Measles

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Controversial in the medical profession, but I do think from an evolutionary standpoint it's worth considering the long game, end point of vaccination strategy in the broadest sense. We don't seem to be able to replicably eradicate disease. Perhaps it's worthwhile if we suppress prevalence to such low levels that rarely present. However, relying on a general population with choice is challenging if not impossible. Maybe it's the best we have for the time being. I think respecting people's skepticism is warranted. With red dye banned, is Kool-Aid still around?

Do you make health considerations for your family based on the long game of humanity?

Of course not.

You can't say anything else either. But of course knowing you, you'll come back with a 2 paragraph, 12 sentence reply.
 
I am so over this. I had a patient the other day tell me this and I asked them to show me their Kaplan-Meier curves. They looked at me dumbfounded and asked what that was. I told them that it was a simple way to show how your experimental data compared to the control data and helped you draw conclusions from your research.

Another blank stare.

“Yeah, I just read some stuff on Newsmax and Truth Social.”

Yea I sometimes want to make people feel bad too, I so want to. They do no research except for what they get on the "For You" tab in Twitter.

You know the issue is that most doctors have a hard time fully understanding the research journal articles. I'm in that boat. You almost have to dedicate your career to epidemiology and statistics to really have a solid grasp on health study design.
 
What the F is a Koplik spot lol

it's a word I heard thrice in medical school way long ago
Koplik spots are a distinctive and pathognomonic sign of measles, appearing 1-4 days before the characteristic measles rash23. These spots manifest as small, white lesions on the buccal mucosa (inner cheek), often described as resembling "grains of salt on a reddish background"14. They typically appear opposite the upper molars but can extend to the entire buccal mucosa2.


Key features of Koplik spots include:

  1. Timing: They occur early in the course of measles, during the prodromal phase13.
  2. Appearance: Bright red spots with white or bluish-white centers4.
  3. Location: Primarily on the buccal mucosa, but can also occur on the conjunctiva, vaginal mucosa, or gastrointestinal mucosa3.
  4. Prevalence: Observed in up to 70% of measles cases26.
  5. Duration: They usually disappear as the characteristic maculopapular rash develops1.
Koplik spots are crucial for early measles detection and outbreak control. Their presence before the skin rash allows for timely isolation of infected individuals, helping to limit the spread of this highly contagious disease1. Healthcare providers should be vigilant in looking for Koplik spots, as they can be identified before the onset of the rash, requiring a comprehensive oral examination2.


It's important to note that measles is a serious illness that can lead to complications, especially in young children and babies7. Vaccination remains the most effective way to prevent measles and its associated complications.
 
Every person has to make their own healthcare decisions which is based on many factors that are subjective. Being a doc, I am more educated than most which gives me a different view. Do vax work? Of course. Does that mean I have to get every single recommended Vax? Of course NOT.

Did I get Covid shot? Of course. Did I get boosters? Of course not.
Did I get the Flu shots pre covid? Of course. Did I get flu shots after Covid? NOPE. Just tired of getting stuck. I will just deal with flu symptoms until I feel like it. Do I think it is prob better to get the flu shot yearly? Of course. Do I think eating healthy is good? Of course. Do I always eat healthy? Of course not. See.... its the same thing

So just because someone/docs are not vax vigilant, doesn't mean they are vax deniers. Just like if I didn't eat healthy all the time doesn't mean I am a flat slob. Moderation in EVERYTHING is the best course.
 
Every person has to make their own healthcare decisions which is based on many factors that are subjective. Being a doc, I am more educated than most which gives me a different view. Do vax work? Of course. Does that mean I have to get every single recommended Vax? Of course NOT.

Does anyone else cringe when they read someone with a terminal degree using the term “vax” like they’re some tiktok tradwife or a boomer posting misinformation memes on a Facebook group? Oh well. At least it’s a bit of a shortcut to knowing how likely someone is to be well-informed and/or able/willing to engage in intellectually serious conversation about the topic.
 
Oh sorry that I use shortcuts when I post. Maybe I should just say Jab? 🙂


Sad someone can be so judgy over use of the English language on a message board. A little uptight aren't we? Should I use LatinX to appease your self righteousness?
 
Controversial in the medical profession, but I do think from an evolutionary standpoint it's worth considering the long game, end point of vaccination strategy in the broadest sense. We don't seem to be able to replicably eradicate disease. Perhaps it's worthwhile if we suppress prevalence to such low levels that rarely present. However, relying on a general population with choice is challenging if not impossible. Maybe it's the best we have for the time being. I think respecting people's skepticism is warranted. With red dye banned, is Kool-Aid still around?
Small pox would like a word.

