- Joined
- Feb 21, 2006
- Messages
- 2,884
- Reaction score
- 12
Judging from the rest of the facts, I doubt that breastfeeding is her real issue. In fact, I tend to think that if this is a woman who has had to pay people to read to her due to her ADHD as others pointed out, (keeping in mind other people cope with ADHD just fine by exercising, yoga, medication if worse come to worse on their own. I know because I have some very good friends in real life that have admitted to having to cope with this disease for years), and if this is a woman who has also had dyslexia and failed once before, then it is reasonable to assume that there is a good possibility she's not really doing this in the name of breastfeeding mothers and possibly wants the extra time for other reasons.
Besides, she already had a child once before and she coped so how come she can't cope now?[/QUOTE]
OK, I'm not necessarily disagreeing with the rest of your post (although personally it would not bother me in the least if they granted her extra break time) I am getting a little frustrated that the point about her previous child keeps coming up. Perhaps I'm the one missing something, but someone else said that her older child is 22 months. If we assume this is step 2 she is trying to take then that child likely wasn't born when she took step 1 (at least 2 years ago, and probably more since she's MD/PhD). Remember this whole discussion is specifically pertaining to test taking conditions and the only other time she probably took a test of this length was probably before she had any kids.
Please say you're not serious, I'm begging you.
Of course, your idea is interesting in that it could usher in a whole new era of "welfare moms"!! Young girls getting pregnant and having 10 babies by the age of 24 so they can get a 50% MCAT score raise. Afterall, the admissions process is pretty competitive.
By the way, I work full time, go to school 15 credit hours/semester, and am raising two young children (but am male). Should I get a score increase also?
I guess what rubs me the wrong way is that it has to be an EITHER/OR choice. While I don't think you can be 100% stay-at-home mother and 100% workaholic physician, I do believe that you can do both and do them well.
How is it not a choice? Unless you have an immaculate conception like Mary or have been the victim of rape etc. Regardless, there are only a tiny number of scenarios I can think of where it is not a choice. Why do I get the drift from some women that society forces them to both work and have children. In all honesty, isn't the process of becoming a doctor hard enough without trying to have a baby? Not saying that there is anything wrong with it, (many females do it and pull it off nicely) but if you do then it is your responsibility to deal with it, nobody else's. I may have my preconceived notions or shortcomings but I am willing to listen-so enlighten me.
And some people do both, but requiring exceptions to one in order to do the other isn't doing both well. She's obviously not doing one very well, or she wouldn't need any special concesions.
Or, if you are as unlucky as two of my friends (one a doctor, one a nurse) who both got pregnant while on birth control at quite inconvenient times. Clearly both of these women know how to correctly use birth control, and incidently, neither of them were actually using OCP's anyway - one used Depo and the other NuvaRing. Just wanted to point out that there are responsible women who try their best to plan their pregnancies appropriately and unfortunately it doesn't always work out. Hope you are now enlightened....
And if you'd read my other comments, you would have noticed I disagree with her ridiculous request.
My comment about the "choice" is unrelated to that opinion.
Or, if you are as unlucky as two of my friends (one a doctor, one a nurse) who both got pregnant while on birth control at quite inconvenient times. Clearly both of these women know how to correctly use birth control, and incidently, neither of them were actually using OCP's anyway - one used Depo and the other NuvaRing. Just wanted to point out that there are responsible women who try their best to plan their pregnancies appropriately and unfortunately it doesn't always work out. Hope you are now enlightened....
So she can pump while taking the test? Then she REALLY doesn't need extra time. Its not real easy to pump while doing other things, but I certainly managed to figure it out so she can as well.
Well, I'm not sure she would want to, but yes...they've given her a private room (albeit it must somehow be video monitored for security purposes) so she doesn't have to worry about others in ther with her and said they have no restrictions on pumping while taking the exam.
I imagine it would be hard to do, but obviously do-able. Whether she wants to is another issue, apparently.
