Medical School & Drop outs / failures

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

phar

The Pacifist
7+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
20+ Year Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2003
Messages
891
Reaction score
3
I was just wondering how many medical students are kicked out for bad grades or character? What happens to such individuals?In medical school do you have to maintain a certain grade or "gpa-like". It seems like medical schools don't report such information to avoid embrassment.

thx.

Members don't see this ad.
 
I think in must schools, once you pass all your classes, you will be fine. Even if you fail, you get another chance by repeating the entire year.
 
It's pretty rare for someone to fail out of med school. Schools really want all their students to make it through, and let you repeat classes if you need to. When people do drop out, it's usually for personal reasons, not academic ones.
 
Members don't see this ad :)
In my school, if you fail one course you can take the shelf exam in the summer, and be advanced to the next year if you pass the exam. I think if you fail more than one course, you need to repeat the year.
 
though most schools advertise their grading as Pass/Fail or Honors/Pass/Fail, the reality is that it is "Pass Now"/"Pass Later". It is EXTREMELY difficult to fail out of med school. As another poster mentioned, it's usually not a result of bad grades but personal/personality issues or just change in career plans.

my school had faculty and co-students try to tutor/help out another student if it looked like they were in academic jeopardy.

the one person i know in med school that did not graduate with me was dismissed for committing a felony. In exchange for the school not pressing charges, he was asked not to leave. he would not receive any endorsements for any new school, so he basically had to decide on a new career choice. i don't know what happened to him after that.

it's to a school's advantage to ensure that they are retaining and promoting their students appropriately. these stats get looked at by accrediting bodies such as the LCME, and if not up to par, can result in revocation of accreditation. so you can't fail unless you want to.
 
no one has been kicked out for poor academic performance here. one guy took a leave of absence when he was doing poorly then started up again this fall and is now doing fine as a member of the class of 2006. Two other girls failed physiology twice, once during the regular semester and once during the summer, and they were held back but not dismissed. BTW, would like to dispel the notion that your undergrad school correlates with whether or not you will pass or fail. The three former members of my class who were held back graduated from Tulane, Columbia, and MIT.
 
Thanks for the responses.........After reading the posts, i seem to have more respect for my undergraduate institution where "higher learning" is preserved meaning they will kick out any student who does not maintain a certain academic grades which collerates to success.....Since medical schools seem to have these retention program aimed at pretty much graduating any dumb students that might have lurked into their program, CREATES PROBLEMS in our healthcare community vis-a-vis society. Yes, some college students have such similar retention programs but here we are talking about healthcare and not some undergraduate theater major.

I THINK these are the students that cost malpractice insurance rates to go up, bring embrassment to the medical community(e.g. duke) and others. Why should a "dumb" doctor serve society?

Have medical schools ever being protested for having such retention programs?

I am not yet in medical school but how do you percieve of your class that has such students? Does it bring shame to the class or is pretty much ignored by and the administration.

Don't get wrong, i am not insulting anyone... I just don't think patient should be left in the hands of any "dumb" doctor. Saving lifes comes before saving school's reputation. Right?

Let's say for every medical school class, at least 2% of the class are failures(academics) and that will certain add up at the end.. Hence, we might have a "flood of dumb doctors" and more appreciations for voodoo medicines.
 
While you have to learn the stuff they present to you in the first two years (well, some of it, anyway), I think that future success/failure as a physician correlates more with your clinical work during medical school (third and fourth year) and your training in residency. So, I really don't think that people who fail anatomy or phsyiology are necessarily going to be worse doctors than people who sailed through with honors.

Remember, you have to pass the boards, so there is an overarching body, that the school has no control over, that ensures that everyone has some baseline amount of knowledge.
 
Originally posted by phar
Thanks for the responses.........After reading the posts

After reading the posts you came to this concluesion. lol. I love the posts where people post something pretending not to have a preformed opinion and then jump on one side, showing that he really just posted so he could argue something. Reminds me of kreno and the "Race in patient history. Stupid???"

All that being said, I agree, to some extent. The doctors who normally get malpractice problems are in specialties that are very hard to get into (Surgery, etc.) So it isn't really a competancy at medical school that is the problem.
 