Polio is close, basically is outside of Pakistan and Afghanistan.

We HAD eradicated measles in this country but for some strange reason it's showing back up.
 
Does anyone else cringe when they read someone with a terminal degree using the term “vax” like they’re some tiktok tradwife or a boomer posting misinformation memes on a Facebook group? Oh well. At least it’s a bit of a shortcut to knowing how likely someone is to be well-informed and/or able/willing to engage in intellectually serious conversation about the topic.

You're probably pretty fun at parties.


 
I think people have forgotten that measles is reasonably virulent, and has one of the highest infectious indicies of any known virus.

It killed around 100,000 in 2023 with ~10,000,000 infections. The majority of deaths are in children under 5, mostly due to pneumonia.

Mortality would probably be lower here due to better supportive care than the third world, but why the f*ck would you want to find out.

 
Small pox would like a word.

Polio is close, basically is outside of Pakistan and Afghanistan.

We HAD eradicated measles in this country but for some strange reason it's showing back up.
Fair enough. I would put measles into that same category given it's R naught contributing to it's morbidity and mortality. I used replicably in the sentence you bolded to point out that vaccination as a strategy to mitigate all viral disease hasn't proved universally successful. Overpopulation of humans in close proximity, globalization, the fast rate of mutation of viral disease, and a less healthy population kept alive artificially by modern medicine contribute to this challenge. I think some question the overarching strategy of immunization for everything even if intermittently successful (i.e. small pox, polio, measles, etc. - also unclear in some cases if temporary), primarily when we try to enforce mass immunization of less effective vaccines on healthy individuals for diseases without as severe morbidity/mortality. Herd immunity plays a roll, but is in direct confrontation with individual freedom. I recognize this is more so a philosophical discussion given our current contentious environment. Ultimately, I doubt many of us in this forum disagree significantly on this topic as we realize it does have some nuance.
 
I think people have forgotten that measles is reasonably virulent, and has one of the highest infectious indicies of any known virus.

It killed around 100,000 in 2023 with ~10,000,000 infections. The majority of deaths are in children under 5, mostly due to pneumonia.

Mortality would probably be lower here due to better supportive care than the third world, but why the f*ck would you want to find out.


Yea but those 100,000 deaths are in countries were people live in dirt homes and they don't even have a word for "hospital" in their native language.
 
Fair enough. I would put measles into that same category given it's R naught contributing to it's morbidity and mortality. I used replicably in the sentence you bolded to point out that vaccination as a strategy to mitigate all viral disease hasn't proved universally successful. Overpopulation of humans in close proximity, globalization, the fast rate of mutation of viral disease, and a less healthy population kept alive artificially by modern medicine contribute to this challenge. I think some question the overarching strategy of immunization for everything even if intermittently successful (i.e. small pox, polio, measles, etc. - also unclear in some cases if temporary), primarily when we try to enforce mass immunization of less effective vaccines on healthy individuals for diseases without as severe morbidity/mortality. Herd immunity plays a roll, but is in direct confrontation with individual freedom. I recognize this is more so a philosophical discussion given our current contentious environment. Ultimately, I doubt many of us in this forum disagree significantly on this topic as we realize it does have some nuance.
If it's an infection that after getting it once you generally won't get it again (polio, MMR, probably chicken pox, Hep A and B) we absolutely can get rid of it with mass vaccination.

Otherwise you're correct.
 
Yea but those 100,000 deaths are in countries were people live in dirt homes and they don't even have a word for "hospital" in their native language.
Someone's banking really heavily on our health care system surviving the loss of its biggest payor and the destruction of the social safety net. I live in a large urban area and I have significant doubts about the pediatric emergency system being able to absorb a bad flu year without excess mortality, let alone a measle epidemic.
 
Someone's banking really heavily on our health care system surviving the loss of its biggest payor and the destruction of the social safety net. I live in a large urban area and I have significant doubts about the pediatric emergency system being able to absorb a bad flu year without excess mortality, let alone a measle epidemic.
I work close to one of the children’s meccas with multiple other children’s teaching EDs in biking, nay, jogging distance. 4! Of them, until one got shut down to make room for more profitable adult elective surgical cases.

So 3 local tertiary teaching hospitals with pediatric EDs inpatient peds solid residencies for peds and if we get a bad RSV wave they are begging us to ship babies out of state and / or hold infants on HFNC for 24hr or longer in community hospital EDs with zero peds in the hospital. There is no surge space, no capacity, no help coming.

