MCAT strategy that may work for you

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

bhandal

Full Member
10+ Year Member
Joined
Jun 7, 2012
Messages
515
Reaction score
17
When I stumbled upon SDN it was like a treasure chest of information that truly helps not only on the MCAT, but also eases some nerves by networking with other students. As far as the MCAT goes on my first diagnostic I got a 17 then every two weeks I took an mcat to see the progress. Now the curious thing about the MCAT is that you can be well versed in the sciences; however, still do poorly on the test. This should come to no surprise to anyone, by the time most of us take the test we are in our third or fourth year of college and we sort of forget the simple concepts. So I've taken my last two MCATs and got 34 on AAMC 9 and a 36 on AAMC 10. Here is a little formula I used to keep edging my score up.

You can not expect to jump 10 points from studying a few MCAT topics, this is unrealistc. In the same light it is unrealistic to to attempt all 52 questions in Physical and Biological sciences and 40 questions in verbal. Let me rephrase it is unrealistic during your practice time!!!! You want to always put an answer down, but you want to build your stamina and your confidence at the same time. So here we go.
1.) Take a diagnostic test, see where you are. Do not get discouraged if you get a bad score, even if your test in a month. Remember the MCAT is a thinking test so your score will not only reflect your knowledge set, but your attitude as well. One other thing be sure, I don't know if I need to say this, try as much as possible to simulate a testing environment. got to a library and where earplugs/headphones. You will be surprised how uncomfortable you will be if it is oyur first time trying to take a test with this tools in/over your ears. It's odd and the last thing you want to worry about on test day is the emptiness in your head or the pain from an earplug inserted too far haha.
2.) Review your test, NOT ONLY THE WRONG ONES! Review the right ones because these our your strength areas and you want to be able to confirm to yourself that you know how to do them, because come test day you will answer them in literally <10 seconds, saving time for any surprise questions. I did this in two different ways, I started on a piece of paper just writing the topic then I would write why I got it wrong or right and any sort of formulas that may need to be used, then moved on. Or, you could do it in excel spread sheet and have a tab for physical sciences, verbal, and biological sciences. Within those columns for question number, right or wrong, reason, formula. I would say in your first couple of test it is ok to skip the writing section because it is a make or break sort of section and it is very easy to pick up on the strategy in which they want you to write this in. Definitely once test day is a week or two a way start taking verbal to just get over the fatigue. If it took you 5 hours to take the test it should take you 4-5 hours to review the whole thing, especially in the PHYS AND BIO sections.
3.) Before you take you next exam use this FORMULA: (number correct in section * 20%) + number correct. This number tells you basically how many to attempt in the next test. instead of going for the whole 52 only do the number outputted and guess on the rest. I know this seems counter intuitive, but you are incrementally increasing your score by increasing your accuracy. You should expect to get 90% of the calculated number correct and a 20% increase in your previous score is a dramatic increase. Then on the next test do the same thing and so and so forth.

I took the test every two weeks and made sure that during those 2 weeks I was not only studying, but doing at least 104 questions a day in MCAT. Like 52 physics questions and 52 chemistry question in the exam krackers 1001 series. I would also do 1-2 verbal sections a week (this is 7 passages for those who do not know how many passages there are in a verbal section). Verbal is not difficult, it may seem difficult, but you are only discouraging yourself for thinking that way. If there is any section to shine in it would be verbal because there isn't any outside knowledge you need to bring its all in the passage. Take advantage of that and try to build your stamina for this section. What I found helpful for verbal, this may seem silly, but I do all of mine on the computer and I will highlight an entire paragraph and read it then when I am done I will unhighlight, highlight what I find interest (eg. words I do not know or main ideas), then highlight the next passage. I have an extremely difficult time paying attention in verbal and there is something about the yellow highlight that just draws all my attention against the white background.

My trend
AAMC 3 6P 7V 3B
AAMC 4 6P 8V 7B
AAMC 5 8P 8V 8B
AAMC 7 8P 9V 9B
AAMC 8 10P 8V 9B
AAMC 9 13P 9V 12B
AAMC 10 13P 10V 13B
AAMC 11 TBD

Remember, test day is going to be stressful and you may not score ideally as you have on your practice, but you've prepared for this moment and if you build your confidence outside the test and make that test your bitch, well needless to say, you will do great. PM if you need any other advice.

