Math destroyer

[joonkimdds]

---

Members do not see this ad.

it says 32 x 10^3 is same as 0.000032.
Could someone tell me how?

 

[GiTsticker]

If it says that, then it is wrong!

 

[Talib]

ye dude i was tryin to figure this question last night actually when i was doing test 10 of MATH Destroyer. It is wrong, a typo probably.

 

[joonkimdds]

ye dude i was tryin to figure this question last night actually when i was doing test 10 of MATH Destroyer. It is wrong, a typo probably.

There are so many errors in this book it's not even funny.

test 10, #22 says 300 x 0.65 is 185 instead of 195

also test 10, #1, it says answer is A instead of E

and test 9 #38, it has exact same solution as #40

test 9 #39, answer is D not C!

test 5 #13, it says answer is B instead of A

test 5 #5, solution says giawehgweioghaweiogh and i say that has nothing to do with math.

test 3 #38, it says answer is C instead of D

test 3 #17, it says answer is D instead of C

test 1 #32 solution says square root of 3 instead of square root of 33

test 9 #7 it says simplify square root of 10a^b/(12a^2b^3) square root of 10a^b/(12a^2b^3) when the solution is only looking for square root of 10a^b/(12a^2b^3)

test 10 #10 it says shaded region but it's not shaded at all.

test 8 #23, it says y=3x but y intercept is not 0

test 6 #26, it has 3 in front of root when it shouldn't

test 9 #31, i bet he meant (log a m^15) not just m^15

test 7 #23, it says 25% instead of 20%

test 10 #35, it says 100-86.4 is 14.6 instead of 13.6. oh my god...cmon...

Test 10 #38, center of circle is not located at the center....I think even my cousin in elementary school knows where the center of circle is located.

test 3 #6, area cannot be degree.

test 4 #11. answer is A not B!

 

[Emmie]

I'm using 08 version destroyer. Can someone please tell me what are those test # means? thx!

 

[joonkimdds]

I'm using 08 version destroyer. Can someone please tell me what are those test # means? thx!

math destroyer is a different book from dat destroyer. I think this book is ok regardless of number of errors. Some people said it's helpful although I think each question is not as lengthy as how real dat math ask. I haven't taken the real dat yet but people said each question is very lengthy and I find math destroyer to be very short.

 

[GiTsticker]

I like the math destroyer despite the errors. Actually I felt that the math in math destroyer was harder and longer than on the real thing, but not by much. The main plus is the accuracy of the questions. There were some on the test that were very similar. Plus it is endless practice which is invaluable.

 

[bennijai]

The regular DAT Destroyer combined with Kaplan is more than enough practice. Why bother with Math Destroyer?

 

[GiTsticker]

More than enough just wasn't enough /shrug.