I have no faith our pedi infrastructure can deal with ANY meaningful surge in childhood illness. Especially something as damned contagious as measles.
 
Also team, measles does that multi-year immune memory wipe thing! Where your immune system gets suppressed and you are more susceptible to all sorts of illnesses you’ve previously had.

This sounds like some I personally do not want at all. At alllllllllll. And I’d rather not have a significant portion of the population have it either.
 
Fair enough. I would put measles into that same category given it's R naught contributing to it's morbidity and mortality. I used replicably in the sentence you bolded to point out that vaccination as a strategy to mitigate all viral disease hasn't proved universally successful. Overpopulation of humans in close proximity, globalization, the fast rate of mutation of viral disease, and a less healthy population kept alive artificially by modern medicine contribute to this challenge. I think some question the overarching strategy of immunization for everything even if intermittently successful (i.e. small pox, polio, measles, etc. - also unclear in some cases if temporary), primarily when we try to enforce mass immunization of less effective vaccines on healthy individuals for diseases without as severe morbidity/mortality. Herd immunity plays a roll, but is in direct confrontation with individual freedom. I recognize this is more so a philosophical discussion given our current contentious environment. Ultimately, I doubt many of us in this forum disagree significantly on this topic as we realize it does have some nuance.
But, as a scientist, you should acknowledge that certain viruses such as measles, mumps, polio, and smallpox can be eradicated as they only exist in nature through human reservoirs.

This is not philosophy. This is not about freedom. This is willful ignorance of scientific data for the sake of Idiocracy.

Edit: I don’t mean to direct this specifically towards you especially since you haven’t been espousing anti-vaccine “facts”, but moreso to the wider audience of educated people who embrace and spread misinformation that is perhaps more damaging by virtue of their credentials.
 
Last edited:
If the MMR was in pill form, does that change your decision making? What about if there was a reliable flu or COVID vaccine in oral form? I think we need to acknowledge as a society that people are stupid about injections and adjust accordingly. You'd still have the breatharian, sun cult energy healing people, but they're niche. The idea that other people should definitely suffer and die and you and yours should have a small but increased risk of badness to avoid temporary, mild discomfort needs to be purged from widespread society. There needs to be massive, multiplatform campaigns regarding vaccinations. Non-medical TV shows having plotlines revolving around catastrophic consequences of refusing vaccines, TikToks on everyones' feeds that message out the reasons to get vaccinated. We have to stop accepting that damaging society for perceived personal gain is the norm and start fighting back.
 
If the MMR was in pill form, does that change your decision making? What about if there was a reliable flu or COVID vaccine in oral form? I think we need to acknowledge as a society that people are stupid about injections and adjust accordingly. You'd still have the breatharian, sun cult energy healing people, but they're niche. The idea that other people should definitely suffer and die and you and yours should have a small but increased risk of badness to avoid temporary, mild discomfort needs to be purged from widespread society. There needs to be massive, multiplatform campaigns regarding vaccinations. Non-medical TV shows having plotlines revolving around catastrophic consequences of refusing vaccines, TikToks on everyones' feeds that message out the reasons to get vaccinated. We have to stop accepting that damaging society for perceived personal gain is the norm and start fighting back.
Amen. People are so dumb.
 
The problem is that you are
If the MMR was in pill form, does that change your decision making? What about if there was a reliable flu or COVID vaccine in oral form? I think we need to acknowledge as a society that people are stupid about injections and adjust accordingly. You'd still have the breatharian, sun cult energy healing people, but they're niche. The idea that other people should definitely suffer and die and you and yours should have a small but increased risk of badness to avoid temporary, mild discomfort needs to be purged from widespread society. There needs to be massive, multiplatform campaigns regarding vaccinations. Non-medical TV shows having plotlines revolving around catastrophic consequences of refusing vaccines, TikToks on everyones' feeds that message out the reasons to get vaccinated. We have to stop accepting that damaging society for perceived personal gain is the norm and start fighting back.
The problem is that Measles is not the same as COVID for vaccination purposes. We have no sterilizing vaccine for COVID (or influenza). It is impossible to wipe out with current technologies. The government basically forced people to get a poorly effective vaccine (didn't prevent spread, or transmission) that had limited safety data, and statistically no benefit for a large portion of the population. This scandal has led to vaccine hesitancy. Try to convince the average person in Arkansas now that they should get any vaccinations after the deception and fraud of the last 5 years. It's going to take a lot of time, effort and actual science to rebuild the public's trust in our public health agencies.
 
