MD match vs. DO match???????????

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

roughgod

Member
10+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
20+ Year Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2001
Messages
72
Reaction score
0
-What is the difference between the two matches?

-Are there any differences among the residency programs each match has to offer?

-Is one advantageous to the other?

-Why some DO grads pass on their DO matched spot just to get into an MD match spot?

-What should one consider when applying to the match?
Thanks
 
I think the top reason that DOs choose to do a MD residency vs. a DO residency is that there are many more MD residencies. Thus, you have more control in terms of where you do residency. Those in my class that have applied for the DO match usually do so for the transitional year, before they begin their specialty training through the allopathic match. Being able to do an osteopathic transitional year is a significant advantage in CA because there are so few spots available in the allopathic match.
Other reasons include the opportunity to do residency at say UCSF, Stanford, Yale, Columbia, etc... I am only citing reasons that I am aware of in my class, I can't speak for everyone else.
Which match you do is ultimately up to what you want to do with your career. Some DOs who want to do FP or Ortho Surg, find the additional training in OMM and muscloskeletal medicine to be a very valuable asset. Those that decide to do Radiology, Neurosurgery, General Surgery, or Emergency Medicine are more like to try to go through both matches until they land a spot. Some people want the prestige of having gone to a place like the Mayo Clinic, Harvard, Hopkins, etc...
I wouldn't say there is a significant advantage to either. Both will teach you what you need to learn and provide you with the license to practice in that field. If you want to subspecialize in IM, I would recommend trying to get into a prestigious program that has fellowships in the field you want to go into.
All in all, I would say that the top reason to completely bypass the DO match is due to location. More and more programs are becoming dually accredited now. For example, it is widely known that to get a residency spot at one of UC Irvine's affiliate Residencies in either the transitional year or the Family Practice residency, it is easier to go through the DO match. They offer spots through both the Allopathic and the Osteopathic match for the exact same residency. The degree and the residency are exactly the same. Additionally, if you fail to match through the osteopathic match, you can apply again though the allopathic match. I can't remember the other schools that have this same situation but the numbers are increasing. I saw a list posted on one of the threads on SDN. Hope this helps, and don't worry about the match yet. You've got plenty of time.
 
Thanks for your input Leo.
I know it is too early for me to be thinking of all that right now, but I have learned one thing going through applying to med schools and all: never is too early!

What is a transitional year? Is that an additional year of residency when going through a DO res. program?

And depending on what match you get your residency, do the degrees differ from one another?
 
Here's another question...when you finish residency with a dual accreditation, are you eligible to take the exam to become certified by both boards, or can you only be certified by the board through which you matched? In other words, if I as a DO student were to match through the DO match to a dual-accredited residency (say in surgery) would I be eligible to become both a FACS and a FACOS?
 
Regarding Dual certification:

It doesn't matter which match you apply through. If ANY program is dual accredited (AOA and ACGME) then you can take BOTH sets of boards,if you want to.

FP ,EM and Peds are the best examples, I don't know of any dual certified surgery programs.
 
I've heard it said by others on this board that it is harder for DO's who do osteopathic residencies to obtain job positions. I guess many hospitals and practices strongly prefer physicians coming out of allopathic residencies. Can anyone either confirm or deny this?
 
I can only speak from personal experience, but the attendings and residents I've worked with who did DO residencies had no problems finding a job. As long as you're board certified (or eligible) it doesn't seem to matter.

Also, regarding board certification, things are a little more complicated than you might think. For example, I recently learned that
even though I'll be doing an allopathic neuro residency, if I do an osteopathic internship I can only sit for the DO neuro boards. This makes absolutely no sense, but it's true...I called the MD neuro board myself. Now, it doesn't matter to me which board certifies me, but my residency wants me to take the allopathic boards so I have no choice but to do an allopathic internship. I don't know how many specialties have these types of requirements but it might be a good idea to check with your specialty board to make sure you understand all of their rules and regulations.
 
Neurogirl ---

Not doing an osteopathic internship limits your practice rights in certain states . . .am I right? Is that your concern regarding if you decide to do an allopathic internship?
 
There are 5 states that still require the DO internship. However, some of these only "officially" require it, meaning that if you do an allopathic internship, as long as you complete the required rotations, they'll grant you licensure.

The main reason I wanted to do a DO internship is because I was offered one by my 3rd yr core hospital. It's a great facility and I already know (and like) everyone there. It would have made life easier.
 
Top