Originally posted by phar
Thanks for the responses.........After reading the posts, i seem to have more respect for my undergraduate institution where "higher learning" is preserved meaning they will kick out any student who does not maintain a certain academic grades which collerates to success.....Since medical schools seem to have these retention program aimed at pretty much graduating any dumb students that might have lurked into their program

None of my classmates are anywhere close to what I would call dumb...why do you think they make it so hard to get in? Adcoms want to find those people who tend to work their butts off. Intelligence has nothing to do with the people who fail. Occasionally classes do get slackers...I know a few of those, but even the slackers (or the ones who claim they are) work harder than some honors people I knew in undergrad. And the slackers realize that they most likely aren't going to be surgeons, etc. Once you get to med school, you'll have a better appreciation for how hard people work "just" to pass.
 
Originally posted by phar
Thanks for the responses.........After reading the posts, i seem to have more respect for my undergraduate institution where "higher learning" is preserved meaning they will kick out any student who does not maintain a certain academic grades which collerates to success.....

I believe your interpretation is incorrect.

As opposed to medical school, there is plenty of opportunity at the undergraduate level to graduate, repeat courses, and complete a Bachelors degree. If a student fails a course in college, sure he gets a big zero calculated into his GPA, but at most colleges, students can retake that course for a grade. At my undergraduate institution, New York University, the policy was to retake the course and have the second grade counted in the GPA -- not the first -- but the first would remain on the transcript. Furthermore, most colleges institute policies which allow up to eight (8) academic years to complete the Bachelors degree.

In medical school, there is little opportunity to repeat courses and to advance once a student has failed something. As others have pointed out, some medical schools require repeating the ENTIRE academic year because of a failure. You won't find that in college. In addition, I believe all LCME-accredited medical schools have a maximum of six (6) academic years to complete the MD.

There was a time in medical education where some schools accepted huge classes, almost doubling what the average med school class size is today. The standards were high, but nothing compared to the competition faced today to get into medical school. The real competition didn't begin until one got to medical school. Some schools were known to cut half their classes within a year, another half in the second-year, to finally leave them with the few who would go on to graduate. This is similar to the pyramidal programs of old in General Surgery, before the development of the beloved categorical position. 🙂

To be honest, med schools vary in how likely they are to ruin a student's career after failing. Take for example:

At one school, School A, failing a course means re-taking the final examination at the end of the academic year -- when you've forgotten everything. Failing the re-take exam requires repeating the entire academic year. Failing more than two final exams means repeating the academic year, without a chance to re-take the exams in the summer. All grades are recorded onto the transcript, as in fail then pass.

At another, School B, failing a course also means re-taking the final examination at the next suitable break period, e.g., spring break, winter break, a long weekend, etc. (which the student chooses, according to his own preferences). Failing the re-take exam requires the scheduling of a tutorial session with the course director that can be scheduled whenever the student has time, e.g., right at the beginning of the third-year or during the summer vacation period between first and second-years. This student does NOT repeat the academic year. What's even more obscene is that if the student had passed the re-take only the pass grade would be recorded onto the transcript, leaving out all mention of the failing grade.

Why is there such variation and nothing standard? I don't know. One would think the LCME has certain rules regarding this, and provided that were true, it may be up to the individual school to decide how "best" to handle a particular situation. One thing's for sure, the student who attends School B will have fewer questions regarding his academic performance than the kid who attended School A.

Wow. Methinks that was a tiny tangent.

Good luck.
 
Of the 5 dropouts that I know of so far, 2 of them prolly just never should have been admitted, and the other 3 all had personal problems at home or was really just in medicine b/
 
Members don't see this ad :)
I think it is awfully insensitive to assume that anyone who does poorly in a class is a dumb person, or will make a dumb/bad doctor. Everyone faces hardships, and we all have times when we don't do as well as we would like to. I tend to believe that the med student with more hardships could possibly make a more humble and sensitive physician than one who has had nothing but successes all of his/her life, and could quite possibly be stuck up. Like some others mentioned already, clinical training and the boards eventually even it out, especially since each med student will have to somehow learn the material in order to pass the class, even if it takes more than one try.
 