The problem is that you are

The problem is that Measles is not the same as COVID for vaccination purposes. We have no sterilizing vaccine for COVID (or influenza). It is impossible to wipe out with current technologies. The government basically forced people to get a poorly effective vaccine (didn't prevent spread, or transmission) that had limited safety data, and statistically no benefit for a large portion of the population. This scandal has led to vaccine hesitancy. Try to convince the average person in Arkansas now that they should get any vaccinations after the deception and fraud of the last 5 years. It's going to take a lot of time, effort and actual science to rebuild the public's trust in our public health agencies.
Sorry dude, but vaccine hesitancy existed way before COVID and it’s widespread adoption among segments of society has far more to do with social media creating echo chambers and being consciously influenced by malign actors than the performance characteristics of any vaccine. It’s a bad faith argument that we need more science to get people to accept vaccines when it wasn’t the lack of science that caused the hesitancy.
 
The problem is that you are

The problem is that Measles is not the same as COVID for vaccination purposes. We have no sterilizing vaccine for COVID (or influenza). It is impossible to wipe out with current technologies. The government basically forced people to get a poorly effective vaccine (didn't prevent spread, or transmission) that had limited safety data, and statistically no benefit for a large portion of the population. This scandal has led to vaccine hesitancy. Try to convince the average person in Arkansas now that they should get any vaccinations after the deception and fraud of the last 5 years. It's going to take a lot of time, effort and actual science to rebuild the public's trust in our public health agencies.

This is untrue.
 
This is untrue.

Would love to know how it's untrue.
We can't wipe out either virus right now.
The government overreach was so heavy-handed that the current administration is walking it back and undo-ing a lot of the prior administration's actions.
The safety data was limited (my wife used to work in the vaccine design department at Merck [hated it] and her contacts there were really confused as to just how this was being done).
The benefit (you either didn't contract the virus or recovered handily) is questionable in a virus with over a 99.X% recovery rate.
 
Sorry dude, but vaccine hesitancy existed way before COVID and it’s widespread adoption among segments of society has far more to do with social media creating echo chambers and being consciously influenced by malign actors than the performance characteristics of any vaccine. It’s a bad faith argument that we need more science to get people to accept vaccines when it wasn’t the lack of science that caused the hesitancy.

Vaccine hesitancy existed way before COVID, yes - but I don't think that's the argument he is making.
 
I’m just horrified that in 2025, on a student physician website, we are debating vaccines.

smh

It's a worthwhile debate.
We can all agree that we like preserving quality of life, and like avoiding unnecessary death.

Most of us don't like it when the government tells us how to practice medicine, but there are some bootlickers on here.

If the government makes claims about an intervention, any intervention, the burden of proof is upon them to demonstrate their claim.
 
I’m just horrified that in 2025, on a student physician website, we are debating vaccines.

smh
I mean – the vaccines that have been around since we were kids? Nah. The whole "just asking questions" crowd is deliberately avoiding educating themselves off the fossil record.

The new vaccines? Sure. Totally reasonable to have ongoing safety evaluations – like, for example, the J&J COVID vaccine provisional approval that ultimately needed to be pulled when safety signals developed (and we had better alternatives). The debate around the general utility of mRNA COVID vaccines in adolescents, particularly adolescent males, following adverse event reports. The new RSV vaccines need to have ongoing safety evaluations. Etc., etc.

When we have members of Congress up there promoting measles parties, we know we're in the stupidest timeline.
 
I’m just horrified that in 2025, on a student physician website, we are debating vaccines.

smh
Why can't we debate vaccines? Some have efficacy and benefit (polio), while others are either unnecessary or harmful. The big payday for pharma companies is to get a vaccine on the childhood vaccination schedule which guarantees a stream of pure profit indefinitely. That's why childhood vaccines have gone from a handful, to 30+ in the last 40 years. I can point to the Hepatitis B vaccine as a glaring example. Not something we should be given to infants. We should limit vaccines in the developing immune system to the bare minimum that are necessary for young childhood.
 
Depends on the vaccine. Stuff for adults? I don't give a damn anymore.

But if you are a doctor who takes care of kids on a regular basis and you discourage parents from getting the routine childhood vaccines, that's a problem.

As a rheumatologist, I am surprised to see the blase sentiment around here regarding vaccines.

