Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
It didn't seem like there were many MDs/med students in the public health degrees forum, so I was hoping to get some more input from this forum if that's okay.
I'm an MS3 interested in doing Peds ID / Global Health and would love to study/treat ID abroad part-time and work with NGOs like MSF. I've narrowed my options down to Emory and Hopkins.
They both seem to have excellent global health programs, but the latter obviously has the greater overall reputation, and with that, stronger networking opportunities. I haven't received my financial aid packages yet, but Emory would be at least 12k cheaper. Hopkins starts in July and would give me 1 month to study for Step 2. Emory starts in late August and would give me 2.5 months. First year of med school was P/F, and second year I did above average. I scored 220 on Step 1 and have been getting slightly below average on my shelfs. I want to do peds at a competitive location, and Emory is actually one of my top choices because of its Peds Global Health residency. I was hoping to use the 2.5 months to hopefully do much better on Step 2 to improve my chances of landing a spot there. If I pick Hopkins, I'm guessing I'll do average/below average on Step 2 and wouldn't be competitive for Emory or the places I'm interested in. But I would have the networking advantage / name recognition that comes with Hopkins. So my question is: given my career goals, would an MPH from a more reputable institution be worth the (high) risk of not matching into a competitive peds residency of my choice?
Would really appreciate any feedback. Thanks.
I'm an MS3 interested in doing Peds ID / Global Health and would love to study/treat ID abroad part-time and work with NGOs like MSF. I've narrowed my options down to Emory and Hopkins.
They both seem to have excellent global health programs, but the latter obviously has the greater overall reputation, and with that, stronger networking opportunities. I haven't received my financial aid packages yet, but Emory would be at least 12k cheaper. Hopkins starts in July and would give me 1 month to study for Step 2. Emory starts in late August and would give me 2.5 months. First year of med school was P/F, and second year I did above average. I scored 220 on Step 1 and have been getting slightly below average on my shelfs. I want to do peds at a competitive location, and Emory is actually one of my top choices because of its Peds Global Health residency. I was hoping to use the 2.5 months to hopefully do much better on Step 2 to improve my chances of landing a spot there. If I pick Hopkins, I'm guessing I'll do average/below average on Step 2 and wouldn't be competitive for Emory or the places I'm interested in. But I would have the networking advantage / name recognition that comes with Hopkins. So my question is: given my career goals, would an MPH from a more reputable institution be worth the (high) risk of not matching into a competitive peds residency of my choice?
Would really appreciate any feedback. Thanks.
Last edited: