In training, for our patients with narrow angles s/p LPI (with appropriate improvement in angle anatomy) and no evidence of glaucomatous damage to nerves, we still tended to get yearly HVF/OCT nerves.
I was curious what the logical reason for this was. I understand the need to get maybe one HVF + OCT nerve to see if there was damage while the patient was narrow, indicating intermittent attacks, but once you have one normal HVF and OCT nerve (after LPI treatment), why the need for repeated yearly tests?
If you treated the narrow angle with your LPI and the angle opens up, shouldn't their risk be essentially the same as everyone else with a normal angle anatomy?
Thanks!
I was curious what the logical reason for this was. I understand the need to get maybe one HVF + OCT nerve to see if there was damage while the patient was narrow, indicating intermittent attacks, but once you have one normal HVF and OCT nerve (after LPI treatment), why the need for repeated yearly tests?
If you treated the narrow angle with your LPI and the angle opens up, shouldn't their risk be essentially the same as everyone else with a normal angle anatomy?
Thanks!