Maxima & Minima with Diffraction?

[nfg05]

---

Members don't see this ad.

The Kaplan Physical Science Review Notes (p. 348 and 349 for anyone who currently has them) confused me. First they talk about diffraction when light passes through a small slit and say:

The location of the dark fringes (minima) is given by the following formula:
(a)sin(theta) = n(lambda)

Then, on the next page when talking about interference and Young's double slit experiment they list the maxima as (d)sin(theta) = m(lambda) and minima as (d)sin(theta) = (m+1/2)(lambda).

In these two formulas, d and a are the same thing (the width of the slit). So which is it? It seems the two discussions are contradicting each other, so did Kaplan mess up or am I missing something here?

 

[cwfergus]

I woul dhave to look over my physics II stuff but if i remember correctly,

a --> The width of the SINGLE slit
d --> The distance between the two slits (or multiple if it is a diffraction grating)

They are different for single and double slit

 

[161927]

I woul dhave to look over my physics II stuff but if i remember correctly,

a --> The width of the SINGLE slit
d --> The distance between the two slits (or multiple if it is a diffraction grating)

They are different for single and double slit

yes

 

[nfg05]

I woul dhave to look over my physics II stuff but if i remember correctly,

a --> The width of the SINGLE slit
d --> The distance between the two slits (or multiple if it is a diffraction grating)

They are different for single and double slit

Thanks a bunch for clearing that up, I'll blame it on the poorly labeled diagrams in Kaplan which make the two situations look exactly the same. Although they do say it is a double slit experiment in the 2nd case, their diagram and marking of d looks the same as the previous one with its marking of a. They don't even show multiple slits on the diagram

 

[cwfergus]

Thanks a bunch for clearing that up, I'll blame it on the poorly labeled diagrams in Kaplan which make the two situations look exactly the same. Although they do say it is a double slit experiment in the 2nd case, their diagram and marking of d looks the same as the previous one with its marking of a. They don't even show multiple slits on the diagram

I have kaplan as well, and i just checked it out, its very poorly presented and explained haha. I think im going to go over my class notes (which were really good) when i study taht section