Hey I was failing anatomy (badly, we're talking less than 50% on first two tests) so dropped the course and extended my stay in medical school (did the 5 year plan). It was family and personal problems as well. Kind of ironic as to the specialty I'm now in (I did do extremely well my 2nd time around). I give people the benefit of the doubt on these things up to a point. At certain times in your life everyone will have family/friends that get very ill, die or have other life issues that are bound to distract you for a time.

It didn't happen to me, but at State, they'd automatically dismiss you if you failed 8 credits (I believe it was 8) in your first year or 12 credits withing the first 2 years, or failed 2 clinical rotations in years 3 and 4. You just get the letter in the mail and are no longer a student. You have to appeal the decision and most of the time they let most people back in but sometimes people never get back in or if you mess up twice there is almost no chance of getting another chance.
 
I think one of my main points has been barely touched....Do you personally want to work in a profession where you are aware that some of your collegues can be classified as a 'step forward' which could adversely affect the prospect of your own future/work environment. Indeed, it is part of our current medical community(classic example, malpractice insurance rates).
 
Originally posted by phar
I think one of my main points has been barely touched....Do you personally want to work in a profession where you are aware that some of your collegues can be classified as a 'step forward' which could adversely affect the prospect of your own future/work environment. Indeed, it is part of our current medical community(classic example, malpractice insurance rates).

By that logic, we should have some arbitrary class rank below which you are not allowed to graduate. I have "barely passed" a few classes. That is, I got a 70 or 71 where somebody who failed might have gotten a 68 or 69. That might be a one question difference and could be explained by a bad chicken burrito on the eve of the exam.

I think the faculty is best qualified to determine who will advance and who will be dropped. Besided, Step 1 is the great leveler. If you pass that I guess you can safely say that you have a handle on the pre-clinical material.

This is the first and only time you will ever hear me say this, but there are people who are smart "on paper" who can't find their ass with two hands and a flashlight.

Also, some of us have wives, kids, and lives so we might not be able to study seven hours a day to be in the top ten percent of the class. More power to you if you are, by the way.
 
Phar,

I think perhaps the reason your question was not directly answered is because you are a bit misguided in your thinking. What I think you will find is that getting good grades in medical school and becoming a good physician don't require the same skills. A good student does well on exams. A good physician nails the diagnoses.

Doing well on exams requires someone to be an efficient studier.

Nailing a diagnosis requires the ability to take a good history, perform a good physical, and follow-up with the proper diagnostic exams which requires interpersonal skills, physical examination skills, and a fund of knowledge.

Knowing the symptoms of a disease is only useful if you can actually recognize the symptoms when you see them (that is a skill that you are never tested on).

To be honest, when you get on the wards you often forget which symptoms and clinical features go with which diseases and you have to look them up (i.e., 5-minute clinical consult, Harrison's, etc.). After looking them up a few times they become easier to remember. Hence, every physician has some fund of knowledge deficit and most overcome them by looking things up.

It is a lot harder and sometimes impossible to look up how to recognize a symptom or physical finding (i.e., rales, murmurs, jaudice) and taking a proper history is a skill unto itself. You can't really look up how to take a proper history, and if you are doing it wrong you often don't know until someone tells you that you missed something.

Having a deficiency in your fund of knowledge (textbook) isn't as crippling as you would think. However, having a deficiency in your ability to perform clinical tasks can be a huge detriment. The boards tend to weed out those with an extreme deficit in fund of knowledge as they exist today. They don't catch those with clinical deficits. THIS IS WHY THEY ARE ADDING A HISOTRY AND PHYSICAL EXAM PORTION TO THE USMLE step 2 EFFECTIVE 2005!!!

So, to answer your question. The idea of my career being affected by my colleages competence is a concern to me, but that concern has less to do with academics than it does with clinical competence.

Also, for the record, malpractice is MUCH more influenced by location than by competence.
 
I think there definitely are some people who are just in this for the money or prestige. I know from personal experience, because one of my classmates seems to be one of those people. Her personal statement said something about how once she saw a hospital commercial with some doctors in it and thought to herself, "hey I can do that." I've sat next to her in lecture and she laughs at pictures we are shown in class. She is also not the brightest person and doesn't work very hard. She did horribly on the mcat and has already failed one class. Honestly she only got in because she's a URM. She will probably not make a good doctor because she doesn't have the right motivation in addition to being "dumb". I think there are definitely people out there who are not flat out geniuses when it comes to standardized exams and that sort of thing, but they are people who work hard and have the right motivation. And that is just as or even more important to being a good doc than plain intelligence. The admissions process is not perfect, and just like in any profession people will slip through the cracks. But I still think the process is extremely good and the majority of docs out there are competent.
 
