Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
So starting back in July, Illinois public aid rules limit people to 4 prescriptions in any rolling 30 day period. It is slowly going into enforcement. The only exempt drugs are birth control, HIV drugs, antibiotics, & organ rejection drugs. Prior auths will be considered off of a limited list of drugs (the list does include most lifesaving, maintenance meds.)
When I first heard this idea, I thought it was bad. Seeing how people are being affected by it, now that its enforcement is being rolled out, I am even more certain that its bad. Too be fair, I am no fan of socialized medicine/single payer medicine/government managed medicine. However, since the government has agreed to provide a medicaid service, I think it is obligated to provide a reasonable & decent one. I do not think 4 prescriptions per 30 days does that.
Take someone with diabetes, they get testing strips, lancets, lantus, Humalog, Whoops they are now maxed out. Hopefully they didn't really need their lisinopril or syringes. Of course, they maybe even more unlucky in the cycle, in that they picked up their lisinopril, syringes, lancets & testing strips last week....so this week they have to pick between getting their lantus or humalog Yes, most likely their PA for their insulin will be approved, but what happens when they are out on a Friday night of a 3 day weekend? Beg their friends for $100+ to get their insulin? Or will they go without for 3 days, and end up in the hospital emergency room, costing the state far more than if the insulin had been paid for to begin with.
It seems to me the state came up with the rule to stop the people who were emergency room hopping to get 10 Norco RX's each month. I can think of much better ways to control prescription costs than a blanket limit of 4 scripts/30 days (especially if such prescription cost control leads to increased medical costs)
Has this sort of thing been implemented in other states? Anyone in Illinois have thoughts on this.
When I first heard this idea, I thought it was bad. Seeing how people are being affected by it, now that its enforcement is being rolled out, I am even more certain that its bad. Too be fair, I am no fan of socialized medicine/single payer medicine/government managed medicine. However, since the government has agreed to provide a medicaid service, I think it is obligated to provide a reasonable & decent one. I do not think 4 prescriptions per 30 days does that.
Take someone with diabetes, they get testing strips, lancets, lantus, Humalog, Whoops they are now maxed out. Hopefully they didn't really need their lisinopril or syringes. Of course, they maybe even more unlucky in the cycle, in that they picked up their lisinopril, syringes, lancets & testing strips last week....so this week they have to pick between getting their lantus or humalog Yes, most likely their PA for their insulin will be approved, but what happens when they are out on a Friday night of a 3 day weekend? Beg their friends for $100+ to get their insulin? Or will they go without for 3 days, and end up in the hospital emergency room, costing the state far more than if the insulin had been paid for to begin with.
It seems to me the state came up with the rule to stop the people who were emergency room hopping to get 10 Norco RX's each month. I can think of much better ways to control prescription costs than a blanket limit of 4 scripts/30 days (especially if such prescription cost control leads to increased medical costs)
Has this sort of thing been implemented in other states? Anyone in Illinois have thoughts on this.
Last edited:
