• Pharmacy Job Market Webinar

    Are you considering applying to pharmacy school but are concerned about job prospects when you graduate? Join us on Wednesday, July 28th at 8 PM Eastern to hear from three PharmDs about their experiences and options outside of retail pharmacy.

Richter915

Full Member
10+ Year Member
7+ Year Member
Feb 18, 2007
153
0
Status (Visible)
I had a quick question in regards to the structure of the writing section. Kaplan breaks it down into three basic tasks...explanation of prompt + example, counterexample, and something else. It's this third task I'm having trouble understanding. Often times he'll tell us that the third task is the most important but he won't explain what it entails. So my question is just that, on any MCAT prompt, what is the third task asking of us. To make things a little easier, let's say the prompt is: "a candidate's personal life should not influence the way people vote for him or her" Thanks.
 

abyssinianson

Junior Member
10+ Year Member
5+ Year Member
May 18, 2005
51
0
Status (Visible)
I had a quick question in regards to the structure of the writing section. Kaplan breaks it down into three basic tasks...explanation of prompt + example, counterexample, and something else. It's this third task I'm having trouble understanding. Often times he'll tell us that the third task is the most important but he won't explain what it entails. So my question is just that, on any MCAT prompt, what is the third task asking of us. To make things a little easier, let's say the prompt is: "a candidate's personal life should not influence the way people vote for him or her" Thanks.

the last part of the essay requirement wants you to state a set of conditions that would make the statement true. so, for example, your statement might be addressed the following way to fulfill the last task: a candidate's personal life should not influence the way people vote for him/ her when their progress and accomplishments as a public servant strongly emphasizes the best interests of the people. Provide one concrete example where this applies in real life. Use actual examples of events to serve as your examples and you should do fine. I have a typed set of steps that I used to tackle the writing sample and I can email that to you if it'll help. It is a basic case of plug 'n chug and I did pretty well on the writing sample using the systematic approach.
 

SunshineNYC

SunshineNYC
10+ Year Member
Jan 30, 2007
155
0
NYC
Status (Visible)
  1. Pre-Medical
I had a quick question in regards to the structure of the writing section. Kaplan breaks it down into three basic tasks...explanation of prompt + example, counterexample, and something else. It's this third task I'm having trouble understanding. Often times he'll tell us that the third task is the most important but he won't explain what it entails. So my question is just that, on any MCAT prompt, what is the third task asking of us. To make things a little easier, let's say the prompt is: "a candidate's personal life should not influence the way people vote for him or her" Thanks.

Yeah, they are not totally clear. It is always phrased like, "What determines whether..." So unclear! Anyway, in task three just make sure to come up with some criteria. How are we measuring the truth of the statement? In your case maybe you would talk about how many votes are swayed by a recent personal scandal. Maybe you talked abou a scandal in task 2, and here is the time to address what the measureable results of that scandal are. How many votes changed from the poll before the scandal to the actual election. Then you can take it a level deeper for a perfect score and tie in how it could be dangerous if people vote this way because then they might miss more important issues (which maybe you already discussed in task 1 or 2), just make sure to tie everything together in task three while addressing task three and taking it one level deeper than just scratching the surface. Have it relate to your example, but then also on some sort of universal scale if possible.

Good luck.
 

Richter915

Full Member
10+ Year Member
7+ Year Member
Feb 18, 2007
153
0
Status (Visible)
ah I see, you guys cleared it up. I guess my problem is that I explain my criteria in paragraphs I and II because it makes sense for me to do that naturally. I guess I should hold that off and let that be my third paragraph. Thanks for the help.
 
About the Ads

poly800rock

Member
10+ Year Member
Jul 15, 2006
189
1
Status (Visible)
i think if you have a formal stylized writing, than you should just stick with that. Kaplan really teaches you to do this and that, but it really isn't the best way imo. I wrote about bodycount's "copkiller" song for the august test and did pretty well..."P"....so as long as your actual writing and grammar are good, your example/counterexamples could really be about anything as long as you write like you know what you're talking about...
 
This thread is more than 14 years old.

Your message may be considered spam for the following reasons:

  1. Your new thread title is very short, and likely is unhelpful.
  2. Your reply is very short and likely does not add anything to the thread.
  3. Your reply is very long and likely does not add anything to the thread.
  4. It is very likely that it does not need any further discussion and thus bumping it serves no purpose.
  5. Your message is mostly quotes or spoilers.
  6. Your reply has occurred very quickly after a previous reply and likely does not add anything to the thread.
  7. This thread is locked.