NEED HELP PLEASE from anyone who has taken the DAT

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

OC1314

Full Member
15+ Year Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2008
Messages
187
Reaction score
4
So the DAT date is coming up and I am working on QR prep. I seem to do really well on the topscore and destroyer QR sections. But I am working on the crack dat math and I am struggling ALOT. I wanted to know from people who have taken the DAT, which is more representative of the difficulty level. I know people say that cdm is good for timing and it does contain errors. But just concerning the question types, what is more realistic. I have done 5 cdm tests and I am not doing that well. Response appreciated.
 
destroyer QR was like the real thing.. i dont know about CDM.. make sure u have the timing down on destroyer.

try to make a better, and more representative title

imagine if everyone made a title like yours.. no1 would read anything.
 
So the DAT date is coming up and I am working on QR prep. I seem to do really well on the topscore and destroyer QR sections. But I am working on the crack dat math and I am struggling ALOT. I wanted to know from people who have taken the DAT, which is more representative of the difficulty level. I know people say that cdm is good for timing and it does contain errors. But just concerning the question types, what is more realistic. I have done 5 cdm tests and I am not doing that well. Response appreciated.

CDM taught you about how to time yourself. The level of difficulty is harder than the real test.
 
I used Kaplan blue book and topscore for my preparation (last year). I remembered that I got 30s from Kaplan bb(and CD) and I do not remember my topscore (it can be 30 too). I only got 23 on real thing. Do not trust those two (in real DAT you may have statistic, optical physics, compound interest and very wordy problems that you did not see in there). This is my warning. Hopefully, you will get easier version and kill that section.
 
Top