Neutralization Question

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

HopefulOncoDoc

Full Member
10+ Year Member
Joined
Mar 26, 2009
Messages
85
Reaction score
0
Hey guys sorry if this question is a bit easy but I just had a quick question as I'm having trouble understand a specific part of the solution. So the question is...

How many mL's of 0.60 M HCl are required to neutralize 3.0 grams CaCO3?
A. 50 mL
B. 100 mL
C. 200 mL
D. 300 mL

I put A initially but the answer was B. Anyways on the solution they put

moles of OH- = 2 x moles CO3 2- = (M H+)(V H+)

I'm confused as to why we are multiplying 2 x mol CO3 2- . Shouldn't we be multiplying 2 x (M H+)(V H+) since according to the balanced equation

CaCO3 (s) + 2HCl (aq) <---> CaCl2 (aq) + CO2 (g) + H2O (l)

for every CaCO3 we react with 2HCl? Thanks a lot everyone.
 
shouldn't the equation be

2CaCO3 (s) + 4HCl (aq) <---> 2CaCl2 (aq) + 2H2CO3

Every one of your coefficients is divisible by 2


OP, the reaction equation Cartman wrote is correct. Carbonate (CO3--) is a dianion, so it gets protonated twice to form carbonic acid (H2CO3), which decomposes to CO2 and H2O
 
Hey guys thanks for the response. Sorry I feel so stupid...I know CO32- is going to get protonated twice so shouldnt we need 2 equivalents of HCl to do that? And so knowing that I'm just confused as to why shouldn't it be

2 (M H+)(V H+) = moles CO3 2-
 
For every mole of carbonate, you need two moles of HCl. So if I tell you the value of [CO3^2-], you need to multiply that by two to get [H+]. Your equation implies that for every mole of HCl, you have two moles of carbonate.
 
For every mole of carbonate, you need two moles of HCl. So if I tell you the value of [CO3^2-], you need to multiply that by two to get [H+]. Your equation implies that for every mole of HCl, you have two moles of carbonate.

Ah Yes I see that makes a lot sense. Thanks a lot guys!
 
Sorry to butt in, but I'm somewhat lost.

Even though Carbonate is protonated twice, isn't the equilibrium constant very small; definitely not 100% yield, possibly a 1% of the reaction proceeds to form OH-. So why are we assuming in this case that it will be a quantitative reaction and the # moles CO32- = 2x moles OH-? I would assume it'd be a lot smaller.

Maybe i'm thinking of this wrong and it has nothing to do with ice tables or Ka values?
 
The overall reaction will proceed to completion because the reaction between H+ and OH- will go to completion.
 
apologies to dig up an old question. but instead of using the formula (which is essentially # of moles of acid == # of moles of base -- for a neutralization reaction), i tried to solve this using a slightly inconvenient method.. but can't seem to arrive at the same answer..

100gm CaCO3 requires 73gm HCL to allow neutraliziation
3gm CaCO3 will need (3*73)/100gm HCL

0.6M HCL contains 0.6 moles HCL in 1000ml soln
therefore, (3*73/100) moles HCL will require (3*73)*1000/(100*.6)

the answer obviously isn't the same (and incorrect), but i can't seem to rationalize why 🙁
 
nowhere have you incorporated the MW of HCl into your equations, so how are you converting from grams HCl to moles HCl
 
Ah, gotcha, just did a quick glance and saw that missing, will look through them more closely, just a min

therefore, (3*73/100) moles HCL will require

What're you jumping to here? Why do you need that many moles of HCl? That's how many grams you need, not moles. (3*73/100) grams HCl / (36.5 g HCl / mol) = 0.06 mol HCl / (0.6 mol HCl / L) = 100 mL
 
Last edited:
gahhhh....
before going along this track, i was trying to go through TBR Chem chapter on acid/bases, and boy did i feel lost.. made me wonder how the hell did i even graduate.. figured i could use a mood booster, so switched to a topic that i thought i knew.. and viola, the result was an incorrect answer...

many thanks for point out the obvious mistake.. (feeling the MCAT burnout.. .its been 4 months now)..
 

Similar threads

Top