Well, maybe she wouldn't want to because its another way to throw a fuss, but really, if she breastfed her first baby for a year and has breastfed this one for four months, she's probably breastfed in public before. Modesty sort of goes out the window after a little while of breastfeeding. Besides, they make clothes that make it even easier to remain somewhat modest when breastfeeding or pumping.
Bravo, NBME. They thankfully realize that this whole silly thing most definitely does not pass the sniff test.
... Even the lactivists appear to be distancing themselves from her.
This has been going on since at least June. That's when she went to the Boston Globe and ABC news. http://www.boston.com/news/local/ma.../board_wont_relent_for_breast_feeding_mother/
http://abcnews.go.com/Health/story?id=3330105&page=1
Looks like she found a lawyer to take her case pro bono and is trying another media blitz. Only the public sympathy seems to be flagging. Even the lactivists appear to be distancing themselves from her. So, even though she's played the victim in the press, cried "discrimination against breast feeding women," and filed suit against NBME to force them to give her what she wants, NBME is still holding the line. Gotta love em!
Many of them were from women working in self-described "blue collar" professions who were appalled at the "elitism"
Sad. These people will likely think she represents all medical professionals, or at least all female doctors. They will come to us (well...hopefully me in many many years). They will have this idea of elitism in the back of their minds and from the very beginning there is a block to open communication.
Sorry. I failed to keep it down while reading that article. Talk about biased journalism.
I was interested in the info that NBME is providing her with a private room to take her exam. She doesn't even have to leave the room to pump, thereby saving her several minutes as well. She doesn't mention this in her blog. They have also given her a schedule of how to pump and fit it into the day.
Heck, I would have liked to have had a private room, all the better not to hear the incessant throat clearing of the guy next to me...which the ear plugs COULD NOT drown out.😳
I was distracted by those test-takers who were furiously typing away for about 2-3 hours straight - must have been taking some sort of essay exam.
It was nice getting the bigger lockers, and being checked in first, though, when it was announced that my exam time slot was 9 hours. 🙂
How have you responded to Sophie Curriers request for extra time to express milk?
As the papers filed in court show, NBME offered Ms. Currier a variety of comfort measures and personal item exceptions, such as permission to bring multiple, assembled pumps to eliminate the time involved in cleaning, assembling, and disassembling them; permission to pump milk while taking the test and on break time, with privacy within the constraints of exam security, in the individual testing room that she receives on account of her ADA disability. We also provided her with a sample schedule demonstrating how an examinee can flexibly manage the time to take a 20- to 30-minute break every three hours.
One last thing though: I don't like that the NBME is using the fact that no one has ever requested accommodations before... I'm sure many nursing moms would have liked accomodations, but didn't push it because we either thought it wasn't worth the trouble, were too shy to "rock the boat", or because we didn't want the mention of "unusual test conditions" or something similar on our test report (that was the main factor for me when I was in her situation for Step 1). Not because it was easy and not a problem.
The only thing that is not very practical about the NBME response is the piece about bringing several pumps, since those babies (the good ones) cost a good $200-300 a piece. But even a single pump would work: if she can pump during test time, then she can clean up during break time...
What's so wrong with taking some time off when you are a new, nursing mother? The bigger issue is maternity leave in America, but that's a whole other can'o'worms.
I'm not siding with Ms. Currie and I know that there are plenty of women who juggle work and family admirably but I'm peeved by some of the attitudes on this forum that women who decide to have children are being shellfish and are just trying to get exceptions at work so that they can be lazy. Just because a women needs to take one or two years out of her life to have a child doesn't mean that she can't pursue a lifelong career like medicine. The comments, such as those by Dr. Cox, that pregnant women should be treated the same as men for the sake of social justice get an are just plain ridiculous and callous.
