MD who refuses adapt to technology (e-scribing state)

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Joined
Oct 12, 2015
Messages
1,576
Reaction score
1,537
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
This story has been terribly misreported. Go look up the doctor's actual sanction by the medical board, it was 100% malpractice related. She had the patient taking oral theophylline for asthma without taking any levels. He developed a fever, which she treated with aspirin, and tachycardia which she treated with digoxin twice a a day. The mother got mad and reported her to a medical board.

She was required to refer all pediatric arrhythmias to a pediatric cardiologist upon diagnosis (shocker) and to complete like 8 extra CEs in the fields that she totally ****ed up the diagnosis for. She refused to do so, and voluntarily surrendered her license in a pouty fit. Then went to the news to share her story about "they don't like that I don't use computers" - No, it's that they didn't like that she's using medicine from 1943 that isn't safe.

Also, the fact that she doesn't check a PDMP means she clearly would never have patients on inappropriate doses of opioids.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6 users
What CynicalIntern said. Her not keeping electronic records had nothing to do with her getting her license pulled.....although inadequate record keeping was mentioned by the board, with electronic records as a potential remedy, this was just an afterthought. The real problem was that she was using state of the art 1950's medicine to treat patients! As CynicalIntern mentioned, the main complainant was the parent of a child treated from ages 2 - 7 years...

The woman is 86 years old, and apparently stubborn. Even if she did the fluffiest required CE possible, how could she *NOT* know from media reports (in newspapers, TV's, etc.) that one doesn't treat fever in children with aspirin?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Members don't see this ad :)
Yes, this was very very briefly touched upon in the article about the malpractice/complaints filed against her. I thought this article seemed very misleading since physicians can gain waivers for e scribing (the lack/neglect of PMP monitoring however seems quite justified though)

I wonder how much tranylcypromine, phenelzine, etc. she Rx'ed...barbiturates as "sleep aids", etc. This MD arguably lives in a cave
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Doctor denied license because she can't use a computer | Daily Mail Online

Absolutely no jokes comparing Polish using horses in WW2 allowed.

"One patient who suffered a stroke and was confined to a wheelchair told WMUR9, 'I wouldn't have my life without her.'

Another patient said doctors had him on seven different medications and with Konopka he's down to just one and it has been working."

That part was extremely worrying.
How long until that guy dies of another stroke?

Also, why is it that every doctor that "people who have run out of options go to" is a giant quack?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
"One patient who suffered a stroke and was confined to a wheelchair told WMUR9, 'I wouldn't have my life without her.'

Another patient said doctors had him on seven different medications and with Konopka he's down to just one and it has been working."

That part was extremely worrying.
How long until that guy dies of another stroke?

Also, why is it that every doctor that "people who have run out of options go to" is a giant quack?

Statistics, she takes patients that no one else will because it screws their scorecard. To wit:

1. I knew surgeons who would carry their own blood packets into surgeries so that if there was a complication, it would not need to be entered into the ARC system for blood use (and not count against them). I really got pissed at this practice as it breaks all reasonable precautions about testing with Path as well as royally messing up our blood ration requests to ARC (as the DoD and VA get special consideration for blood and blood products). ARC and CMS only clamped down on this practice in the last year or so.

2. Along with their own hospitalists, keep brainstem-dead patients on life support until 48 hours had passed to evade CMS postsurgical complication death reports. VA no longer tolerates specialist directed internal medicine service requests without written justification.

(Reason I pick on surgeons in this case is that their cases are fairly straightforward to explain, there's other ways to do this in IM and Peds, but they are a bit more involved and not obvious.)

If you know you have a trainwreck that you can't recoup your CPT reimbursement, you figure out a way to dump them. In this lady's defense, she really doesn't care about those statistics, so she would take cases where no one would. Ben Carson is also that kind of surgeon, who would take cases that no one else would, because he didn't give a damn about his statistics. That thinking has both its merits and demerits. On the demerit side, there are truly hopeless cases that don't justify the resources, and if you work in a place where bean counting is a thing, then you just can't take those patients, but JHU isn't one of those places yet. On the merit side, you do make miracles happen at the expense that your routine statistics are atrocious limiting your reimbursement and raising your malpractice rates.

It says something about the practice systems of medicine in general though that despite her losing her practice skill, that more harm did not happen. You can actually have a quack and not come to harm most of the time. Not something I'd actually want to say to reassure people, but modernity does bring life support benefits that our grandparents did not have.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
Top