MSTP - what if.....

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

fonzy

Senior Member
7+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
20+ Year Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2002
Messages
284
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I am just curious about this scenario:

An applicant gets into MSTP; does MD part for two yrs then decides to just finish MD and do Phd later [maybe during residency] or just discontinue MSTP. But MSTP has already paid for two yrs.
What happens in such situations? Does the med school get angry or ask for the money back?
Has anyone known such situation?

Thanks for your response!
 
There's no doubt that they would get very angry. People looking for a free ride through (a part of) medschool are a serious problem for MD/PhD programs. Even if one presumably doesn't go into the whole deal with that intention, it's still a problem.

Whether they require you to pay it back is another issue. For the most part, it depends on the school. A true NIH MSTP position should not.
I'm sure you see the problem, however, with asking this question in advance, as an applicant. I always felt it was sort of a taboo. I'm a bit torn, as I think one has the right to know, but on the other hand, it really sends off a wrong message.

Perhaps someone else has more experience/insight...
 
I guess I would have partially agree with Surge, in that schools would probably get slightly ticked off. Obviously, they selected you out of many other candidates for a fully funded position, that you later turned down.

BUT, on the other hand, there is no point in doing a half hearted PhD, that may even reflect badly on their graduate research division. The school in that situation would at least be satisfied that you were honest, and pursued what you really from their school.

So in general, most MSTPs will let you change your mind, but I would guess that they would give their best shot at talking you out of it.

best
 
University of Utah makes you sign a contract stating that if you drop out of the program in ANY year, you must pay back tuition and stipend for the years attended. Incentive to stay in the program. . . And ya'll know I am not about the free ride, but when they stuck that contract in my face, I shyed away from Utah. I started thinking what if something happens in the future that makes it impossible for me to finish school (ie death in the family, nuclear holocaust, personal injury). . . I don't like to sell my soul to anyone for any reason.
 
I don't think MSTPs are allowed to do that, while MD/PhD programs often do it. I'm ready to e-mail the NIH and ask them if MSTPs are allowed to get back tuition if you drop the PhD. Anyone know an official policy?
 
I was told by a PD at one of the interviews that if it's NIH MSTP, they cannot ask for the repayment. That's unfortunately all the information I have.... Has anyone actually talked to someone in the NIH?
 
I think we are getting info' and different perspectives on this isuue.

I have raised this issue as I am certainly applying to MSTp [depending on my MCAT scores].
However sometimes i wonder if it could be possible to do [or combinr] the PhD work with your residency. If MSTP could allow that flexibility, it would be great for some people. I also wonder how one feels after getting detached from MD after two yrs. Would it not be better to finish the MD first? That way the Phd work would have more experience [real world problem] oriented and thus more practical and useful.

Well, let us keep talking...

Thanks
 
I went ahead and e-mailed Dr. Shapiro of the NIH with this question. He is the listed contact on the NIH website for MSTP questions. I could attempt to paraphrase, but his eloquent answer is worth posting. I hope he won't mind my public disclosure:

"Our explicit policy for MSTP programs is that once a person is on MSTP funds he must not be obligated for any further non-MSTP support he receives. He also must be supported for his entire dual degree training. The only minor hitch is for students who enter the program and are paid out of University funds in the first year or two and then drop out. We have no say about the Medical School trying to recoup the scholarship. However, we strongly frown on this practice and, of the nearly 40 MSTP medical schools, I would be surprised if more than one or two have ever tried this.

Incidentally, I am a strong supporter of MSTP programs. There are some non-MSTP dual programs that are trying hard to make the grade, and a couple of funded programs are on probation, or semiprobation, or may run into trouble when they come up for renewal. Nevertheless, I strongly support the MSTP-funded programs as a guarantee of exacting review and oversight."

So I went ahead and e-mailed Mayo about this. Before they went MSTP they required a form stating that if you withdraw, you owe them the money back. I wonder what they'll say now...
 
Neuronix,

Thank you so much!

Great move! I really appreciate your doing all this.

However, I still would like to know how people feel about negotiating with MSTP regarding finishing MD first and then working on PhD during residency as I have described in my earlier post. I know the school might change for the residenchy part; hence for the PhD part; and the school may not be MSTP sponsored. But if you were to stay in the same school for your residency, would MSTP allow you to do as mentioned above?

thanks and best
 
Originally posted by fonzy
An applicant gets into MSTP; does MD part for two yrs then decides to just finish MD and do Phd later [maybe during residency] or just discontinue MSTP. But MSTP has already paid for two yrs.

I am guessing schools that have no real policy on this would not really WANT you to stick around and finish up the last two years of MD. From chatting with MSTP students at my institution, there have been a couple of people try this but they were not allowed to finish the MD-they were told to withdraw completely and then reapply (and no, they were not accepted again probably because they seemed fickle and dishonest-to get admitted MSTP, you have to put on a song and a dance. If you are not committed to science you have to be quite an actor). I know you can do the first two years of MD, then finish your PhD and quit with no real issues (I know this has happened at UConn, UCHSC and MUSC MSTPs among others).

Originally posted by fonzy
However, I still would like to know how people feel about negotiating with MSTP regarding finishing MD first and then working on PhD during residency as I have described in my earlier post. I know the school might change for the residenchy part; hence for the PhD part; and the school may not be MSTP sponsored. But if you were to stay in the same school for your residency, would MSTP allow you to do as mentioned above?

I have a feeling that this kind of negotiation will not go over well with most adcoms. Besides, if you want to go all the way, you will have to do a residency and a post-doc fellowship. I know there are post-doc/residency programs for those who are committed to research. So basically, another combined prorgam awaits you after MD/PhD.

The big risk schools take with students getting the MD first is that they may hit residency and be swept away-never to return to the lab again. The debt-ridden starving resident is seduced by the high-paying attending position. (I am not saying that I would be any different in that position)

On the other hand, I know that UIC (not MSTP, but still fully funded) is receptive to the idea that students can do their MD and PhD in any order. I personally know of no other programs with this policy.

If you really dislike the 2+3/4+2 combination, then maybe you may want to consider doing MD and PhD separately and footing the bill for yourself. That way you are not a potential liability to programs and you can have your freedom, leaving a slot to an
applicant who is enthusiastic about the established program format.

Aside from the financial benefit and the slight time compression-I have also noticed something about 2+3/4+2 MD/PhD that I did not see before. The first two years of medical school followed by the PhD makes for exciting and edgy dissertations unlike those of conventional graduate students. I have read several from both routes, and I must say-the perspective that combined degree students have is truly unique.

So good luck with the route you choose and be sure to keep us posted.
 
Originally posted by Neuronix
There are some
non-MSTP dual programs that are trying hard to make the grade, and a couple of funded programs are on probation, or semiprobation, or may run into trouble when they come up for renewal.

Does anyone know which programs are on probation? Is this public info, will the NIH tell us if we ask?
 
Originally posted by CaNEM
Does anyone know which programs are on probation? Is this public info, will the NIH tell us if we ask?
lol! ummm COLUMBIA :laugh:
seriously though - one of my interviewers there mentioned that columbia had come pretty close to losing its MSTP-ness on its most recent program review
 
Is it true that it's largely due to the time they keep the students in?
 
Yo hey I think Columbia's deal was that last time the NIH came to review the program, the school really didn't make any sort of effort to impress the visitors. In addition, there were issues with numbers of women and minorities in the program. To my knowledge, I don't think it had to do with length of the program (Columbia has consistently managed 50/50 on 7 and 8 year graduates so far as I can tell). I think that was about 5 years ago, and I'm sure that on the next review these will be non-issues. But yeah, we managed to piss off the NIH a few years back. There is definitely no danger of our losing funding now, though. The program is looking to expand and gives excellent compensation ($25k plus for next year).

