- Joined
- Mar 12, 2007
- Messages
- 1,356
- Reaction score
- 16
Well, it's not like I expected it to be this tremendous intellectual journey. I knew going in there would be a lot of rote memorization.
Nevertheless, I have to say I never imagined MSI to be quite THIS dry and odious. I thought Gross Anatomy was bad. Now that we're done with that block and into some other blocks, I'm reminiscing about the good old days of anatomy.
I mean, despite all the hype beforehand (and angst during), I actually kind of enjoyed head & neck (extremities was a total nightmare). Now on to the hard science stuff... right? Except there's barely any thinking involved. The material is dull as ____.
The ONLY class I'm maybe looking forward to is physiology.... and I won't get to take that until a long long time later.
Another thing I did not anticipate before starting med school was how BIG of a difference a systems-based approach vs regional-based approach would make in terms of my personal learning and level of satisfaction. Our anatomy was region based and that made things endlessly and needlessly confusing/complicated. I think if our curriculum were organized by system, I would get so much more out of it. I'm such a relationships kind of learner, and everything about the way I'm being taught is contrary to the way I learn.
I know some of you are going to wonder how clinically relevant our curriculum has (with the thought that more clinical correlations = more interest). And the odd thing about that (quite reasonable) thought is... we actually have a fair amount of clinical stuff embedded into our curriculum. The problem with that is, it goes totally over my head. I mean, with the amount of knowledge that I have, I don't feel that I'm able to appreciate the material being presented at this point in time. (It's more of a "show and tell" kind of thing, rather than something we're supposed to actually take in fully.) Consequently, I just feel like speculating on those clinical cases is a pure waste of time. I end up frustrated and wishing I could be spending the time studying stuff I'm actually really expected to master at the present time. (I know I'm in the minority on this point though... as many of my classmates appear to enjoy speculating and putting their 2 cents in on these cases, despite lacking any of the necessary background knowledge to give educated guesses... lol)
Just wondering if anyone can relate, I guess. I honestly don't mean to sound whiny. Again, I know med school is supposed to be about memorization, supposed to have lots of dry info, etc.
...I guess I just did not expect things to be quite THIS miserable. What makes it worse is that others appear to be ENJOYING this crap.
And the question that follows is of course... when does it get better? Does it get better? Is it a matter of my curriculum or my learning style? Can I adjust my style? (I guess I have to.)
Nevertheless, I have to say I never imagined MSI to be quite THIS dry and odious. I thought Gross Anatomy was bad. Now that we're done with that block and into some other blocks, I'm reminiscing about the good old days of anatomy.

I mean, despite all the hype beforehand (and angst during), I actually kind of enjoyed head & neck (extremities was a total nightmare). Now on to the hard science stuff... right? Except there's barely any thinking involved. The material is dull as ____.
The ONLY class I'm maybe looking forward to is physiology.... and I won't get to take that until a long long time later.
Another thing I did not anticipate before starting med school was how BIG of a difference a systems-based approach vs regional-based approach would make in terms of my personal learning and level of satisfaction. Our anatomy was region based and that made things endlessly and needlessly confusing/complicated. I think if our curriculum were organized by system, I would get so much more out of it. I'm such a relationships kind of learner, and everything about the way I'm being taught is contrary to the way I learn.
I know some of you are going to wonder how clinically relevant our curriculum has (with the thought that more clinical correlations = more interest). And the odd thing about that (quite reasonable) thought is... we actually have a fair amount of clinical stuff embedded into our curriculum. The problem with that is, it goes totally over my head. I mean, with the amount of knowledge that I have, I don't feel that I'm able to appreciate the material being presented at this point in time. (It's more of a "show and tell" kind of thing, rather than something we're supposed to actually take in fully.) Consequently, I just feel like speculating on those clinical cases is a pure waste of time. I end up frustrated and wishing I could be spending the time studying stuff I'm actually really expected to master at the present time. (I know I'm in the minority on this point though... as many of my classmates appear to enjoy speculating and putting their 2 cents in on these cases, despite lacking any of the necessary background knowledge to give educated guesses... lol)
Just wondering if anyone can relate, I guess. I honestly don't mean to sound whiny. Again, I know med school is supposed to be about memorization, supposed to have lots of dry info, etc.
...I guess I just did not expect things to be quite THIS miserable. What makes it worse is that others appear to be ENJOYING this crap.
And the question that follows is of course... when does it get better? Does it get better? Is it a matter of my curriculum or my learning style? Can I adjust my style? (I guess I have to.)
Last edited: