New ICD-10 diagnosis code for Multifidus Dysfunction

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

drusso

Full Member
Moderator Emeritus
Lifetime Donor
Joined
Nov 21, 1998
Messages
13,049
Reaction score
7,582
Anyone here transitioning all RFAs to Reavtiv8?
1000007644.png
 
Members don't see this ad :)
I’ve seen one pissed off Reactiv8 patient. He said it caused more pain and also got infected
 
40,642.04 wsa his 2023 payments. Almost all SCS.
I added this comment to his post.

Doctors are standing by...


Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 18;14(1):21738.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-72554-1.

Effects of platelet-rich plasma injection on electrical activity and biomechanics of the erector spinae muscles in lumbar myofascial pain syndrome​

Na Li 1 2 3, Qian Wang 4, Shaolong Ai 4, Hongchen He 4, Jiayuan He 1 2 3, Ning Jiang 5 6 7
Affiliations Expand

This study looked at people with one-sided lower back muscle pain (myofascial pain syndrome, or MPS) and compared the muscle activity and stiffness on the painful side to the non-painful side. They used two tools—surface electromyography (sEMG) and MyotonPRO a standardized digital palpation device to measure mechanical stiffness of biological tissues—to measure muscle electrical activity and mechanical properties.
Here’s what they found:
  1. Before treatment: The muscles on the painful side were more active and showed differences in how they moved and responded compared to the non-painful side. The painful muscles had higher electrical signals, which means they were overactive, but there wasn’t much difference in muscle stiffness or elasticity.
  2. After treatment: After a single session of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) treatment, the muscle activity on the painful side decreased, and patients reported less pain and better movement. This showed that the PRP treatment helped reduce muscle overactivity and improve symptoms.
In summary, using sEMG and MyotonPRO can help identify muscle problems in people with MPS, and PRP treatment may be effective in reducing pain and improving muscle function.
 
Doctors are standing by...


Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 18;14(1):21738.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-72554-1.

Effects of platelet-rich plasma injection on electrical activity and biomechanics of the erector spinae muscles in lumbar myofascial pain syndrome​

Na Li 1 2 3, Qian Wang 4, Shaolong Ai 4, Hongchen He 4, Jiayuan He 1 2 3, Ning Jiang 5 6 7
Affiliations Expand

This study looked at people with one-sided lower back muscle pain (myofascial pain syndrome, or MPS) and compared the muscle activity and stiffness on the painful side to the non-painful side. They used two tools—surface electromyography (sEMG) and MyotonPRO a standardized digital palpation device to measure mechanical stiffness of biological tissues—to measure muscle electrical activity and mechanical properties.
Here’s what they found:
  1. Before treatment: The muscles on the painful side were more active and showed differences in how they moved and responded compared to the non-painful side. The painful muscles had higher electrical signals, which means they were overactive, but there wasn’t much difference in muscle stiffness or elasticity.
  2. After treatment: After a single session of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) treatment, the muscle activity on the painful side decreased, and patients reported less pain and better movement. This showed that the PRP treatment helped reduce muscle overactivity and improve symptoms.
In summary, using sEMG and MyotonPRO can help identify muscle problems in people with MPS, and PRP treatment may be effective in reducing pain and improving muscle function.
is that the epidemic/scource of the week?

"lumbar myofascial pain syndrome"?

sigh
 
retrospective study of 24 patients. 51 levels, 102 total.

in the abstract and summaries, i see no information on whether the RFA helped with the pain.

hard to draw conclusions on a retrospective study.

suppose.... the RFA does cause atrophy, but the patient has significant improvement of pain. perhaps multifidus spasm is the primary etiology of pain, for which RFA would be appropriate?



so this needs a controlled blinded study to look at not only the muscles and atrophy but link it to pain scores.
 
retrospective study of 24 patients. 51 levels, 102 total.

in the abstract and summaries, i see no information on whether the RFA helped with the pain.

hard to draw conclusions on a retrospective study.

suppose.... the RFA does cause atrophy, but the patient has significant improvement of pain. perhaps multifidus spasm is the primary etiology of pain, for which RFA would be appropriate?



so this needs a controlled blinded study to look at not only the muscles and atrophy but link it to pain scores.

If you told me that my multifidus atrophy was in my head, I'd be pissed...
 
The real joke here is Mainstay is celebrating the new ICD 10 code essentially specific to their device, while not realizing that code makes it really fast and easy for insurance to deny coverage in masse. See also: bundled genicular blocks, SI ablation.
So true
 
Top