Medicare dropping 64624 (genicular RFA)?

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

agolden1

Full Member
10+ Year Member
Joined
May 5, 2013
Messages
288
Reaction score
197
Billers at my office telling me we’re no longer getting reimbursed by Medicare for genicular RFA. They were one of our only payers who allowed for it. I hadn’t seen any chatter about this, and there’s not really a LCD to speak to this. Anyone experiencing anything different or a workaround?

Thanks
 
I'm in WA state, we have been getting reimbursed so far. last one I got paid for was end of May. the other claims are likely still processing. hope its just a hiccup in the claims pipeline for you guys
 
Diagnostic getting covered. Just RFA.
How can they justify paying for the test but not the treatment? I am sure if we ask cms they will just axe the diagnostic blocks then too.
 
Anecdotally have had the same experience. This month we moved all genicular RFA to cash pay.
Billers at my office telling me we’re no longer getting reimbursed by Medicare for genicular RFA. They were one of our only payers who allowed for it. I hadn’t seen any chatter about this, and there’s not really a LCD to speak to this. Anyone experiencing anything different or a workaround?

Thanks
Just to be clear, you guys are saying that regular Medicare isn’t paying for genicular RFA? (Not Medicare advantage?)
 
It is contractor dependent I am sure. Have t heard anything about novitas.
I feel like Novitas is the most chill of the Medicare regions but I don’t understand why people across the country can have the exact same insurance but different access to services
 
I feel like Novitas is the most chill of the Medicare regions but I don’t understand why people across the country can have the exact same insurance but different access to services
Yes, agreed. Novitas very chill, just like the people they represent.
 
On insurance face sheets, our office says they just say "Medicare or Medicare B." Nothing more than this. A few private insurers are covering locally still.

I am less certain of using 64640. We use it for doing genicular steroid injections for folks with severe pain who cannot get approval for RFA, but I'm not sure the revenue would cover the cost of RFA.

Not the biggest fan of doing these procedures, but we have a handful of folks this really seems to help with, so I do hate to see it go.
 
Only blocks are covered for me, so I don’t do them. I offer genicular RFA for $800 and that’s it.

Probably going to do a few SPRINT cases soon.
 
Only blocks are covered for me, so I don’t do them. I offer genicular RFA for $800 and that’s it.

Probably going to do a few SPRINT cases soon.
Is that for genicular mononeuropathy?
I have n=2, both moderately happy (they keep their device on, don’t want it removed and helps them greater than 50%)
 
Is that for genicular mononeuropathy?
I have n=2, both moderately happy (they keep their device on, don’t want it removed and helps them greater than 50%)
I guess yeah, but I do not believe post TKA pain is neuropathic personally, or at least I don’t feel comfortable naming the nerve. I just feel if you have a TKA and you’re miserable there has got to be something neuropathic there, and all things considered, PNS is safe for the most part.

I do worry about TKA pts and infxn risk though.
 
Haven't heard about it. I use the peripheral nerve block LCDs to get Medicare and most Medicare Advantage folks to authorize the genicular blocks and RFAs.

L33933 (LCD - Peripheral Nerve Blocks (L33933)) and L36850 (LCD - Peripheral Nerve Blocks (L36850))

The argument is this is a diagnostic block to verify the pain is coming from the knee joint and not the hip/back/etc.

From the LCDS:
L33933: "When selective peripheral nerve blockade is used diagnostically in those cases in which the clinical picture is unclear. "
L36850: "When selective peripheral nerve blockade is used diagnostically in those cases in which the clinical picture is unclear but this is only for diagnostic purposes and not long term treatment."

Both then say "In some cases, neurolysis may be appropriate to provide lasting relief."

The ICD10 though should be pain
M25.561 Pain in right knee
M25.562 Pain in left knee
M25.569 Pain in unspecified knee

It doesn't work every time as now some of the MedAdv plans fall back on commercial guidelines
 
Haven't heard about it. I use the peripheral nerve block LCDs to get Medicare and most Medicare Advantage folks to authorize the genicular blocks and RFAs.

L33933 (LCD - Peripheral Nerve Blocks (L33933)) and L36850 (LCD - Peripheral Nerve Blocks (L36850))

The argument is this is a diagnostic block to verify the pain is coming from the knee joint and not the hip/back/etc.