I take my test July 6, so hopefully I'll be seeing you guys come the interview cycles
 
Interesting.

I don't see much value in skipping AAMC questions. Even if you miss them, you're able to track your mental thought and correct that with review.

Also, congratulations on your progress. Your scores will give people hope, including myself. However, you are an outlier. Adding 7 points to your test in 2 weeks isn't the norm. Quite impressive.
 
Great post, thanks bhandal! I found this very encouraging. I want to ask you a question:

For the aamc exams, I have the R versions for a lot of them. I usually don't have a problem with timing so I was thinking about doing these for the extra questions in them -- what do you think? I would have to do the R ones on paper versus the regular ones would be on a computer. I have the R for 3-7 so I thought it would be okay since I could do computer practice with 8-11 plus some kaplan exams.

Btw you did great progress! I did my first practice section yesterday from a kaplan exam and was discouraged at how many I got wrong, I really needed this 🙂
 
It is best if you get computer based versus paper, here is why: writing on the test is tempting and is unlikely the administrators will enjoy you writing on the test screen 😉. Secondly you want to using the strikeout, highlight, and mark buttons. Every time I take a test I'm sure to use these and 9/10 when I go review I've always narrowed it down 50/50, which is the best situation you can be in, other than 100% correct. Another thing is simply staring at a screen for five hours can be daunting. You want to be prepared for the test and no surprises. With all this being said I am completely on anybody side who is hesitant is spending too much money on trying to ace this test. If this is what you have then just go for it. Just please be sure to be meticulous whenever you practice on the computer.
 
Interesting.

I don't see much value in skipping AAMC questions. Even if you miss them, you're able to track your mental thought and correct that with review.

Also, congratulations on your progress. Your scores will give people hope, including myself. However, you are an outlier. Adding 7 points to your test in 2 weeks isn't the norm. Quite impressive.

I believe the 7 point increase came from knowing m hormones, the use of the highlighting technique for verbal, and studying the hell out of gen Chem . You have to think about it, there are some topics tested more than others. I made sure to create an excel spread sheet of all my test and all the common topics then I calculated how many questions were asked an how many got wrong. What I can do is share the topics that are tested most on for the test in my analysis of 4 aamc test:

*basis: any topic with a cumulative # of questions of >10 in no particular order.

Gen Chem:
-acids & bases
-periodic trends (these are subtle)
-kinetic equilibrium
-phases
-solution chemistry (van't hoff factor, etc)
-stoichipmetry
Thermodynamics

Physics
-atomic structure
-light and optics
-work and energy
-waves

Organic chem
-hydrocarbons
-oxygen containing compounds
- techniques

Biology
-circulatory
-digestive
-DNA and protein
-enzymes
-eukaryotic cell vs prokaryotic
-genetics
-nervous system
-reproductive system

Hope this helps
 
Bhandal
I am actually working on something like that before I saw your post. But not sure how many questions should I attempt. Did you use the same 20% increase formula for the verbal sections too? Right now my verbal 20/40 so I should attempt for 24 questions then 20% more and so on?
 
Last edited:
Yes that is correct so you would attempt 24 questions on your next test and guess on the rest. Just trust it do not try to over do it. If you got 90% of those questions correct that's 2 questions more than what you started. Also it may seem easy in the beginning, only answering 24 questions; however, once you take your next couple of test the amount will start to get more challenging, but by then you would have been prepared enough and have the confidence to move on. Also if you get to a point where you've answered 24 questions and you have yet to complete the rest of the questions you've just read, go ahead and answer them, it doesn't have to be precise. Hope that helps
 
I'm super happy it worked for you, and I wish I could wrap my head around it.

To me, though, it seems like it's wasting portions of full length materials. Also, it would seem to prolong your endurance.
 
Since you will be doing a comprehensive review of each and every test you do, no question is wasted. I guarantee reducing The number of questions you attempt will increase your score in it self. Eventually you will be able to do almost all. Mcat is a strategy test and to disregard this undeniable fact can be costly. A good book to read is mcat silver bullet, I think it's on amazon. It basically shows you how to eliminate answers based on certain words and organization.
 