Phar: You say that you are not yet in medical school, that itself goes a long way in explaining your position. When you are in medical school you will see that just to pass the classes you have to know a large amount of the information. It's not the same as undergrad at all, at least in my experience. Remember most med schools these days are pass/fail.

The people that I worry about the most are those that do really well in their classes because they can memorize and regurgitate but don't have any analytical thinking skills.
 
I apologize for watering this thread. It seems like there a couple of threads regarding Fs/failings....... So, i feel like the discussion on this thread is the key point in most malpractice cases. If you fail one class, you ought to be kicked out.!!!!!!!!!!!!

I think most of you are Underestimating the value of A patient's life. I personally have no remorse for any medical student flunking a class. THERE IS NO EXCUSE!!! All doctors feel superior(+pissed+ ) as they can kill a person(whether direct or indirect) and get away with higher insurance payments. Those stupid medical schools offering summer classes for failures after money and nothing else.


READ MY LIPS.
People who a 'miss a step'(like fail or take time off from school) in the doctor path for EXTREME family/personal HEALTH problems(no stupid headache or stomache) *maybe* forgiven and allowed to continue the doctor path.


It is shame that most of you on this thread seem to be giving excuses and covering up the "big hole" in humanity. Humanity says that there is no excuse for killing another being. Humanity says that if you are not competent enough to become a doctor then go do something else.


The question is how can competency be determined?

1)I can guarantee that flunking is NOT part of "competency".


2)All students who finish medical school and pass all the boards. THERE SHOULD be a competency exam whereby students are judged on their psychological well being and other things. I know some schools have similar kind of things but they are not as effective.

My point..........YOU FLUNK......you should be kicked out or kick yourself out.......Which is worth? an MD diploma or the life of a human being. You decide (obvious answer).
 
Originally posted by phar
I apologize for watering this thread. It seems like there a couple of threads regarding Fs/failings....... So, i feel like the discussion on this thread is the key point in most malpractice cases. If you fail one class, you ought to be kicked out.!!!!!!!!!!!!

I think most of you are Underestimating the value of A patient's life. I personally have no remorse for any medical student flunking a class. THERE IS NO EXCUSE!!! All doctors feel superior(+pissed+ ) as they can kill a person(whether direct or indirect) and get away with higher insurance payments. Those stupid medical schools offering summer classes for failures after money and nothing else.


READ MY LIPS.
People who a 'miss a step'(like fail or take time off from school) in the doctor path for EXTREME family/personal HEALTH problems(no stupid headache or stomache) *maybe* forgiven and allowed to continue the doctor path.


It is shame that most of you on this thread seem to be giving excuses and covering up the "big hole" in humanity. Humanity says that there is no excuse for killing another being. Humanity says that if you are not competent enough to become a doctor then go do something else.


The question is how can competency be determined?

1)I can guarantee that flunking is NOT part of "competency".


2)All students who finish medical school and pass all the boards. THERE SHOULD be a competency exam whereby students are judged on their psychological well being and other things. I know some schools have similar kind of things but they are not as effective.

My point..........YOU FLUNK......you should be kicked out or kick yourself out.......Which is worth? an MD diploma or the life of a human being. You decide (obvious answer).

Remember phar that you are a human being not a robot. How does flunking one class equate to all your life's hard work to achieve your goal of being a doctor relinquished. Thank goodness people like Albert Einstein, Benjamin Carson, and many people that were faced with failures didn't think like you or else they would have never made breakthroughs through thier failures.
 
Originally posted by phar
My point..........YOU FLUNK......you should be kicked out or kick yourself out.......Which is worth? an MD diploma or the life of a human being.
Hmm...you don't strike me as the sharpest tool in the shed yourself. Maybe you ought to be certain your own glass house isn't going to shatter with all the stones you're casting. Why don't you check back in a year and you can let us know then what your opinion is of students who find medical school to be challenging.
 
