.
 
Dr. Ed Ehlinger sounds like an idiot....great. Hopefully this doesn't set a precedent which other states will follow
 
Dr. Ed Ehlinger sounds like an idiot....great. Hopefully this doesn't set a precedent which other states will follow
How many states with medical MJ don't allow it for Chronic Pain?
 
Risks....
Makes Harold and Kumar much funnier
 
Risks: Read a recent science blurb that high potency MJ causes visible white matter damage on fMRI. What ever happened to it being a great "medicine"? This legalization bull**** is addiction and vice masquerading as medicine.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
I was actually on the committee that looked at adding "intractable pain" as a condition that would be allowed in Minnesota. The opinions I have are mine alone.

Initially I had thought it might be a good idea to add "Intractable Pain" but after reviewing the results of 320 studies, and the lack of compelling evidence that any other medication would need to pass to be allowed by the FDA, I voted against it. I do believe it is a safer medication than the opioid class of medications but until we know specific conditions it helps and % of THC and cannabinoids that are found to be helpful through double blind studies with low likelihood of bias, and not financed by the drug companies it should be not allowed.

We did make the recommendation that cannabis be changed from Class I status to Class II so it can be studied. With the over 100 cannabinoids and the majority of them not studied, this makes sense. In my opinion the program was set wrong to begin with. We had found that providers were very reluctant to prescribe medical cannabis due to lack of education and evidence that it is indeed helpful for pain and that they were still very sensitized due to the opioid epidemic. When we made the decision at a public meeting to not recommend it for "intractable pain" several guys in suits and ties got up and exited the meeting. If I were a betting man I would say they were members of "Big Cannabis" and not very happy with our decision.

Despite our recommendation and a lot of hard work the commissioner choose to allow it. Intractable pain is a legal tem and not a medical condition and if allowed makes a huge amount of patients eligible for cannabis, so I am sure "big cannabis" was pushing the designation. Probably the best news is that in Minnesota there is no data base searchable by the public that they can go to when their provider says they are not comfortable prescribing it. So unless this part is changed I do not see many more patients being added despite the addition of "Intractable Pain"
 
I was actually on the committee that looked at adding "intractable pain" as a condition that would be allowed in Minnesota. The opinions I have are mine alone.

Initially I had thought it might be a good idea to add "Intractable Pain" but after reviewing the results of 320 studies, and the lack of compelling evidence that any other medication would need to pass to be allowed by the FDA, I voted against it. I do believe it is a safer medication than the opioid class of medications but until we know specific conditions it helps and % of THC and cannabinoids that are found to be helpful through double blind studies with low likelihood of bias, and not financed by the drug companies it should be not allowed.

We did make the recommendation that cannabis be changed from Class I status to Class II so it can be studied. With the over 100 cannabinoids and the majority of them not studied, this makes sense. In my opinion the program was set wrong to begin with. We had found that providers were very reluctant to prescribe medical cannabis due to lack of education and evidence that it is indeed helpful for pain and that they were still very sensitized due to the opioid epidemic. When we made the decision at a public meeting to not recommend it for "intractable pain" several guys in suits and ties got up and exited the meeting. If I were a betting man I would say they were members of "Big Cannabis" and not very happy with our decision.

Despite our recommendation and a lot of hard work the commissioner choose to allow it. Intractable pain is a legal tem and not a medical condition and if allowed makes a huge amount of patients eligible for cannabis, so I am sure "big cannabis" was pushing the designation. Probably the best news is that in Minnesota there is no data base searchable by the public that they can go to when their provider says they are not comfortable prescribing it. So unless this part is changed I do not see many more patients being added despite the addition of "Intractable Pain"

Our state is embarking on the same work MN completed but trying to strike a balance between "medicinal" and "recreational" cannabis.

http://www.bizjournals.com/portland...ate-brown-led-task-force-will-scrutinize.html

Where is the link to the full MN report?
 
Top