premed1231051831
New Member
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2021
- Messages
- 5
- Reaction score
- 0
I am extremely grateful to have these options, but I have been struggling to really get a feel for these places over Zoom and make a decision, so would love any and all thoughts. My goal is to go into either IM or surgery--> oncology and then hopefully academic medicine. I am very focused on research and also want to be involved in biotech/drug design.
Mayo (MN):
Pros-
UCLA:
Pros-
Northwestern:
Pros-
Summary:
I know all of these are great options, but everything has felt/sounded the same on Zoom, and I don't have a strong gut feeling. Mayo would save me roughly $160,000 in total, which is a lot of money, and I know that the Mayo name/reputation/clinical training means a lot. However, the small class size and the fact I would essentially have to write off doing a MBA bothers me. At the same time, I don't know if those are valid reasons to choose UCLA or Northwestern, especially if going to UCLA/Northwestern would put me in a worse place for residency than Mayo (is this true?). I also know a lot of these pros/cons are general. So if anyone has thoughts or advice, I would really appreciate it. Thank you!
Mayo (MN):
Pros-
- Probably best clinical training of the three
- Small class size means a lot of mentorship and opportunities
- Insane match list
- Gave me $$$ to cover ~50% COA
- I'm very concerned the small class size is too small and I won't have friends/find my people in my med school class (especially since I'm not coming in with a partner, family, etc., and I got the vibe that a lot of people are)
- I was really hoping to do a MD/MBA, but I would only be able to do it at ASU, and I don't want to spend the $ for that degree (I could always take time off, but I don't want to take off a full 2 years to do the degree either)
- Seems like an isolated environment, concerned there is no real biotech community and people are focused on clinical medicine more than anything else
UCLA:
Pros-
- Also really great clinical training
- New curriculum means I would be able to spend a full year on research/a dual degree and still graduate in 4 years
- Great MD/MBA program
- Would be able to get in-state residency after year 1 and save some $ on tuition
- Significantly larger class size than Mayo could mean less personalized attention/mentorship
- 1 year pre-clinical curriculum feels very fast
- New curriculum means my class would be the guinea pigs and we would rotate at the same time as 1-2 classes above us
- I don't want to stay in CA forever (entire family is on the east coast) and match list is very CA-heavy
- Did not give me anywhere near close to Mayo $
Northwestern:
Pros-
- Still really great clinical training (?)
- Amazing MD/MBA program
- More traditional curriculum
- Not sure the name is at the same level as Mayo or UCLA, but not sure this is true
- Potentially slightly worse match list than UCLA/Mayo, but also not sure if this is true
- No $ yet (haven't heard back)
Summary:
I know all of these are great options, but everything has felt/sounded the same on Zoom, and I don't have a strong gut feeling. Mayo would save me roughly $160,000 in total, which is a lot of money, and I know that the Mayo name/reputation/clinical training means a lot. However, the small class size and the fact I would essentially have to write off doing a MBA bothers me. At the same time, I don't know if those are valid reasons to choose UCLA or Northwestern, especially if going to UCLA/Northwestern would put me in a worse place for residency than Mayo (is this true?). I also know a lot of these pros/cons are general. So if anyone has thoughts or advice, I would really appreciate it. Thank you!