lakeshow said:
Just wondering if anyone knows an answer to this? I finished my undergrad in 1996 (BS in biology) and met all prereqs to medical school. GPA is low (3.1). Should I retake some of the science classes? I heard from someone that if classes were taken more than 7 years ago, they need to be repeated. Is this true? Assuming that I will do well on the MCAT in april, 2007(not planning to apply until next year), let's say 30+, what are my chances of getting in med schools , for both DO and MD? I forgot to mention that I am 32 years old and also a practicing pharmacist. I am currently shadowing both a DO and an MD in a non-profit clinic. Thanks in advance for any advice, suggestion.
Here's some food for thought:
"Many different variables have been used in an attempt to predict performance in medical school, residency, and practice. The extensive literature on this subject has been reviewed and evaluated. Admission to medical school should not be based solely on grade point average and Medical College Admission Test scores because these offer no measure of extremely important noncognitive attributes. Although performance in the preclinical years is predicted by the grade point average and Medical College Admission Test scores, no such correlation exists for achievements in the clinical years, for postgraduate training, or as physicians" - Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research. (362):72-77, May 1999.
Reede, Joan Y. MD, MPH, MS
Dr. Reede's study has been reiterated hundreds of times - all with the same conclusion: there is no way to predict success in medicine by using grades and MCAT scores. This is backed up by my own personal, highly speculative, research where I found that:
1. My advisor who is a highly successful electrophysiologist and Mayo Clinic Alum, entered Med school with a 2.7 gpa and a 25 on the MCAT.
2. Several of my wife's clients are married to doctors, one of whom:
Has a highly successful opthamology practice, also providing emergency eye surgery and care. This doctor had a 2.66 Gpa and a 24 on the MCAT.
Conversely, At my last MCAT practice exam at Princeton Review, super-wienie, the wonder chemist proudly displayed his "40" score that he received, but was "surprisingly" rejected by all of the med schools he applied to. Oh, and he humbly reminded us that he only had a 3.97 Gpa in Chemistry. He'll be a doctor when 93 year old grandmother beats me in the weight room.
Also, a very nice, and way-too-smart, co-student at U of H has a 3.98 in Biochem and got a 39 on the MCAT and she can't get into med school either. Why? She isn't a wienie, but she has never done anything except absorb facts from a book.
So, summing all of this up, we come to the conclusion that a). nobody has a magic formula, b). being brilliant is cool, but not necessarily helpful, c). medicine apparently needs well-rounded (not fat) women and men who want to serve humanity and aren't just trying to say, "I'm a doctor", which is rapidly losing its prestige anyway.
Medicine is one of the three classic disciplines of man, the other two being theology and law. If you want to be a doctor, then you should be a doctor. It's rather obvious (since you are already a pharmacist) that you wouldn't be doing it for the money, and if you are passionate about it, I say, "damn the torpedoes - full speed ahead" or something along those lines.
BTW, this weekend, I met some people who have a VERRRRRRYYYYY cool job related to medicine which if I weren't becoming a doctor to serve God I would look into, which is Biomedical research for the government. One gentleman I met has been to Iraq and Afghanistan and works out of the Brooks research center in San Antonio. He gets to wear those cool space-looking suits and carry around a flashy-thing that detects unstable isotopes and even picks up errant biologics, like Anthrax (not the rock band).
🙂