I understand that histology is low yield material for Step I, which is why I don't want to spend way too much time studying it. I have Netter's Histo Flashcards already. Does anyone know if these flashcards are sufficient to study for at least the non-histopath material? I was looking at BRS Histo and it looks like overkill compared to this.
-
CycleTrack and SDN are teaming up to make medical school admissions more transparent and accessible! Read the announcement to learn how we’re supporting the future of CycleTrack’s free application-tracking tools .
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Step I Netter's Histo Flashcards Sufficient?
Started by prn2oblivion
Get help with your application
Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.
I understand that histology is low yield material for Step I, which is why I don't want to spend way too much time studying it. I have Netter's Histo Flashcards already. Does anyone know if these flashcards are sufficient to study for at least the non-histopath material? I was looking at BRS Histo and it looks like overkill compared to this.
i have netter's histo, anatomy, musculo, and neuro cards on my iphone and browse through a few whenever i'm afk. i wouldn't rate any of them very highly as there's a predominance of low yield stuff (i.e. an h&e section of the eyelid). realistically the odds favor seeing a TEM of the renal filtration barrier, the squamocolumnar junction in the cervix, and maybe a TEM of a sarcomere. the rest is basically a crapshoot.
i also have lange biochem, micro, pharm, and path and tend to use those more often as they probably cover 60+% of what you'll see on your test. not bad for under 1000 cards.
i've checked out brs micro, pharm and anatomy and trashed them after a few minutes.
Thanks for the response rahulb. So, are you saying that Netter's Histo Flash is overkill too? What would you say is adequate material for a low yield topic like histo?
if you're having problems identifying sections try thumbing through rapid review path and stare at the pictures/captions. if the problem lies in answering histology-based questions (i.e. zellwegers, i-cell, refsum's etc) try the kaplan lecture notes which can be done in a few hours.
i thought first aid + uworld/qbank is enough for most of the images. i haven't really seen anything that completely stumped me. when it comes to media-based Qs, i try to visualize everything i read in first aid as it would appear under a microscope and on gross section. if i can't come up with a rough mental picture, i'll wiki it.
i thought first aid + uworld/qbank is enough for most of the images. i haven't really seen anything that completely stumped me. when it comes to media-based Qs, i try to visualize everything i read in first aid as it would appear under a microscope and on gross section. if i can't come up with a rough mental picture, i'll wiki it.
i thought first aid + uworld/qbank is enough for most of the images.
Ditto. I did not review a single histo text/resource prior to step1. I would have if I had time, but priority wise it was low & I never got to it. I don't regret it - that subject as a whole basically didn't appear on my exam...