- Joined
- May 27, 2006
- Messages
- 98
- Reaction score
- 1
Interested in impressions regarding Michigans IMS style of teaching the core sciences vs. the standard separate course approach for biochem, histo, path, pharm, anat, physio, etc.
Mich has this IMS "Integrated Medical Systems" approach three years running now and says they copy this system from numerous medical schools.
A systems-based modular approach makes sense however I'm not convinced Michigan doesn't have the bugs worked out...only 3 years this curriculum has been managed this way there. I've heard both good and bad from Michigan students while at the interview this weekend.
Curious if others will share impressions regarding this, good, bad, negative, positive, all comments welcome...including if you think the standard separate courses approach works fine (or better.)
Thanks in advance,
CZ
Mich has this IMS "Integrated Medical Systems" approach three years running now and says they copy this system from numerous medical schools.
A systems-based modular approach makes sense however I'm not convinced Michigan doesn't have the bugs worked out...only 3 years this curriculum has been managed this way there. I've heard both good and bad from Michigan students while at the interview this weekend.
Curious if others will share impressions regarding this, good, bad, negative, positive, all comments welcome...including if you think the standard separate courses approach works fine (or better.)
Thanks in advance,
CZ