Masters Program w/ no 3.0 GPA Req.?

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

BunnyMonkey

Full Member
10+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Joined
Aug 29, 2006
Messages
63
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I'm new to this forum, but I'm wondering if any of you know of Master Programs that does not have a requirement of gpa >3.0? Is there a list?

It would be a waste of time to apply for a program that has a min. gpa of 3.0 requirement if my gpa is less than 3.0. Just wondering if there are many programs that don't have that requirement....

thanks.
 
Hi,

I'm new to this forum, but I'm wondering if any of you know of Master Programs that does not have a requirement of gpa >3.0? Is there a list?

It would be a waste of time to apply for a program that has a min. gpa of 3.0 requirement if my gpa is less than 3.0. Just wondering if there are many programs that don't have that requirement....

thanks.

I wouldn't be surprised if there were schools that were OK with a 2.8, but I have not run into any or heard of anything. All the schools under University of California require a 3.0.

On a side note, they do let people with <3.0 GPAs in under special acception. I got into a UC grad program with a 2.65, but it required a lot of proof that i wasn't going to bomb the first quarter of grad school. Pretty much showed them 1.5 years worth of post-bacc and a 36 on the MCAT (subbed for GRE).
As far as I know, I know, out of the 16 first year students, I was the only one that was admitted with a <3.0 GPA. Doesn't hurt to ask if some schools make acceptions though. Good luck!
 
Hi,

I'm new to this forum, but I'm wondering if any of you know of Master Programs that does not have a requirement of gpa >3.0? Is there a list?

It would be a waste of time to apply for a program that has a min. gpa of 3.0 requirement if my gpa is less than 3.0. Just wondering if there are many programs that don't have that requirement....

thanks.

One would think that if you hope to apply to medical school in the future you would need to do a post-bacc (as relentless did) before going the master's route. As you may know the grades you receive in a Master's program (either SMP or MS) do not count towards your GPA enhancement, which you need.
 
One would think that if you hope to apply to medical school in the future you would need to do a post-bacc (as relentless did) before going the master's route. As you may know the grades you receive in a Master's program (either SMP or MS) do not count towards your GPA enhancement, which you need.
+1

Med schools weight the undergrad GPA much more - a 2.8 UG with a 4.0 graduate is much less competitive than a 3.2 UG with a 3.6 graduate. Do a post-bacc before considering a master's program.
 
If you are talking about SMPs, then I think EVMS and Drexel's program have a minimum GPA of 2.75 or something. But I don't know how successful applicants with such a GPA have been.
 
If you are talking about SMPs, then I think EVMS and Drexel's program have a minimum GPA of 2.75 or something. But I don't know how successful applicants with such a GPA have been.
Most SMP's don't take people w/ under a 3.0 simply because it'll hurt their acceptance #'s. A sub-3.0 GPA with and MCAT under 40 is a long shot at matriculation - and even if you do get that high on the MCAT, everyone's going to ask, "what the hell happened in school?"

Post-baccs are for this very purpose - to say, "I was an idiot, but I'm no longer an idiot, see? (transcript)"

SMP's are to say, "I was an idiot, but I showed I'm no longer an idiot - you guys just need some more convincing. How about I mix in with your fancy med students and show them a thing or two about biochem? Then you'll have to believe I'm the cat's pajamas."

In my head, usually this follows by, "oh god, please let me in, please, please, please . . . " and the ADCOM pushing me off their porch.
 
Thanks all for your replies. I was under the impression that a postbac would be competitive to get in also. If I want to impress the med schools, then wouldn't be better to show them that I can handle some courses that med school students are taking as well?
 
Thanks all for your replies. I was under the impression that a postbac would be competitive to get in also. If I want to impress the med schools, then wouldn't be better to show them that I can handle some courses that med school students are taking as well?

Post-bacc programs (non-linkage) tend to be less competative than SMPs. Mainly because post-bacc programs usually have plenty of space since you take classes with other undergrads. SMPs on the other hand have less space, and they want someone who is more likely to survive the rigorous med school curriculum offered by the programs.

True, med school classes may imply that you will do well in med school. This is why SMPs are great. BUT, that may also depend on which school you are applying too. It is always up to the school to determine if "med school" classes are sufficiently rigorous enough. UCLA and University of Washington told me that they will look at med school courses on a case by case basis. These classes were taken at UC Davis School of Medicine, so not too shabby.
Ultimately, as Sundarban1 said, med school classes are still considered as GRADUATE level, therefore these DO NOT affect your undergraduate GPA. Therefore if that is what you are trying to do (e.g., improve your UG GPA), then I would suggest doing post-bacc. For me, i've taken numerous classes through our medical school due to my PhD requirements. But our director of admissions has always pushed me towards taking more upper division undergrad classes to boost my GPA. Therefore at least in terms of the University of California, undergrad GPA vs. grad GPA (regardless of med school classes or not) is more important.

Your original question suggests that you do have a <3.0 GPA, therefore it behooves you to know that some schools also screen GPA. The cut-off is around a 3.0-3.2, therefore you may not even get a secondary application if you are screened out.

Lastly, SMPs, post-baccs and whatever else tend to want students that have "high probability" of getting into med school. They do this to enhance their reputation. For example, a person with a 3.0 GPA who maintains a 4.0 GPA in the program will be in a better position than a person who starts out with a 2.8 GPA despite maintaining a 4.0 in the same program. Additionally all of these programs will have a variety of students that are applying.
 
KCOM has a 2 year M.S. which is thesis based, and they take people with 2.5 GPA. I am in the program right now, and it is great. I take Biochem and physiology with the med students, and will start the DO program in 2008. Lots of fun!
 
Top