Speaking of Medicare, apparently they now allow only one 11750 (matricectomy) per toe per lifetime unless you appeal. That's like a forever-global. They also won't pay for another 11730 for 32 weeks on any particular toe without an appeal.
Speaking of Medicare, apparently they now allow only one 11750 (matricectomy) per toe per lifetime unless you appeal. That's like a forever-global. They also won't pay for another 11730 for 32 weeks on any particular toe without an appeal.
The reason I ask is - this whole thing is weird. They put out new guidance but the values weren't really lifetime. They required a substantial time period between procedures, proof of which toe, specific modifiers if you did it, and a different modifier if another doctor did it which is garbage because you'd never know.
The second it went in Medicare in my area denied 2 11750's done at the same time on every patient. The code text was bizarre. We appealed using the new Medicare modifier and they didn't pay.
I stupidly had my office drop some of the second procedures. My partner did not. He ultimately got paid for them from what I can tell.
I brought it up with an APMA rep at a conference. He told me he wanted to see it. Said the guidance was rescinded the second it was put in place and he didn't know why they'd be doing that. I sent it. He never responded.
I keep waiting for new info. So what have you seen?
Use this page to view details for the Local Coverage Article for Billing and Coding: Surgical Treatment of Nails.
www.cms.gov
Searched 'Medicare 11750' and got the link above. Confirms that's been in place since 6/2022.
Per the article:
CPT codes 11730 and 11732 for nail avulsion will be denied if billed for the same finger less than 4 months (16 weeks) or the same toe less than 8 months (32 weeks) following a previous avulsion.
CPT code 11750 for nail excision permanent removal will be denied if billed for the same finger or toe following a previous excision. This part's vague, but read as "lifetime"
A medically reasonable and necessary repeat avulsion or excision of the same nail within 32 weeks of a previous avulsion, or excision, of the same nail, will be considered upon redetermination. The medical record must support the service, for example, there is an ingrown nail of the opposite border or a new significant pathology on the same border recently treated.
Use this page to view details for the Local Coverage Article for Billing and Coding: Surgical Treatment of Nails.
www.cms.gov
Searched 'Medicare 11750' and got the link above. Confirms that's been in place since 6/2022.
Per the article:
CPT codes 11730 and 11732 for nail avulsion will be denied if billed for the same finger less than 4 months (16 weeks) or the same toe less than 8 months (32 weeks) following a previous avulsion.
CPT code 11750 for nail excision permanent removal will be denied if billed for the same finger or toe following a previous excision. This part's vague, but read as "lifetime"
A medically reasonable and necessary repeat avulsion or excision of the same nail within 32 weeks of a previous avulsion, or excision, of the same nail, will be considered upon redetermination. The medical record must support the service, for example, there is an ingrown nail of the opposite border or a new significant pathology on the same border recently treated.
If a patient has a matricectomy on a given toe from a provider, then has another ingrown toenail on the same toe years later but doesn’t recall which toe or doesn’t inform the new provider about it, then does the new provider get a denial? Sounds like it. 👎🏼
Use this page to view details for the Local Coverage Article for Billing and Coding: Surgical Treatment of Nails.
www.cms.gov
Searched 'Medicare 11750' and got the link above. Confirms that's been in place since 6/2022.
Per the article:
CPT codes 11730 and 11732 for nail avulsion will be denied if billed for the same finger less than 4 months (16 weeks) or the same toe less than 8 months (32 weeks) following a previous avulsion.
CPT code 11750 for nail excision permanent removal will be denied if billed for the same finger or toe following a previous excision. This part's vague, but read as "lifetime"
A medically reasonable and necessary repeat avulsion or excision of the same nail within 32 weeks of a previous avulsion, or excision, of the same nail, will be considered upon redetermination. The medical record must support the service, for example, there is an ingrown nail of the opposite border or a new significant pathology on the same border recently treated.
You need the medically necessary repeat -77 mod (or -76 as applicable) and decent documentation on these... this applies most in big groups, but it applies to any group. Probably smart to just get accustomed to applying it on all payers (not just MCR) and building it into EMRs.
I don't think we've had any denials or re-submits as yet. It will probably start any time now. Merry Chanukah 🙂
Use this page to view details for the Local Coverage Article for Billing and Coding: Surgical Treatment of Nails.
www.cms.gov
Searched 'Medicare 11750' and got the link above. Confirms that's been in place since 6/2022.
Per the article:
CPT codes 11730 and 11732 for nail avulsion will be denied if billed for the same finger less than 4 months (16 weeks) or the same toe less than 8 months (32 weeks) following a previous avulsion.
CPT code 11750 for nail excision permanent removal will be denied if billed for the same finger or toe following a previous excision. This part's vague, but read as "lifetime"
A medically reasonable and necessary repeat avulsion or excision of the same nail within 32 weeks of a previous avulsion, or excision, of the same nail, will be considered upon redetermination. The medical record must support the service, for example, there is an ingrown nail of the opposite border or a new significant pathology on the same border recently treated.
You need the medically necessary repeat -77 mod (or -76 as applicable) and decent documentation on these... this applies most in big groups, but it applies to any group. Probably smart to just get accustomed to applying it on all payers (not just MCR) and building it into EMRs.
I don't think we've had any denials or re-submits as yet. It will probably start any time now. Merry Chanukah 🙂
Medicare defines "facility" and "non-facility" physician fee schedules for each locality. So if you are private practice surgeon and go to your ASC - each physician will receive their technical component reimbursement. The facility however will receive ASC type reimbursement. Meanwhile, if the procedure is done at a hospital the facility will receive reimbursement on a different schedule still.
Interestingly, BCBS in my area is now reimbursing surgeries at a higher rate if they are done outpatient (I'll have to look at exact wording, might be ASC, might just require outpatient).
The above discussion I believe is only for certain MACs. Not applicable on my previous one, is on my new one.
Also this was discussed at ACFAS billing course this year....it's not all how to take a small wedge of bone when doing a weil and then place that in your lapidus site and bill a harvest of autograft.
Medicare defines "facility" and "non-facility" physician fee schedules for each locality. So if you are private practice surgeon and go to your ASC - each physician will receive their technical component reimbursement. The facility however will receive ASC type reimbursement. Meanwhile, if the procedure is done at a hospital the facility will receive reimbursement on a different schedule still.
Interestingly, BCBS in my area is now reimbursing surgeries at a higher rate if they are done outpatient (I'll have to look at exact wording, might be ASC, might just require outpatient).
Speaking of Medicare, apparently they now allow only one 11750 (matricectomy) per toe per lifetime unless you appeal. That's like a forever-global. They also won't pay for another 11730 for 32 weeks on any particular toe without an appeal.
That's just great. First nails then callus codes, now this.
The solution may just be offering a 28825 if recurrence is noted after 11750 😆
Honestly Medicare is so much BS. Audits and denials are just not worth it. Medicare currently accounts for 7% of my patients, trying to get that number below 5%.
The worst is when a medicare patient wants custom orthotics or any kinda DME.
"What do you mean I have to pay? I have Medicare and they pay everything! Just write a prescription and it will be covered."🙄
Interestingly, BCBS in my area is now reimbursing surgeries at a higher rate if they are done outpatient (I'll have to look at exact wording, might be ASC, might just require outpatient).