I am a big fan of a couple of strikes rule. Its ok if you fail a class, but you should have to pass it somehow, and every school has some method of ensuring you pass the exam. If you fail a second time, in any other class, then i can see letting somebody go. However, i can see rehabilitating there too. im 50/50 on it. Three fails, unquestionably somebody should be gone...at that point they are a liability, regardless of circumstances.
And Phar, perhaps more malpractice/stupid dr. decisions are made by poor performing students, but I havent seen any data on it. Its my own hunch from my own experiences, that more mistakes are made by poor communication, poor follow-up, and laziness than are made due to stupidity.
 
I am not ginxing you phar but I hope that you don't let your dreams come true because of one failing grade. Makes me wonder...🙄
 
Originally posted by jjackis
I am a big fan of a couple of strikes rule. Its ok if you fail a class, but you should have to pass it somehow, and every school has some method of ensuring you pass the exam. If you fail a second time, in any other class, then i can see letting somebody go. However, i can see rehabilitating there too. Three fails, unquestionably somebody should be gone...at that point they are a liability, regardless of circumstances.
And Phar, perhaps more malpractice/stupid dr. decisions are made by poor performing students, but I havent seen any data on it. Its my own hunch from my own experiences, that many mistakes are made by poor communication, poor follow-up, and laziness than are made due to stupidity.

I bet those doctors that made the decision about the little girl that died at Duke were the top of their class. I do agree with you jjackis
 
I doubt the doctors at Duke that almost killed me a few years ago had EVER flunked a class.🙄
 
Phar-
After reading your posts in this thread I can tell you that I wouldn't want you as my physician. People heal, change, overcome difficulty, and do great things in spite of prior mistakes. Sometimes those mistakes are the teaching instruments that make people great at what they do. Before you start working with patients, you might want to ease up on the judgement and stop seeing the world in black and white.
 
It is not like college, where you fail a class and you can make it up with AP credit or take another, perhaps easier class, to make up the credits.

You have to pass the same class with the same material (either over the summer or the following year), so you do end up proving that you learned the same material as everyone else. In fact, I know one person who failed a class and had to retake it...this individual probably knows the material better than many who passed the first time because s/he went through the material twice.

Also, one class is just a single step on the long ladder to becoming a doctor. It may disturb your world-view, but one class is hardly significant in the grand scheme of what one needs to do to earn and MD/DO and ultimately become a practicing physician.

Finally, I am not at all worried about someone who fails a preclinical class. A good chunk of that stuff most people forget anyway because it has no bearing on medical practice. I don't care if my doctor can't remember all the steps of glycolysis or the function of IL-12, as long as s/he can treat me.
 
Okay...I feel like I need to put in my $0.02

As an incoming M1, I have some issues with the points made by the OP.

First, I take issue with the rationale that someone who failed a course will be a "dumb" doctor. There are a lot of mitigating circumstances that can lead a student to do poorly in a course. Medical school takes a lot of adjustment, and sometimes students don't adjust well. As a previous poster mentioned about barely passing, where the difference between passing and failing could have been one question. What can be said about those at the borderline - those who barely pass? Will they become "dumb" doctors? Or, are they borderline "dumb"? I don't think so.

Second, the simple fact is that this shouldn't be about pass/fail in the preclinical years, but whether or not you learn the material. You have the USMLE to help ensure that everyone is learning the material that they should. So, the student who failed gross or biochem may have failed the first time had to work to master the material in order to pass. Sometimes you need the lightbulb to turn on before the material becomes clear.

Third, a comment was made about schools that offer a summer course are only after money. Has anyone thought about the fact that medical schools put a tremendous amount of investment on the students who attend their school? By offering an opportunity to repeat a course, it allows for a potential return on that investment, rather than a loss.

Fourth, I resent the OP's argument that of the intersection between malpractice and humanity and its relation to grades. To say that bad grades are a function of a physician's ability and competence isn't valid. We've seen this in a number of disciplines, and some of the greatest minds in this world did not necessarily do well academically. To argue that physicians who weren't academically stellar violate the tenets of humanity by paying higher malpractice premiums in order to cover up their incompetence or negligence makes absolutely no sense! There are plenty of physicians who have been accused and are guilty of malpractice who passed all of their coursework in medical school...what does that make them?