Rumors and hearsay from when I was applying last year: I heard Harvard and UCSF were on probation for keeping people too long (around 10 yrs?). I don't know how true this is, but it was the word on the street.

Anyways I don't think the probation thing is a big deal (they're not about to cut funding to Columbia, Harvard, or UCSF)...it's just a way for them to threaten schools to get their act together and go along with the MSTP goals as set by the NIH.
 
hey - perhaps canem can comment - he e-mailed bert shapiro (head of mstp's @ nih) about this stuff - and he said that columbia is on solid ground right now, though it has had problems in the past. he said they worked really hard to overhaul the program, new leadership, recruiting, attention to mstp's etc... and it is doing well as a program.

under nancy andrews @ harvard - their prgram has been restructured and been made more mstp friendly. there graduation times should bea bit lower, probably hovering around 8 years. i believe their stipend is only slightly supplemented by the school (base stipend by nih is around 15k? - harvards is around 18k i think - someone can correct me on that if not)

ucsf has made some improtant additions to their program like requiring an mstp committee member on phd thesis committee so they can't just keep on sending you back to do frivolous experiments- a clock watcher for you - and allowing med courses to count for some grad. the rents in the sf area have gone down a lot in the past years - and the stipend has gone up (around 25k as well).

these site reviews can really spark some change in the programs, and most take heed to the advice.
 
Is the UCSF stipend really that high? I was out there in SF yesterday and two of my friends (UCSF MSTP's) seemed very impressed by my Columbia stipend. They did inform me, however, that the NIH apparently approved a $120/month raise for all MSTP stipends starting in July (I gotta find out about that, hopefully ours can go up even more for next year). I didn't ask specifically, but I got the feeling that UCSF's stipend is significantly less than $25k. But hey, I could be wrong.
 
Originally posted by ATLien1224
Is the UCSF stipend really that high? I was out there in SF yesterday and two of my friends (UCSF MSTP's) seemed very impressed by my Columbia stipend. They did inform me, however, that the NIH apparently approved a $120/month raise for all MSTP stipends starting in July (I gotta find out about that, hopefully ours can go up even more for next year). I didn't ask specifically, but I got the feeling that UCSF's stipend is significantly less than $25k. But hey, I could be wrong.

Yes, a stipend increase was recently announced, bringing it close to $25k.
 
Originally posted by fonzy
.However sometimes I wonder if it could be possible to do [or combinr] the PhD work with your residency. If MSTP could allow that flexibility, it would be great for some people. I also wonder how one feels after getting detached from


Hi Fonzy,

Not sure why I'm just getting aroung to reading this thread , anyway...................... I'm serioulsy considering exactly what you propose here in terms of when to get the PhD. There's always a lot of emphasis on MSTP Md/PhD programs as if that's the ONLY way to go. Let me assure you, it isn't.

I shadow an MD/PhD from UPenn and she thinks the 2 +3/4 +2 way of doing the MD/PhD is pretty senseless for the reason you stated above. For this reason, I think I'll end up completing my PhD research in a pathology residency.

As for funding concerns, I don't have any. NIH has alternative sources of funding for an MD/PhD. I also don't mind the idea of borrowing money (should it come to this) to pay for the MD portion of my education. Bottom line is that I've pretty much decided that my family life is as important as my career so I'll only be looking at flexible MD/PhD options. Traditionlly, MSTP funded programs aren't that flexible and almost always require lab only dissertation research whcih I'm not interested in.

