mitral stenosis echo criteria - a really stupid question

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Get help with your application

Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.

BelaMedicine

Junior Member
15+ Year Member
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Apologies if this is really basic but I don't understand this.

A normal mitral valve area is 4-6 cm2. In the ASE guidelines where they have a table differentiating the criteria for mild, moderate and severe. It says valve area >1.5 is mild and 1-1.5 is moderate. Gradient for mild is listed as <5.

So what about when you have a valve that appears calcified and not moving totally normally but valve area is lets say 2 or 3. When you go to gradient criteria it says <5 is mild. How do you differentiate or draw the line between mild and normal?? If valve area is less than 4 (which is normal) and gradient is anything less than 5 then by definition this becomes mild. Is that correct??
 
Apologies if this is really basic but I don't understand this.

A normal mitral valve area is 4-6 cm2. In the ASE guidelines where they have a table differentiating the criteria for mild, moderate and severe. It says valve area >1.5 is mild and 1-1.5 is moderate. Gradient for mild is listed as <5.

So what about when you have a valve that appears calcified and not moving totally normally but valve area is lets say 2 or 3. When you go to gradient criteria it says <5 is mild. How do you differentiate or draw the line between mild and normal?? If valve area is less than 4 (which is normal) and gradient is anything less than 5 then by definition this becomes mild. Is that correct??

If any doubt get a TEE
Valve planimetry by 3D probably most accurate IMO
Honestly it really only matters if it’s a severe MS - if it’s mild who cares. Doesn’t even affect need for anticoagulation