- Joined
- Aug 25, 2003
- Messages
- 197
- Reaction score
- 2
My friend and I were having an argument last week. It was over our future careers. He's gonna concentrate more on Anatomy for our upcoming exam, and leave out large tracts of Biochem.
I argued that biochem was at least, if not more, important to our future abilities to treat patients.
He argued that if he's sitting in his office in fifteen years time, knowledge of anatomy will be of far more importance to him than the TCA cycle! I was banking on the growing no. of metabolic related disorders, e.g. diabetes. I also argued that as a family doctor, and not for example a surgeon, he won't need that detail of anatomical knowledge.
Of all the options outlined above, which do you think is more important for the future? Not just MS2, MS3, etc. but for our future careers.
I argued that biochem was at least, if not more, important to our future abilities to treat patients.
He argued that if he's sitting in his office in fifteen years time, knowledge of anatomy will be of far more importance to him than the TCA cycle! I was banking on the growing no. of metabolic related disorders, e.g. diabetes. I also argued that as a family doctor, and not for example a surgeon, he won't need that detail of anatomical knowledge.
Of all the options outlined above, which do you think is more important for the future? Not just MS2, MS3, etc. but for our future careers.