Finally, the concern I have especially for MD/PhD applicants in their late 20's (both female and male) is that you have a finite amount of time to have a family. In getting yourself caught up in a program that's not flexible, you may also be indirectly making family decisions as well. Some of you aren't thinking of this now but let me assure you that it won't be long before you do. And why is it that family issues are NEVER discussed on the MD/PhD forums?
 
i discovered this forum only a few weeks ago (i wish i had known about it all along! i would have loved to have had more advice on this whole process!), and have been reading your responses.

this whole family thing really bothers me. i applied this year to mstps and have been accepted to several amazing programs. however, now that i'm about to enter into this long path, i am even more unsure that i really want to do both degrees. the mstp is really long, and as you have said, unflexible. having a family is really important to me, and i cannot imagine any sort of happiness unless i have children (i'm not scary, really!). however, i can't imagine how i will handle patient care, running a research lab, and a family. or how i will manage having children during the phd or residency years. i basically am going on a blind faith that it will all work out in the end, but there are so few female role models out there. can women mdphds really have it all? or is this just a myth? will it be a mistake to believe i can have it all? do any of you worry about this? what if my priorities change? and family is just as important as research?

i'm choosing among several top-notch programs, and the typical length of the program is now one major concern of mine. i am planning on deferring matriculation for a year, and now feel like i should live life as i want and do the things i want to do. afterall, family is a major concern, but how can i make all my decisions based on things that will happen in the future? however, i know that i will get antsy the deeper i get into my training. and i don't want to be in the md/phd program for 9 years (as it can be in some programs)!

we're young. we know what we want now (and even i often don't). but what if want something different in 3 years? i don't want to be in a program that locks me in.
 
clearly, you will have to make sacrifices in your life for the sake of the MD/PhD program. But this doesn't preclude having a family (even for the women MSTP-ers).

MD's have families. PhD's have families. Why can't an MD/PhD??

obviously it's much easier for us guys. but ladies, it can be done...you can have kids during the PhD portion of your training. It is more flexible. Data analysis, etc. is not physically demanding, and if things are timed well (ie, the pregnancy, lab experiments), you can literally work out of your house for at least part of your training.

You can have kids between med school and residency. Taking a year off is no big deal. You can have a kid in the middle of your residency, perhaps during a research year.

and if you feel you are really missing out on something, think twice about doing MSTP. You have to enter it wholeheartedly or you won't benefit from the training.

best of luck.
 
euterpe,
there is nothign at all odd about your thoughts - really important to think about. some programs are very flexible about this - and in others it would be really difficult. you should ask if people have had kids while in the programs, and some places like yale definatly have and are very flexible about family life. other programs that are more highly structured, like cornell for instnace, would make some of it a bit difficult i imagine.

also a side note: i just found out that stanford is on probation from the nih.
 
Some of the posts in this thread are thought provoking and get at the core criticisms of MSTPs. I'd like to put my pro-MSTP spin on things, and try to answer some questions as best as I can. We all know that MSTP is not right for everyone, but it is good to be thinking about whether it is right for you.

And why is it that family issues are NEVER discussed on the MD/PhD forums?

You're looking at a fairly homogenious population on the pre-MSTP forum. The regulars, with a few exceptions (most notably you pathdr), are a bunch of young (under 25) males. The females that we do have here are also young, and generally do not have families. I think that concerns about family and length of training keep most older and family-oriented applicants away from MD/PhD and is a deterrant for many applicants considering MSTP. This is not to say that it deterrs them all. For example, last week at the Baylor second look two of the applicants had children, including one young woman with a 4 year old, and one young man with a 6 month old. Both of the parents of my Baylor student host are MD/PhDs.

My impression is that the forum reflects a diminished amount of diversity seen in MD/PhD programs, especially when compared to PhD or MD programs alone. MD/PhD programs have an increasingly high percentage of male students and are dominated by younger individuals. Nevertheless, I don't want to make this sound more negative than it really is. There is a good percentage of minorities and families in MSTP now, and anyone with an interest in MSTPs is trying to recruit a diverse population to MSTP training. In fact, one of my bosses is a female MD/PhD. Unique perspectives from people all of all ages and orientations is good for everyone in and impacted by medical science.

The concern I have especially for MD/PhD applicants in their late 20's (both female and male) is that you have a finite amount of time to have a family.

There is nothing that says you cannot have a family while you are in training. Many students in MD or PhD programs have families when entering or have children during their programs. There is no reason you cannot do the same during a MD/PhD. Many students do it, and I am sure if you contact any program of decent size, you will be able to find at least one female contact with children.

One important consideration when you choose the program you will enter is how flexible the program is with your decision to have a family. I don't think any program is going to putting time limits on its students and if you need to work less hours during graduate school or take a year off, this will be perfectly acceptable. Sure there are other considerations with the medical school, but in general things can be worked out if you decide to go this way.

I shadow an MD/PhD from UPenn and she thinks the 2 +3/4 +2 way of doing the MD/PhD is pretty senseless for the reason you stated above. For this reason, I think I'll end up completing my PhD research in a pathology residency.

Opinions on exactly how you get your MD/PhD and if a MD/PhD is even necessary AT ALL vary widely depending on who you talk to. I've talked to many individuals (None of them MD/PhDs) who think that getting both degrees is a waste of time for any field of work. I don't understand why getting your PhD during residency is more flexible than getting your PhD in a MSTP? Residency is still very time consuming, and you will probably still end up putting the same amount of years into your training.

i basically am going on a blind faith that it will all work out in the end, but there are so few female role models out there. can women mdphds really have it all? or is this just a myth? will it be a mistake to believe i can have it all? do any of you worry about this? what if my priorities change? and family is just as important as research?

So my boss is a female MD/PhD but she does not have any children. I asked her though, and she says that everyone she knows who did MD/PhD ended up having children, either during training or after. Going back after Baylor again (sorry, Baylor is just fresh in my mind after second look), one of the prominant researchers there, Huda Zoghbi, is HHMI, very successful, and has several children. She is another one who heavily attempts to bring women into MD/PhD.

we're young. we know what we want now (and even i often don't). but what if want something different in 3 years? i don't want to be in a program that locks me in.

No MSTP locks you in. The NIH will not let them for this exact reason. If you decide research is too long and too forboding for you, you can drop MSTP and owe nothing from the first two years of medical school. Beware the non-MSTPs (and Mayo, but I'm sure they'll fix this) on this issue, as some require you to sign contracts before you begin the program. The attrition rate from MSTPs back to medical school is fairly high (25% I've heard?), and I think that for this reason, medical schools are very very willing to please and accomidate you as best they can. As for residency programs... I'd be surprised if they'd be as motivated to help.

Traditionlly, MSTP funded programs aren't that flexible and almost always require lab only dissertation research whcih I'm not interested in.

In the regard of research type, they tend not to be so flexible. But, this is the nature of the MSTP beast. It is for training in basic science research. I know that clinical research training goals may be better suited by other pathways. Still, even for a career in clinical reseach, I think that a background in basic science is very helpful. This is one more reason the MSTP exists.

As a conclusion, MSTPs are not nearly as inflexible as some believe they are. There are many who are having families and doing well in MD/PhD and the programs are actively recruiting students to proceed in this direction. Sure, it will take hard work and compromise, but any kind of work and family takes compromise. In the end, remember that there are many contacts out there (and if you still need some just let me know) who are doing the MD/PhD career with children and even if things get too bad, you are not locked into any MSTP.
 
Those are some great answers Neuronix, definitely puts me at ease before I start out . . . would have been nice to have you at Mayo.
 
hi neuronix,
that's possibly the longest post i've evar seen during my time here. awesome!!!! 😀
 
Originally posted by chef
hi neuronix,
that's possibly the longest post i've evar seen during my time here. awesome!!!! 😀

Hey Neuronix, you're not putting in "extra effort" in your posts in this forum because you were given moderator powers, were you? 😛 Nice post and good idea to put the mstp faq sticky as the top thread.
 
Top