From the LCDS:
L33933: "When selective peripheral nerve blockade is used diagnostically in those cases in which the clinical picture is unclear. "
L36850: "When selective peripheral nerve blockade is used diagnostically in those cases in which the clinical picture is unclear but this is only for diagnostic purposes and not long term treatment."

Both then say "In some cases, neurolysis may be appropriate to provide lasting relief."

The ICD10 though should be pain
M25.561 Pain in right knee
M25.562 Pain in left knee
M25.569 Pain in unspecified knee

It doesn't work every time as now some of the MedAdv plans fall back on commercial guidelines
So essentially you’re sending out as 64640 instead of 64624 for ablation if sending out as other peripheral nerve?
 
So essentially you’re sending out as 64640 instead of 64624 for ablation if sending out as other peripheral nerve?
No, the LCDs explicitly cover 64624 in addition to 64640. I reserve 64640 for other non-named ablations like the shoulder/hip targets.

Facet joints, genicular, SI lateral branches, trigeminals, BVNA, and some of the sympathetic chains have defined codes for thermal RFA but everything else is fair game under 64640. So if you want to burn some middle cluneals, have at it.
 
you should confirm you are getting paid for 64640.

some insurances "cover" but then do not pay for those procedures.

particularly SI branches, or geniculars. because they are not generic nerve RFA.
 
Only blocks are covered for me, so I don’t do them. I offer genicular RFA for $800 and that’s it.

Probably going to do a few SPRINT cases soon.
Where are you planning on putting the leads? Also how many?
 
I haven't heard anything about Genicular not being covered. It should continue to be covered since there is not an LCD for it. I'll ask my billers too.

For those who say use the peripheral nerve code instead, you should know that can be considered fraud since there is specific code for this procedure.
 
you should confirm you are getting paid for 64640.

some insurances "cover" but then do not pay for those procedures.

particularly SI branches, or geniculars. because they are not generic nerve RFA.
Yes they say “no auth required” buuuuuut that doesn’t mean we will pay you. You just don’t need auth. For the lack of payment. Just go for it!
 
The allowable on this is $382.84 in Maine. They can *have* this procedure. I do it as a courtesy to referring docs only and see it as a loss leader. Meanwhile the vet wants $300 to xray my cat.
 
The allowable on this is $382.84 in Maine. They can *have* this procedure. I do it as a courtesy to referring docs only and see it as a loss leader. Meanwhile the vet wants $300 to xray my cat.
I started saying no to this procedure years ago… In addition to the minimal reimbursement… My results were just fair and inviting failed knees is too much when you already see failed backs
 
I started saying no to this procedure years ago… In addition to the minimal reimbursement… My results were just fair and inviting failed knees is too much when you already see failed backs

This. I quickly learned there’s nothing worse than being a dumping ground for orthopedics after failed TKA. Literally the worst patients. Not desperate for business, so I said no thanks to it years ago.
 
I just tell them it’s the only thing I can do for them, and give it a go. Only takes 10-15 minutes.

What's your lesion protocol? I do three 60s lesions at 80C at each site fanning the needle around the target zones. I've found ultrasound is a much kinder way to place the needles and do local, although I rough in with fluoro. Takes me too long for the crappy reimbursement, but I do get good results.
 
Fluoro guided, AP approach. I used to get a lot more fancy. Now I numb skin, put the RF needles in a few inches, and start numbing a tract down to the targets, then switch to lateral and put the tips about 2/3 of the way across the femur, injecting local as I go. Then I add a little more local, motor test, and burn for 90 seconds 80 degrees, pull them back a cm, and burn again.
 
Fluoro guided, AP approach. I used to get a lot more fancy. Now I numb skin, put the RF needles in a few inches, and start numbing a tract down to the targets, then switch to lateral and put the tips about 2/3 of the way across the femur, injecting local as I go. Then I add a little more local, motor test, and burn for 90 seconds 80 degrees, pull them back a cm, and burn again.
What are you looking for on the motor testing?
 
I don’t have any problem with motor testing geniculars. I am not really looking for anything but it doesn’t throw the MA off her routine and gives a little more time for the local to setup.

I didn’t motor test at the hospital. We had moderate sedation to help the local along. We also had different staff that could handle changes in protocol better.
 
Top