I’m basically in the business of making people immunocompromised. And you’d better believe that I’ve seen how bad things get when immunocompromised people don’t get vaccinated, and get sick. I’ve recently - as in the last few months - had patients get CoVID, pertussis or influenza and end up in the hospital. So you’d better believe I encourage people to get vaccinated - and I’m up to date on vaccines myself. And I’m surprised as hell that so many doctors don’t think this is necessary, and don’t care to promote it to patients.

It’s disappointing, really. Depressing also.
 
Last edited:
I can point to the Hepatitis B vaccine as a glaring example.
Please enlighten us with your informed analysis of the specific negative impact of HBV vaccination in the context of its purpose in eradicating symptomatic HBV infection – and the dire effect of "vaccines in the developing immune system".
 
As a rheumatologist, I am surprised to see the blase sentiment around here regarding vaccines.

I’m basically in the business of making people immunocompromised. And you’d better believe that I’ve seen how bad things get when immunocompromised people don’t get vaccinated, and get sick. I’ve recently - as in the last few months - had patients get CoVID, pertussis or influenza and end up in the hospital. So you’d better believe I encourage people to get vaccinated - and I’m up to date on vaccines myself. And I’m surprised as hell that so many doctors don’t think this is necessary, and don’t care to promote it to patients.

It’s disappointing, really. Depressing also.

I don't disagree, amigo - it's the "government overreach" that bothers me in particular.

COVID had a 99%+ recovery rate.
I'm fit, young, and healthy.
Seemed unnecessary for me.
Maybe I'd get it anyways.
Wife was very underwhelmed by what her people back at Merck were saying about the data.

But facing being fired for opting out?
That's not okay.
 
As a rheumatologist, I am surprised to see the blase sentiment around here regarding vaccines.

I’m basically in the business of making people immunocompromised. And you’d better believe that I’ve seen how bad things get when immunocompromised people don’t get vaccinated, and get sick. I’ve recently - as in the last few months - had patients get CoVID, pertussis or influenza and end up in the hospital. So you’d better believe I encourage people to get vaccinated - and I’m up to date on vaccines myself. And I’m surprised as hell that so many doctors don’t think this is necessary, and don’t care to promote it to patients.

It’s disappointing, really. Depressing also.
I'm tired of patients lecturing me on vaccines. I'm tired of my satisfaction scores taking big hits when I bring up vaccines. I'm tired of being told I "just don't know the truth about vaccines".

I take every vaccine that I'm eligible for.

I refuse to see unvaccinated children.

My kids are fully vaccinated.

But I just don't care what my adult patients do about getting vaccinated anymore. If they ask, I tell them what they're due for and that I encourage every vaccine that we have. Otherwise I leave it alone.
 
I don't disagree, amigo - it's the "government overreach" that bothers me in particular.

But I just don't care what my adult patients do about getting vaccinated anymore. If they ask, I tell them what they're due for and that I encourage every vaccine that we have.

It is still quite amazing the cultural difference between the U.S. and many other parts of the world.

You could probably say N.Z. had some of the "most egregious" "government overreach", and basically blackmailed the eligible adult population into getting vaccinated. But, differing potentially from the U.S., N.Z. had just about the lowest ICU bed capacity per capita of anywhere. If COVID were to run rampant through an unvaccinated population, it would have been dire healthcare rationing. It mattered to each of us whether another adult were vaccinated – the comorbid population 40-50+ at risk for hospitalization and/or critical care would have saturated hospitals to the point there wouldn't have been capacity to care for any other presentations. There was definitely a "we're all in this together and we have to do it for each other – and their parents/grandparents" cultural spirit going on. This was also in the timeframe in which primarily O.G. SARS-CoV-2 and Delta were circulating, when vaccines were actually 90-95%+ successful at blocking infection, and thus onward transmission.

There were definitely a number of folks who protested and saw it as an invasion of personal liberty, and that did have the effect of breaking down some social cohesion – but NZ came out of the pandemic with *fewer* expected deaths, rather than more. It's a worthy subject for re-examination to help inform how a future pandemic might be addressed.

We're also a great case study in showing how the shots didn't kill thousands of people as absurdly claimed. The vast majority of the population here had at least 3 mRNA shots and vaccine-related adverse effects were aggressively tracked:
 
Why can't we debate vaccines? Some have efficacy and benefit (polio), while others are either unnecessary or harmful. The big payday for pharma companies is to get a vaccine on the childhood vaccination schedule which guarantees a stream of pure profit indefinitely. That's why childhood vaccines have gone from a handful, to 30+ in the last 40 years. I can point to the Hepatitis B vaccine as a glaring example. Not something we should be given to infants. We should limit vaccines in the developing immune system to the bare minimum that are necessary for young childhood.
Vaccines have a market because the diseases they prevent or significantly reduce in severity sicken, maim, and kill a large enough percentage of the population that people took the time and money to create, test, and manufacture them in large doses. Can you point out the science behind not giving Hep B vaccines to infants? Can you defend your last sentence as anything other than an unscientific appeal to pathos?
 
