- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 993
- Reaction score
- 773
Any recommendations for students looking for neuropsych experience and training in a non-neuropsych program?
It is extraordinarily unlikely that UT Southwestern is going to admit an online school graduate into their Ph.D. program. They also don't have a Psy.D. program.
Is it possible to meet the criteria in the Houston Conference guidelines and for eventually passing the boards for clinical neuropsychology while not being in a neuropsych program and not working in a neuropsych lab or with a neuropsych POI/mentor? Are the aforementioned practicum experiences (VA, AMC, online courses, workshops, etc.) sufficient to meet them? Would one still be competitive for neuropsych-related internships and post-docs?
It's possible. I would just be trying my darndest to get the neuro stuff documented. Make sure you're getting a decent amount of prac time doing neuro assessments. Also, if you can, try to get your dissertation to involve neuro research if you can. If you can't get those things, it'll be an uphill battle to be competitive for solid internships/postdocs in the neuro world.
I was looking at the handbooks for various clinical programs, trying to see if they provided sufficient training for neuropsych in addition to potential POIs working in neuropsych and then comparing them with what I could find about the Houston Conference Guidelines.
None of them seem to have much in the way of specialized didactic coursework in some of the more neuro-focused topics, e.g. basic neurosciences, functional neuroanatomy, neuropathology, clinical neurology, etc.
Is this typical for programs that eventually lead to one specializing in clinical neuropsychology or are these specific ones I've looked at lacking in this regard to neuropsych? Where do students typically get this more specialized didactic work if not through courses in their programs?
My advisor was a neuropsychologist, although our program didn't have any tracks. Both for myself and the "average" application I've reviewed, I'd say it's atypical to not have any formal neuropsych coursework.
However, when the classes are offered and what they're called can vary substantially. The topics listed in the Houston Conference guidelines are generally just content areas, which might be covered in a variety of specific courses.
Would it be a good idea to ask how the didactic coursework and practica experiences conform to the Houston Conference guidelines and prepare one for boarding if they were to get an interview at one of these programs? Would it also be looked upon favorably as a sign one is well-informed and knows what they are getting into by focusing in neuropsych?
Those are certainly valid and fair questions, and I'd imagine many neuropsych folks would be happy to have a grad school applicant asking them (e.g., shows knowledge of the field and training guidelines, and a desire to ultimately pursue boarding, which is generally a plus).
I was looking at the handbooks for various clinical programs, trying to see if they provided sufficient training for neuropsych in addition to potential POIs working in neuropsych and then comparing them with what I could find about the Houston Conference Guidelines.
None of them seem to have much in the way of specialized didactic coursework in some of the more neuro-focused topics, e.g. basic neurosciences, functional neuroanatomy, neuropathology, clinical neurology, etc.
Is this typical for programs that eventually lead to one specializing in clinical neuropsychology or are these specific ones I've looked at lacking in this regard to neuropsych? Where do students typically get this more specialized didactic work if not through courses in their programs?