In closing, I think we all agree that being a physician is more than just academics. Some of us may have to work harder to achieve that goal than others. I dare not call these folks "dumb" physicians.

Again, just my $0.02 - I feel much better now!

-Tomi
 
Phar--I will say this. If you want to completely eliminate poor performing students--if you think it is that detrimental to health care, then 1 strike/youre gone is the way to go. You will be throwing out some good future physicians along with it, but if your goal is to "screen" for those truly not mentally equipped for the job, then your proposal is reasonable. However, like i said before, most students who arent mentally equipped will fail again, thats why i like a couple of strikes. And also, everyone has a bad semester for some reason---it would not have been difficult for me to fail a class with a few more outside circumstances, im sure.
 
Third, a comment was made about schools that offer a summer course are only after money. Has anyone thought about the fact that medical schools put a tremendous amount of investment on the students who attend their school? By offering an opportunity to repeat a course, it allows for a potential return on that investment, rather than a loss.

Damn skippy. Most medical schools will lose money educating on a per student basis. While you are making an investment in your education, the school is making just as big an investment in you.

I'm not in favor of one-strike and you're out. The material will weed you out if you can't handle it.
 
Speaking as one who HAS failed one class, get a grip, Phar.

Sure, I could have studied more - but my husband and daughter (and dog and 2 cats) also required time, as did the new commute I had to do because the school district near my school SUCKS. Plus, given the situation in my life when I failed, I doubt it would've made much of a difference.

ANd if failing a class because I was distracted for the month and a half when I wasnt sure if my Mom would live to see Christmas (diagnosed with breast cancer, staging took FOREVER), makes me a "dumb" medical student who doesnt deserve to be a doctor, you need a serious reality check.

Luckily for me, I can remediate the class before 3rd year starts. WHILE Im studying for and taking the USMLE step 1.

Stuff happens. LIfe continues, even with medical school, and we all have to deal with it. I certaintly hope that if a family member close to you was in a similar situation that you would care more about your family than your grade.

ANd if you are one of those who contends that if you do anything besides study you arent "Dedicated" enough to be a doctor, get out now. I guaruntee that you will be an outspoken minority with very few friends.

Star
 
I think I have stated my case and it would be senseless to continue arguing. I have yet to see a current medical student who fully supports my argument (humanity should never be misled by poor judgment). However, I do plan to change the books of my medical school (If I find such incredible detours). Needless to say, I have never heard of upstate producing bad apples.

I wish you guys the best of luck. Should you have any mishaps in your academics and/or competency, I sincerely would like you to rewrite your dream. You may take an unnoticeable detour route to achieve your dream but the probability of you being associated with murder by ?humanity? is high. Do your math and make a good judgment.


Phar.


Feel +pity+ for humanity.
 
Originally posted by phar
the probability of you being associated with murder by ?humanity? is high.
Go back and take some basic courses in logic, einstein.
 
Phar,

I respect you opinion, however, without actually being a medical student your credibility is zero. The doctors enduring the most malpractice suits are more often the ones without patient rapport and great listening skills (this has been published). This doesn't correlate with how well these physicians did on M1-M2 exams. Frequently, physicians with no people skills are the gunner types that just cared about how well they did on exams without ever mastering the patient interview and understanding the humanism that accompanies the medical sciences. Recognize that you need to have a great knowledge base along with an attentive and compassionate bedside manner, and that failing a class in medical school can easily be done as there are usually only one or two exams with decide your grade. Everyone has a bad experience with an exam and exams don't always reflect what you actually understand and know (You memorize hundreds of things and are often tested on a very small percentage of that material). Everybody faces challenges and a random failure doesn't reflect how well a student will be in the clinic. Lighten up your opinion a little and spend that energy on reading up on the causes of physician malpractice claims...and likely you will recognize the importance of compassion, rather than making mindless correlations about the malpractice crisis.

BTW I haven't failed a class, however, I have been to at least one medical school class and believe me it isn't undergrad. We all did well there to get to medical school, nobody is academically "dumb" in medical school.

Good luck to you and hope you have a successful first year.
 
Hmm...you don't strike me as the sharpest tool in the shed yourself. Maybe you ought to be certain your own glass house isn't going to shatter with all the stones you're casting. Why don't you check back in a year and you can let us know then what your opinion is of students who find medical school to be challenging.