I don't disagree, amigo - it's the "government overreach" that bothers me in particular.

COVID had a 99%+ recovery rate.
I'm fit, young, and healthy.
Seemed unnecessary for me.
Maybe I'd get it anyways.
Wife was very underwhelmed by what her people back at Merck were saying about the data.

But facing being fired for opting out?
That's not okay.
Why are you whitewashing COVID? Did you get to ride it out in some magical land where you weren't intubating 2-3x often and having coworkers develop short and long term disabilities or die? This amnesia for how bad things were and combined with the fact that your hated "government overreach" was almost exclusively private companies dictating their employees behavior is a bizarre response to a series of deeply traumatic events.
 
Why are you whitewashing COVID? Did you get to ride it out in some magical land where you weren't intubating 2-3x often and having coworkers develop short and long term disabilities or die? This amnesia for how bad things were and combined with the fact that your hated "government overreach" was almost exclusively private companies dictating their employees behavior is a bizarre response to a series of deeply traumatic events.

I definitely saw young people die like crazy in 2020, and the delta variant was also an asskicker

It does seem to just be a cold virus now though

we beat it into submission by constantly giving it to ourselves

'murica
 
Why are you whitewashing COVID? Did you get to ride it out in some magical land where you weren't intubating 2-3x often and having coworkers develop short and long term disabilities or die? This amnesia for how bad things were and combined with the fact that your hated "government overreach" was almost exclusively private companies dictating their employees behavior is a bizarre response to a series of deeply traumatic events.

I'm sorry that was your experience.
It wasn't mine.
Numbers are numbers, however - and the virus had a 99%+ recovery rate.
 
Why are you whitewashing COVID? Did you get to ride it out in some magical land where you weren't intubating 2-3x often and having coworkers develop short and long term disabilities or die? This amnesia for how bad things were and combined with the fact that your hated "government overreach" was almost exclusively private companies dictating their employees behavior is a bizarre response to a series of deeply traumatic events.

Government is government, be it federal, state, local, or the "governance" of a private company.

I had a government job at the time as well.
 
The assertion that we do not critically evaluate vaccines belies ignorance. There are many infectious diseases for which we have vaccines that are not recommended for lower risk individuals. HPV is not recommended after a certain age, rabies/typhoid/yellow fever are not recommended UNLESS you're doing something high-risk. Should doctors and medical societies be circumspect of pharmaceutical manufacturer's claims and base their recommendations on a robust risk-benefit analysis? Yes. Good news: we are and they do!
 
I'm sorry that was your experience.
It wasn't mine.
Numbers are numbers, however - and the virus had a 99%+ recovery rate.
“Numbers are numbers”

There were >100M cases reported in the US with a mortality of ~1,200,000, which is almost the entire population of Dallas, TX.

The economic cost of Covid-19 has been estimated at 15 trillion dollars.

Cumulative excess deaths attributed to Covid-19 exceed 25M globally.

The mortality rates for unvaccinated vs vaccinated patients were demonstrably different.

Why are we denying that a worldwide epidemic occurred 5 years ago?

united-states-rates-of-covid-19-deaths-by-vaccination-status.png
vaccination-lives-saved.png
 
I'm sorry that was your experience.
It wasn't mine.
Numbers are numbers, however - and the virus had a 99%+ recovery rate.
I have to ask: did your hospital not get overwhelmed with COVID at least once? Mine was significantly over capacity twice that I can recall (Fall 2020 and Delta in August/September 2021). We're talking 90% of beds full of COVID.

Part that really pissed me off is during Delta less than 10% of those hospitalized were vaccinated and less than 2% in the ICU.
 
I have to ask: did your hospital not get overwhelmed with COVID at least once? Mine was significantly over capacity twice that I can recall (Fall 2020 and Delta in August/September 2021). We're talking 90% of beds full of COVID.

Part that really pissed me off is during Delta less than 10% of those hospitalized were vaccinated and less than 2% in the ICU.

It did.
And there were far more cases of people who stayed home with it and got better easy (like me).
 
Top