JennyW,
Every-time I make a statement, you point out every possible loop in the theoretical analogy. I'm saying you would save 25k by replacing the current manager, not find a way to save 25k is changes in the operations of the office. I guarantee that you would save some money in your office with you as manager than any employee would as manager. Plus, from the employees in every office, business, or clinic that I have ever observed, I would bet that most any of us would be able to replace 2 full time staff in an office. Therefore, if I were disabled and still had my hands and full brain function, I could run my office as manager while working part time.
As far as there being no partnership...what definition of partnership are you using? If I own the practice, and I sell you part of MY practice, we are now partners. We will be partners even if I stop working. As long as I own part of it, we would be partners. Have you ever heard of a silent partner? These are people who put up the money (usually), but let someone else run the business. The silent partner is rarely around or sometimes knows very little of the operations, but they are still...partners.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCLAIMER:
I'm sure there are plenty of mistakes in the above post, but if you agree with the general statement, don't bother pointing out the implied generalities. These generalities where left in the post with the assumption that anyone with an IQ above 80 could draw the implied conclusions. I have also left off the pie charts and fiscal graphs explaining the financial statement made in the above post because any statement made in said post was made with intension that these statement were for giving EXAMPLES of what could happen, not absolutes.