Rock on, WS. I'm sure you have the academic laurels to pose a nonsense argument like Phar's if you wanted to. Nice to see a surgeon with the kind of humility we all should have.

One reason med schools don't want to lose students is because there are way fewer transfers between schools, unlike in undergrad. Thus it is very hard to compensate for lost seats. An entering student will pay a given sum of money in tuition over 4 years, but if he/she stops after 2, there's a loss of cash bec. there will usually not be anyone to come in and fill the spot.

If there were no USMLE, the number of fails would matter, and keeping people in school for money reasons would be evil. But since there is a "cut" above which EVERYONE must be to practice medicine in the US, the number of fails in med school is irrelevant. Whatever way a school wants to invest their time and effort to help someone make the cut is their business. Ultimately, it's between the student and the board exams - if you can't pass, you can't practice. Phar's world of humanity stays safe.
 
You're not in med school and therefore have no real idea what the experience of being a med student is like. Wait a year and then reconsider your remarks.
 
Originally posted by phar
[B If you fail one class, you ought to be kicked out.!!!!!!!!!!!!

I think most of you are Underestimating the value of A patient's life. I personally have no remorse for any medical student flunking a class. THERE IS NO EXCUSE!!! All doctors feel superior(+pissed+ ) as they can kill a person(whether direct or indirect) and get away with higher insurance payments.
READ MY LIPS.
People who a 'miss a step'(like fail or take time off from school) in the doctor path for EXTREME family/personal HEALTH problems(no stupid headache or stomache) *maybe* forgiven and allowed to continue the doctor path.
[/B]

Phar...how old are you? You sound like a complete jacka$$
1) Who are you to make judgements about people and what they should be allowed to do if they fail a class? YOU HAVE NEVER BEEN A MEDICAL STUDENT!!
Failing biochem is different from failing a rotation! and PS...to error is to be human....are you going to drop out of medicine "re-write your dream" if you misdiagnose someone when you begin
to actually practice?
2) EVERY SCHOOL can produce bad apples. I think that Upstate probably will in 2007 if you are able to graduate then....

Seriously, I am shocked that you are going to be entering the same profession as I will be in August, and I hope that you get your attitude in check before classes start or at least before you get on the wards.
GOOD LUCK.
 
No kidding.

Isn't this the same poster who wants to be a doc but doesn't want to touch blood or perform procedures?

Well, I have to admire his/her ability to come up with provocative stuff. My posts never go 2 and 3 pages.
 
Wow........nice to get pre-allo geeks in here................... as always. 🙄
 
Originally posted by phar
I apologize for watering this thread. It seems like there a couple of threads regarding Fs/failings....... So, i feel like the discussion on this thread is the key point in most malpractice cases. If you fail one class, you ought to be kicked out.!!!!!!!!!!!!

It is shame that most of you on this thread seem to be giving excuses and covering up the "big hole" in humanity. Humanity says that there is no excuse for killing another being. Humanity says that if you are not competent enough to become a doctor then go do something else.

My point..........YOU FLUNK......you should be kicked out or kick yourself out.......Which is worth? an MD diploma or the life of a human being. You decide (obvious answer).

Phar -
Take this for what you will.

Before you start medical school, you may want to glance over at the DSM-IV.
Splitting: Seeing things as all or nothing (all good or all bad). It eliminates ambiguity so that the person sees themselves or others in clearly demarcated categories of black and white.
This is a primitive defense mechanism.

I don't know what you are defensive about, however, it is understandable to have some anxiety before starting something large like medical school.

In general, there are many people who you will help treat in medical school who may not meet your criteria of "success". These kind of "black or white" opinions may be a barrier to your ability to care for your patients appropriately. Better to work on more advanced defense mechanisms or more experiences with the world in order to help your patients better in the future.

CycloneDub
P.S. If you are just pulling people's chains, at least you're keeping me from being totally bored...
 
I sincerely believe in the well being of a human being. Our current healthcare state has given doctors too much authority and leeway. Why should we have a malpractice insurance dispute rather then a true murder investigation? Isn?t my patient?s life supposed to be equal to my life? Why should I have the right to play ?judge?? Where is my patient?s voice? Why shouldn?t my patient enjoy his/her dignity of an equal and just life? Indeed, malpractice justice is a true evil practice by professional inmates (doctors). You CANNOT equate the value of life with the cost of getting a piece of Jennifer lopez?s ass ($$$$). I just spoke for ?humanity?.

