- Joined
- Dec 11, 2007
- Messages
- 588
- Reaction score
- 75
See: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/19/us/19scotus.html
Medical summary: PA attempts to give Phenergan as an IV push, but injects into an artery. Pt loses her arm, sues, and wins.
Legal question: Since the drug manufacture warns of the intra-arterial risk and their warnings and drugs are FDA approved, should the pt be able to sue? Should FDA approval be an approval of risk-benefit, or a minimum standard?
What do you guys think?
I think, given what the FDA process is today, it should be considered a minimum and people should be able to sue.
Medical summary: PA attempts to give Phenergan as an IV push, but injects into an artery. Pt loses her arm, sues, and wins.
Legal question: Since the drug manufacture warns of the intra-arterial risk and their warnings and drugs are FDA approved, should the pt be able to sue? Should FDA approval be an approval of risk-benefit, or a minimum standard?
What do you guys think?
I think, given what the FDA process is today, it should be considered a minimum and people should be able to sue.