- Joined
- Apr 9, 2008
- Messages
- 211
- Reaction score
- 1
It seems that I keep getting these types of questions wrong, so something's not right in my thinking process.
For TBR, page 46, Passage 1, question 2 the mass does not affect the range. I get that. Because "m" isn't in the kinematic equations, nor in the "R" (range equation). Question 17 reaffirms this.
However, out of no where, Passage 5, Q #30 says that mass does affect the range, because a change of mass---> changes KE (1/2mv^2)---> and changes the velocity, which in turn changes the range...
So why wasn't this same explanation was given for Passage 1, question 2?? Isn't there a KE change if you throw the stone from the top of the rocket? Then range (x=Vox * t) would also change because a change in mass, changes KE, velocity, range.. etc.
edit
nvm. i think i get it.. it has to do with keeping velocity fixed or not.
For TBR, page 46, Passage 1, question 2 the mass does not affect the range. I get that. Because "m" isn't in the kinematic equations, nor in the "R" (range equation). Question 17 reaffirms this.
However, out of no where, Passage 5, Q #30 says that mass does affect the range, because a change of mass---> changes KE (1/2mv^2)---> and changes the velocity, which in turn changes the range...
So why wasn't this same explanation was given for Passage 1, question 2?? Isn't there a KE change if you throw the stone from the top of the rocket? Then range (x=Vox * t) would also change because a change in mass, changes KE, velocity, range.. etc.
edit
nvm. i think i get it.. it has to do with keeping velocity fixed or not.
Last edited: