More questions about MCAT books

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

premedi-kid

Senior Member
7+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
20+ Year Member
Joined
Apr 12, 2001
Messages
104
Reaction score
0
Which MCAT books are the most comprehensive. Which are the least? Also, what's up with these "gold standard" review books? Are they any good are just hype? Thanks
 
Gold Standard pros:
-follows the MCAT topics guide closely (I especially liked this)
-thorough review of all topics
-practice exams are pretty representative, somewhat harder than the real thing

cons:
-visual layout is not as easy to read as some other books
-lack of practice problems interspersed throughout the review material

I used this as my main review book and was pretty happy with it. I borrowed other review books from the libary for more practice problems, and to skim over their notes.
 
Which book is best is as varied as the people using them. It is my opinion that a coctail works best. A mixture of materials from different sources will give you a broader perspective and exposure to different writing styles. The MCAT has several different writers, so your studying should keep that in mind.

In my opinion, no single company has the best text for all five subjects. As far as passages go, look for the best answer explanations. As for practice exams, look for MCAT realism. You obviously have to buy the AAMC exams first and foremost, but you might want to try at least one exam from each of the four major players (EK, BR, PR, and K). Variety will definitely help you deal with unfamilar passages on your actual MCAT.

Before you put down any money for MCAT materials, make sure they have tons and tons of passages. Doing passages is by far the most important thing. If the books don't have at least a hundred passages with well written, detailed answer explanations, you should look elsewhere for a more useful book.
 
Top