Most of these patients who have been ?killed? or ?ruined? by idiotic doctor (who supposedly took a detour route in medical school) cannot speak for themselves.

Detour route: academic failure and/or competency failure.


Please, no more self-righteous responses because I am sick of them.
 
You keep posting the same thing over and over again, yet you have provided no evidence to back up your central thesis-- that malpractice occurs more frequently among physicians who have failed a class. I don't think this is a valid assumption, and I can think of a lot of evidence that says it's not.

First off, why do neurosurgeons, who have the highest board scores of any specialty and probably not one of whom has ever failed or even come close to failing a class, also pay the highest malpractice rates if the "flunkee" doctors are the cause of most malpractice? I could make a similar argument for cardiothorasic surgeons, as well. Do you think pathologists, psychiatrists, and internal medcine doctors pay some of the lowest malpractice rates because they are the most academically dominant students and there are low numbers of physicians who had failed classes during med school among them?

What about that Santillan <sp?> girl who got the wrong organs due to a clerical error? Do you think any of those Duke doctors had ever come close to failing a class?

A big chunk of malpractice ends up occurring due to clerical errors/misreading charts/leaving things in patients after surgery/having been working for 40 or 50 hours straight and not being able to focus, etc. This has NOTHING to do with academic performance in med school. I think your assumption about a correlation between having failed a class and having higher incidence of errors is just wrong, and you just keep offering it without any evidence or examples to support it.

Rather than whipping out self-righteous distractions about the sanctity of patient life (who disputes this?), offer some actual support for your thesis first. Also, your assumption about physcian authority being at its highest levels today is so far off the mark as to be comical. Why don't you go ask any surgeon or medical professional about physican authority in the 60s and 70s versus authority today and see what he/she has to say (realistically if the person was practicing in the 60s, he/she is he, but, I digress). Doctors in our "current healthcare state" have less authority than they have had at any point in the last fifty years.
 
You guys are arguing with someone who has no credibility. This guy isn't even in medical school yet. Has never taken a medical school exam. Has no clue how easily one can fail or come close to failing an exam in medical school. This dude is a joke, don't even waste your time.

I seriously doubt he is even going to medical school in the fall. The MCAT, if nothing else, tests baseline competency. Something phar obviously lacks.
 
Interesting. Pretty strong words coming from someone who hasn't enrolled yet. It's not even worth the effort to discuss this with him since he doesn't understand what it's like. The rest of you are wasting your time.
 
Doesn't really matter if i am in medical school or not. Just to clarify, i won't start medical school till august and that is not the point here. And, I don't care how hard medical school is.

I simply based my common sense ideas on your stupid posts and made a connection about the secrets of "malpractice insurance".


Anyway, i had enough of this thread.


good luck.
 
Originally posted by Slickness
Phar is hilarious. I always enjoy his posts. He is going to be going to medical school yet he has some crazy ideas about medicine that no one seems to agree with, and even when he writes there are always errors in his sentences. 😀

Hey.....slick...longtime no see. 😉 You raise good points!.



Honestly, i careless if someone disagrees with me. I don't kiss assses..........i always say what is on my mind at any time and any where......I don't give a sheit at all because i am not constricted by self doubt at all.......I speak my mind. ***I only respect the viewpoints of individuals who respect mine***

Academics is all about free thinking!!! And so is life(just a little advice)


My writing:.......i type so fast!!!!(not an expert on "blind" typing). SDN is all about informal english......as long as my point is understood....that's good enough for this website.

In the future, you might consider reading those medical journals(ethical related topics) because you will definitely find me. I am sure you will be able relate those future sayings of mine with my current ideologies.
 
Originally posted by Phar
Indeed, malpractice justice is a true evil practice by professional inmates (doctors). You CANNOT equate the value of life with the cost of getting a piece of Jennifer lopez?s ass ($$$$). I just spoke for ?humanity?.


For the sake of humanity, can someone explain what this means.
 
Originally posted by Penguin Poptart
For the sake of humanity, can someone explain what this means.
:laugh:
 
Top