Since you will be doing a comprehensive review of each and every test you do, no question is wasted. I guarantee reducing The number of questions you attempt will increase your score in it self. Eventually you will be able to do almost all. Mcat is a strategy test and to disregard this undeniable fact can be costly. A good book to read is mcat silver bullet, I think it's on amazon. It basically shows you how to eliminate answers based on certain words and organization.

(number correct in section * 20%) + number correct

So I took GS-5 on Sunday and got 36 right out of 52, then I should times 36 by 20% and then add 36 again to see how many questions I should get right the next time to increase my score?

I should get about 43 questions right on the next exam or should I attempt the 43 questions instead.
 
How do you know your improvement isn't just an artifact of attempting more of the problems? If you limit yourself to only giving 60% of the questions a good try and then guess at the rest, aren't you kind of guaranteeing you'll do better next time when you put in a greater effort?
 
You attempt 43 questions and plan to get 90% of those correct, so ~38-39 questions correct, which I believe is a 9 or 10 in that particular section
 
How do you know your improvement isn't just an artifact of attempting more of the problems? If you limit yourself to only giving 60% of the questions a good try and then guess at the rest, aren't you kind of guaranteeing you'll do better next time when you put in a greater effort?

I believe you are still missing the concept of the strategy. Of course attempting more questions will require more effort, but guessing on the rest of the questions will be the same as you trying to do the entire section. Even worse you would have missed questions that you should have gotten correct, but due to lack of time and concentration in the attempt to complete and read everything you would have missed the same amount, if not more.

What I tell everyone who is taking the mcat is that its your future and you want to be control of that, so take control of the test. Make sure there are no surprises and when it comes to scoring, don't be peaking at your score with one eye open hoping that you did well. If you use the strategies you should begin to feel how you did on a test because you confidence is high and you are in control of what questions you will do and the questions you don't know how to do.

Odds are if you took an mcat and you got 26 out of 52, you go back and you take another trying to use the strategy and you attempt 31 questions this time, but you finish with 10 mins left, you probably went to fast and missed some problems that you blew through. I started out with a 17 on the mcat and now consistently I can take a test and score between a 32-36. Now I can tell you that the fluctuation is not due to some crazy hard questions that they put in the test, because it is rare test makers will put stuff you've never seen before. It is due to the fact that I was probably going o fast and wasn't taking the test serious. This will happen and the point is to not get burnt out while studying.

Something that will definitely burn you out is scoring a 26 on an mcat taking another one after some rigorous studying and scoring a 23. Its counterproductive and discouraging, so the only way to perform better is to have a game plan in mind instead of, " I'm just going to study really really really hard this time and then Im going to get a 30 I know it!" This is the mindset of many students who take the test and all I can say to them is good luck because they will be sadly disappointed how much content knowing the content will only minimal impact. One more thing, come score release day there shouldn't any hesitation in what your score will be. You should be able to guesstimate +/- 2, usually -2 due to nerves, with a thorough understanding of your strengths and weaknesses. Don't get me wrong I take your argument in with good understanding how you feel: you don't want to waste a perfectly good questions on a practice exam, but you don't have to. Just guess on them and before you review your test just do them on a piece of paper for practice, that's what I did. Moral of the story you need a game plan, but there are only so many thing you can change on a test and on of the only things that you actually have control over is the amount of questions you attempt.
 
It was actually taught to me by some instructors who score 41+ on the MCAT, but again I am not here trying to enforce a concept on anybody just offering some advice I received from some mentors and it worked for me, so i am passing it along. Also i know a fair amount of people who can attest that no amount of studying could have prepared them for the mcat. You can know all the material and still do poorly on the test.
 
Last edited:
It was actually taught to me by some instructors who score 41+ on the MCAT, but again I am not here trying to enforce a concept on anybody just offering some advice I received from some mentors and it worked for me, so i am passing it along. Also i know I fair amount of people who can attest that no amount of studying could have prepared them for the mcat. You can know all the material and still do poorly on the test.

Fair enough. Thanks for contributing, I'm sure everyone will get at least some tidbit from your post.
 
After taking the MCAT twice and doing extremely poor, I am morreeeee than willing to try your approach! Thank you!

