I just really don't see why I'm being so criticized when students talk about an illness they've witnessed all the time in their statements. Maybe my point hasn't been clear enough: this isn't for my statement, I don't mention this anywhere else except for an optional essay about extenuating circumstances. The topic of interviews has come up quite frequently; honestly talking about this stuff isn't a big deal to me. I asked my brother for permission to even write this essay in the first place. My first draft might've had vivid details, but it's long been cut down to a brief description of what happened. I'm really only including this to explain my poor performance during that year, and to back up my motivations in pursuing medicine that is already established in the required parts of the app. I'm starting to recognize now that my various justifications only open me up for more misinterpretation. Still thankful for the comments, but will no longer respond since the thread is no longer actually answering my questions.
I think you are conflating two separate issues, and we're trying to provide you insight on the committee groupthink process from our perspectives (faculty/decision-makers or administrators who observe). [
I know the OP isn't going to respond anymore, and that's fine... I hope the following questions provide a basis for proper self-reflection and correction so that the poster can understand how to improve the application.]
Two things that admissions committees want from applicants germane to this discussion:
1) Your distance traveled including obstacles and challenges overcome (or mostly overcome) and how you reflect on those challenges if those clearly have placed you at a disadvantage early on in your life.
2) Your capacity for empathy and resilience in the face of handling trauma or situations where no apparent solution will "fix" the problem, especially regarding highly sensitive topics, as a future health care provider/professional. Also known as reflecting on the "
kobayahi maru" to me.
How does your story fit into these buckets?
If you are double-dipping into both buckets, it will cause confusion in how one should assess your application and groupthink will likely go in the direction that disfavors you (there will always be faculty members who are cynical in one way or another regarding the two questions above).
The problem if you are trying to use the illness in bucket one is that it does not clearly tell me how you overcame this challenge, especially if it is one that has hindered you from a socioeconomic access standpoint.
If you are trying to use this illness for filing bucket two, it is a slippery slope to blur personal and non-personal observations if you are to maintain an element of professionalism.
I think we among the Expert Consultants could probably argue and debate in the context of an applicant case study, but the fact that we won't have a strong consensus will put your application lower in the "acceptable for offer" rating compared to others who have made a more clear distinction.