- Joined
- Nov 14, 2004
- Messages
- 83
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
-
Scholarship Access: Becoming a Student Doctor course
Free access to comprehensive medical school prep. Eligible students include AAMC FAP recipients and HS graduates from underserved areas. Apply today.
Match
- Thread starter uclaguy
- Start date
Columbia:
12 OMFS
WOW! thats just crazy.. columbia def looks A LOT better now! 😍
12 OMFS
WOW! thats just crazy.. columbia def looks A LOT better now! 😍
- Joined
- Jun 10, 2005
- Messages
- 1,367
- Reaction score
- 12
- Points
- 4,551
- Location
- Los Angeles, CA
- Resident [Any Field]
what about: # matched/# applied?
that's the meaningful number
that's the meaningful number
- Joined
- Jan 25, 2005
- Messages
- 84
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
with around 75 seniors graduating and 12 going into OMFS..you do the math!
I heard 14 applied.
I heard 14 applied.
V
v&andy_yankee
from the CU email:
"Congratulations to the CLASS OF 2006 on a superb Match!!! As we know, of the 4500 national senior dental students about 1 in 3-4 attains any GPR/AEGD/specialty training program annually. Only about 1 in 5 attains a specialty training position. In our relatively small senior class we have (this will change a bit over the next 2 weeks):
Class of 06
SUMMARY as of 1/30/06
OMFS 11
ORTHO 8
PED. DENT 4
PERIO 1
PROSTH. 4
ENDO 3
GPR 22
AEGD 17
UNIFORMED SVCS. 5*
PRIVATE PRACTICE 4
NHSC 1
Withdrew/NON-MATCH 8
* Some in specialty
We typically have about a dozen initial non-matches, a bit
lower this year;. All or most of the WD/Non
Match will yet be placed; we have had calls from a large number of GPR/AEGD programs seeking to fill spots! Again congratulations to all for their hard work and the foresight to seek a GPR/AEGD/specialty program. Extraordinary results and a credit to us all!"
"Congratulations to the CLASS OF 2006 on a superb Match!!! As we know, of the 4500 national senior dental students about 1 in 3-4 attains any GPR/AEGD/specialty training program annually. Only about 1 in 5 attains a specialty training position. In our relatively small senior class we have (this will change a bit over the next 2 weeks):
Class of 06
SUMMARY as of 1/30/06
OMFS 11
ORTHO 8
PED. DENT 4
PERIO 1
PROSTH. 4
ENDO 3
GPR 22
AEGD 17
UNIFORMED SVCS. 5*
PRIVATE PRACTICE 4
NHSC 1
Withdrew/NON-MATCH 8
* Some in specialty
We typically have about a dozen initial non-matches, a bit
lower this year;. All or most of the WD/Non
Match will yet be placed; we have had calls from a large number of GPR/AEGD programs seeking to fill spots! Again congratulations to all for their hard work and the foresight to seek a GPR/AEGD/specialty program. Extraordinary results and a credit to us all!"
- Joined
- Jun 10, 2005
- Messages
- 1,367
- Reaction score
- 12
- Points
- 4,551
- Location
- Los Angeles, CA
- Resident [Any Field]
WonderY said:
UCLA had 17/21 match ortho, which is unheard of.
Only 1 applied to OMS this year but he matched.
A bunch matched pedo and perio.
Endo did well too. Shoot, they all did great. 2006 is an outstanding class.
- Joined
- Nov 7, 2005
- Messages
- 301
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
- Dental Student
drhobie7 said:
Since ucla is pass/no pass, does matching have to do soley with board 1 performance...?
I am just trying to figure out why 17 matched in ortho and 4 didn't... where do they draw the line...?
thanks.
- Joined
- Jun 10, 2005
- Messages
- 1,367
- Reaction score
- 12
- Points
- 4,551
- Location
- Los Angeles, CA
- Resident [Any Field]
mcshow2 said:
Those are unbelievable match results. I guarantee you won't find numbers like that anywhere else. Not everyone can get into ortho.
- Joined
- May 4, 2004
- Messages
- 391
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
- Location
- Will 2nd year ever end?
- Dental Student
From my friends on the interview trail, I heard that the number who applied to ortho from UCLA was in the 30's because of all the previous year grads who applied this year.drhobie7 said:
raZ10 said:
I never thought Columbia looked bad in the first place 😛
drhobie7 said:
Is it cause of UCLA that UCSF has pretty bad match numbers this last year?
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2001
- Messages
- 1,003
- Reaction score
- 1
- Points
- 4,551
Class of 06
SUMMARY as of 1/30/06
OMFS 11 (I think 14 applied)
ORTHO 8 (i think 9-12 or so applied)
PED. DENT 4 (9 applied, not as many people matched cause all but one person applied to mostly/only NYC area programs)
PERIO 1 (1 or 2 applied)
PROSTH. 4 (4 applied...all got into #1 choices, as far as I know)
ENDO 3 (3 applied...all got into #1 choices, as far as I know)
GPR 22
AEGD 17
UNIFORMED SVCS. 5*
PRIVATE PRACTICE 4
NHSC 1
Withdrew/NON-MATCH 8
SUMMARY as of 1/30/06
OMFS 11 (I think 14 applied)
ORTHO 8 (i think 9-12 or so applied)
PED. DENT 4 (9 applied, not as many people matched cause all but one person applied to mostly/only NYC area programs)
PERIO 1 (1 or 2 applied)
PROSTH. 4 (4 applied...all got into #1 choices, as far as I know)
ENDO 3 (3 applied...all got into #1 choices, as far as I know)
GPR 22
AEGD 17
UNIFORMED SVCS. 5*
PRIVATE PRACTICE 4
NHSC 1
Withdrew/NON-MATCH 8
EyeAmCommi said:
I don't think it affected UCSF. Actually, I think we had pretty good match numbers this year (from another post):
OMFS: 5/5 (the 6th person was from the class of 2005)
Perio: 1/1
Endo: 1/1
Ortho: 5/6
Pedo: 13/16 (not 100% sure on this figure...)
GPR/AEGD: Too many to count. But I believe everyone who applied matched somewhere, MOST at their #1 choice
All in all, I think we did pretty well 🙂
Yea they aren't bad. I was just surprised there weren't more applicants.