Sent from my LG-P999 using SDN Mobile
 
really good advice, thank you
one quick question...i am taking test in aug23 and have been taking prac test once a week. seeing very very slow improvements so i am ready to take your advice.

But i was wondering, because i am still learning the material as i study, wouldn't it not work for me to only attempt lets say 24 questions in a section. Maybe the first 24 i attempt , i have not yet covered in my studying yet.

I feel that your strategy (#3) would only work after all the content review is done and you are just practicing. Am i mistaken?

Thanks Bhandal!
 
I have another question about your technique that I just thought about. When attempting our # of questions, should we do all the discretes first because they don't require passages and should be easy points? Or is doing them in order for the science sections more important? I mean if I attempt to concentrate on 43 and guess on 9, shouldn't I at least make sure to do well on all discretes first?
 
thechase, I would say that you can being the technique now. Lets say you get to a circuits passage and you have no idea what circuits are, then skip it. You said that you are half way through your studying and you should be pretty fluid in many of the concepts. All though some more important concepts come up later, I would say targeting what you dont know is very important. So at the end of your diagnostic lets say you attempt 24 then you go back and review and see a question you could have answered, but you just guess, well then do the problem see if you get it right and just add that to your score. I hope everyone knows that the point of this is not to see a 36 when you score, the point is to narrow down what you don't know. Once you get something wrong enough you begin to see how to get it write.

aspiringdoc the answer is subjective to the test taker. If you can accurately answer FSQs fast, <20s, then I would say go for it, but be careful FSQs can become traps and time wasters if you are not comfortable in subject matter. I completely promote skiping around and personally I do the first two passages, FSQs, skip next two passages, then do FSQs then go back to passages. This is not always true, it's really how I feel at the time, if I feel really confident in progress thus far I will continue to passages, if need the extra points I will do FSQs.

PS to all SDN users: use my quizlet review of hormones,http://quizlet.com/11177872/mcat-hormone-review-flash-cards/

Having a firm understanding of the repercussions of hormone origins and fluctuations will alone increase your Bio score 1-2 points. THAT'S ONE TOPIC! Hormones are subtle and whether it be a discussion of water retention in the kidney or reproductive cycle, hormones will be a major topic covered. Everything you need to know about hormones can be found on that quizlet.
 
aspiringdoc the answer is subjective to the test taker. If you can accurately answer FSQs fast, <20s, then I would say go for it, but be careful FSQs can become traps and time wasters if you are not comfortable in subject matter. I completely promote skiping around and personally I do the first two passages, FSQs, skip next two passages, then do FSQs then go back to passages. This is not always true, it's really how I feel at the time, if I feel really confident in progress thus far I will continue to passages, if need the extra points I will do FSQs.

Cool. When I find myself running out of time (i.e. 10 min for 2 passages and FSQs), I go through and complete the FSQs first, then try to rush to complete the passages. Thanks again.
 
bhandal,

I just saw the link to the quizlet review of hormones... that's awesome, thanks! I've been compiling notecards of the hormones myself, but you're definitely right about hormones-- there will be plenty of questions covering them in some way or another.
 
Honestly half of this technique doesn't make much sense to me. Why would you NOT answer/attempt some questions? Why should you base how many you got correct on a previous test to determine how many you should answer on a next exam? It's more than likely your % correct will fluctuate. Say for example on one exam you got 80% correct and attempted 40/52 questions and on that FL ALL 40 you attempted were concepts you were still shaky on and your new % correct dropped to 60%. Are you saying you're only going to attempt 60% of the next exam? And isn't it also a bad idea to not answer questions. Even blindly guessing will get you points. Or are you saying attempt 40 questions which you think you know? But even that in and of it self is a huge time waster because you would have to scan through the entire exam to find questions that you know/somewhat know.
 
Is this an attempt to sabotage people with a strategy that's silly and timeconsuming (being frank here): highlighting as you read, then highlighting again? lol. Then doing a portion of the exam questions and guessing the rest? :S ROFLMAO
 
I'm glad I'm not the only one to doubt this. Thought I was crazy.

It really seems to sell yourself short if you're not taking advantage of all of the practice full length material.
 