The issue isn't social justice. The issue is that we don't care about your personal life, and we don't want to do extra work to facilitate your life choices. You see, every time a resident takes maternity leave, the patients don't magically get put on hold, they get covered by the residents who aren't pregnant, breast feeding, tending to their emotional needs, finding themselves, etc.
You want a baby? Great, hold off on residency. But don't get pregnant and expect me to do your work for a while, then swoop back in and pick up where you left off. Your baby doesn't concern me, don't make your problem mine.
I'm not siding with Ms. Currie and I know that there are plenty of women who juggle work and family admirably but I'm peeved by some of the attitudes on this forum that women who decide to have children are being shellfish and are just trying to get exceptions at work so that they can be lazy. Just because a women needs to take one or two years out of her life to have a child doesn't mean that she can't pursue a lifelong career like medicine. The comments, such as those by Dr. Cox, that pregnant women should be treated the same as men for the sake of social justice get an are just plain ridiculous and callous.
I'm sure its sucks when you have to do extra work, but is it any different than when one of your co-workers gets sick or has surgery and has to stay home?
You make it sound like it's an easy thing to work around, like planning a vacation. While women have some choice in the matter, the choices aren't great: Either 1) Never have children or 2) Have children during your training or wait until you're in the age when there's a significantly high risk for birth defects.
These are decisions that men will never have to make in their lives. A little sensitivity is all I ask. Should only men be allowed to work in medicine because they don't have child rearing responsibilities?
I'm sure its sucks when you have to do extra work, but is it any different than when one of your co-workers gets sick or has surgery and has to stay home?
Well, as many males on this forum have pointed out there is no reason for women to get "special" considerations while experiencing the additional physical and emotional burdens of being pregnant. I mean if a man can do surgery for eights hours straight, then it's ridiculous to think a nine month pregnant woman should require "concessions". I'm mean it's just plain lazy. In fact, a female physician should pop out a baby, hand it to the nurse, and get back on rounds. Of course, women working in "men's" professions such as medicine should not even have babies, after all nobody "has" to have children. Why should you get maternity leave to provide the bonding a human baby needs in order to properly develop?
What? Where? She said no such thing. Dr. Cox said she found the comments in response to articles (particularly the ABC one) enlightening. It is something I would say though. Either women are equal to men or they are not. Which is it? In fact you can pick. Yes I mean it, seriously, go ahead and choose. Either choice is fine. The thing is, you can't have it both ways, you can't be equal in some instances and not in others.The comments, such as those by Dr. Cox, that pregnant women should be treated the same as men for the sake of social justice get an are just plain ridiculous and callous.
Exactly, I couldn't have said it better myself.The issue isn't social justice. The issue is that we don't care about your personal life, and we don't want to do extra work to facilitate your life choices.
Yes, it is different, for at least two reasons:
1) People generally don't choose to be sick or have surgery.
2) If you are sick, you miss maybe 3 days of work. If you have major surgery, you might be out for a week or two. This is far less than "taking one or two years out of her life to have a child" as you had said in a previous post.
The fact of the matter is that every year, hundreds, if not thousands, of women in the US do choose to have babies during residency and complete the requirements of their training.
Either women are equal to men or they are not. Which is it? In fact you can pick. Yes I mean it, seriously, go ahead and choose. Either choice is fine. The thing is, you can't have it both ways, you can't be equal in some instances and not in others.
Well then, I guess that women aren't equal to men because they require maternity leave. Why is this an equality issue? It's a difference, it exists. I don't think we can just ignore it and say "Well that's equality."
Viewing women as 'lazy', never. Viewing them as 'selfish and a nuisance', a certain few.All I ask is that our male co-workers look on it with a little bit of understanding rather than just viewing women as lazy, selfish and a nuisance in the work place.
Just because a women needs to take one or two years out of her life to have a child doesn't mean that she can't pursue a lifelong career like medicine.
Neat, so men don't have any interest in spending time with their kids? I wonder how my program would take it if I asked for paternity leave.