-
CycleTrack and SDN are teaming up to make medical school admissions more transparent and accessible! Read the announcement to learn how we’re supporting the future of CycleTrack’s free application-tracking tools .
Misconceptions about PT
Started by aczerniak
Get help with your application
Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.
This pretty much sums it up for me...
http://www.crackhospital.com/2012/0...ures/08crackhospital-com-ontwitterfacebook02/
http://www.crackhospital.com/2012/0...ures/08crackhospital-com-ontwitterfacebook02/
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Well, unfortunately, many patients (and far too many therapists) think that PT needs to be painful to be succesful, and they define us as personal trainers with a higher degree.
Here are some misconceptions that many licensed PTs have about the profession:
- That posture and muscle performance are related (particularly in the lumbar spine) - http://ptjournal.apta.org/content/67/4/512.full.pdf+html, http://ptjournal.apta.org/content/80/3/261.full.pdf+html
- That we can reliably palpate spinal position and this findings should be used to assist in determining the appropriate intervention - http://biblio.physiotek.com/sites/biblio.physiotek.com/files/10_1.pdf
- That stretching is necessary to prevent injury - http://saveyourself.ca/articles/stretching.php
- That structural assymetries are associated with spinal pain - see attached article.
I can't believe that PT students stretch before running. They should know better! Many of them are exercise science majors too.
Also, PTs need to quit talking about "treatment" and more about "intervention."
I know I'm only a student but I think intervention is a more accurate term to describe what PTs do. Otherwise, all we do is apply ice packs and do ultrasound.
Kevin
You can't believe PT students stretch before running? Stretching can alter the length tension relationship and affect performance negatively if your goal is maximal power output, and research is somewhat inconclusive on stretching however many studies do not show a lower incidence of injury with stretching, but it depends on how far you are running, what you are running on, how fast you are running...That is a really general statement and I think PTs need to avoid making those general statements as it can corner us into stereotypes rather easily. A dynamic warm-up has been shown to increase performance and more effective then static stretching, but there are manyyyy times of stretching. Static, PNF, Dynamic, ballistic, etc. I would be careful about making blanket statements as those especially during clinicals and practicals. My professors would always call us out on those types of things. Just a heads up and thought it was important to point that out.
I would agree, and would add that static stretching doesn't seem to have much use, unless their are large differences in side-to-side ROM post injury.
Yes it was a blanket statement, but I did mean static stretching. How many times have you seen a gym-goer get onto a treadmill and then "stretch" for five minutes? As myr11 said, dynamic stretching is far more beneficial as far as I know. Unfortunately, I rarely see it in a gym or fitness center.
Kevin
Kevin