Honestly half of this technique doesn't make much sense to me. Why would you NOT answer/attempt some questions? Why should you base how many you got correct on a previous test to determine how many you should answer on a next exam? It's more than likely your % correct will fluctuate. Say for example on one exam you got 80% correct and attempted 40/52 questions and on that FL ALL 40 you attempted were concepts you were still shaky on and your new % correct dropped to 60%. Are you saying you're only going to attempt 60% of the next exam? And isn't it also a bad idea to not answer questions. Even blindly guessing will get you points. Or are you saying attempt 40 questions which you think you know? But even that in and of it self is a huge time waster because you would have to scan through the entire exam to find questions that you know/somewhat know.

This technique was given to me by a princeton review instructor who scored a 44 on the mcat on 3 consecutive occasions. I had the same questions as you in the beginning, but the logic is that you would more possibly get the questions wrong any way if you didn't know the concept, so the best way to approach PRACTICE test, not the real thing, is to focus on topics you know or are comfortable with. If one finds that difficult then there are some fundamental identification issues that need to be addressed before further studying should be undertaken. I think a lot of people taking the mcat are misguided thinking its all about facts and questions, when truly its about logical thinking on basic science topics. However, this realization is the hardest feat to accomplish. Of course you would place a guess answer on questions you don't attempt, NEVER leave a question blank. The purpose of the technique is to build your confidence in the topics you know and to guide you in to the topics you need further review. For example you take an AAMC and score a 28/52 on a section you would go over the questions you got CORRECT to affirm you thought processes. Then go over the questions you got INCORRECT. DO NOT use the explanations provided by the AAMC. Find other material or even better try to reason the correct answer in your head, with proper science of course. Once you have completed you can now say "okay I know I am good in kinematics questions so I don't need to spend much time reviewing that, but I am poor in circuits so I need to focus on that and also... You then calculate 28*20%= ~6 questions and add that to what you got correct which is 34 questions. You then attempt 34 questions and try to get at least 31 correct (i.e. 90%) out of 52. What you have created is a system of periodic attempt to increase your score with a strategic plan focused around your strengths, which gives you an edge on the exam. Nothing is more disappointing than scoring a 24 on an exam studying 40 hours and taking another exam to score a 23-25. This is discouraging and counter productive. The MCAT is all about the simple science and if you look at a questions and say okay I have no idea what the F*** this question just said, but let me look for some key words like volt/potential or amp or farad, then I know I am talking about circuits and I try to assemble a solution from the knowledge I do have on the questions. This especially helps in biology since it will be very rare that they plain out ask you what is the first stage of meiosis. They will give you some case study that is convoluted with information that has a quick note on crossing over of genetic material then they phrase a questions asking what stage of meiosis are you in. Well, most students would start analyzing the data presented when in truth all you had to realize its where cross in over occurs which is prophase I. I swear every single question is like this and if you can effectively identify the topic quickly paired with a fair amount of content review, you are golden. Again everything I have provided is a guide that helped me score a 34. There are a 10^6 techniques out there and they all have their basis. I would appreciate it if other users commenting on this thread would take this in to account as they decide to write negative comments that turn away other users who could benefit from the posted strategy. We are all here for a reason and thats to get in to med school, so productive criticism is more than welcome, like the quote I posted above that asks great questions of curiosity and concern. Please post any other questions.

P.S. regarding the wasting of test. The material is not wasted, you can always retake specific sections, only 52 questions to attempt questions you never attempted. Timing is not as important as accuracy IN THE BEGINNING. Get the score you want consecutively then start cutting time by learning shortcuts. Many would say, "wow this must take a long time," studying for any graduate exam takes a long time and its really what approach you decide to take: strategy or memorizing equations. The truth is that strategy in part encompasses a fair amount of learning just from reviewing past exams; however, memorizing and reading then taking a test is like trying to get you car out of black ice with a low coefficient of static friction, that's right... I went there....
 
I got an embarrassingly low score on a full length yesterday.

As much as I'd like to try this, if it doesn't work I'm out of time and screwed.
 
PSA:

This is why people do practice problems, i.e. to figure out weak points.

If you want to try a strategy like this, then you better have a bunch of 3rd party tests like gold standard, kaplan, tpr, or tbr.

Do not waste aamcs doing this. By the time you start AAMC's you should not have any glaring weaknesses, just a few things that you happen to be a little worse at.
 
Top