New MSAR says UCLA MCAT is 508?

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
TheBiologist

TheBiologist

Full Member
7+ Year Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2015
Messages
1,225
Reaction score
1,144
Is this significantly lower than in previous years?
Members don't see this ad.
 
I don't have access to MSAR anymore, but are your sure this is Geffen and not Drew? IFAIK those are separate. Otherwise yes, that would be a pretty substantial decrease for Geffen.
 
TheBiologist said:
Is this significantly lower than in previous years?
Click to expand...
Median applicant????????

EDIT: I just looked at MSAR. Wow! What a different format! And you're right...median acceptee is 508; median matriculant is 505! there are DO schools with higher MCAT scores! it may be that Drew is included in the overall number. I wonder if the wise @gyngyn can shed some light on this?
 
Last edited:
Members don't see this ad :)
md-2020 said:
I don't have access to MSAR anymore, but are your sure this is Geffen and not Drew? IFAIK those are separate. Otherwise yes, that would be a pretty substantial decrease for Geffen.
Click to expand...
yup, Geffen
 
Goro said:
Median applicant????????

EDIT: I just looked at MSAR. Wow! What a different format! And you're right...median acceptee is 508; median matriculant is 505! there are DO schools with higher MCAT scores! it may be that Drew is included in the overall number. I wonder if the wise @gyngyn can shed some light on this?
Click to expand...
Wouldn't that mean Drew is taking many applicants with <500 MCAT??? I guess they really are doing a holistic view at UCLA.
 
Drew has a class of ~26 students. Geffen has a class of ~180. If it is the case that Drew is lumped into the Geffen Stats, the Drew class size is not sufficient to explain the significance of the drop in UCLAs median MCAT.

They might just be one of 3 schools that actually bought the AAMC's suggestion to pay attention to the middle of the distribution. Their IQR is 503-517 so they definitely considered applicants from all over the stats pool, not just those at the top 3% like its peers in the USNWR rankings.

Good for you LA!
 
Looks like UCLA didn't get the holding pattern memo like UCSD/UCSF, and actually listened to the AAMC.

It will be very interesting to see whether they keep enrolling classes with a median of 28, or if they quickly shoot up after being left so far behind for the year.
 
efle said:
Looks like UCLA didn't get the holding pattern memo like UCSD/UCSF, and actually listened to the AAMC.

It will be very interesting to see whether they keep enrolling classes with a median of 28, or if they quickly shoot up after being left so far behind for the year.
Click to expand...
What is the "holding pattern memo"?
I wish UCLA keeps this way, considering applicants holistically!
 
DameJulie said:
What is the "holding pattern memo"?
I wish UCLA keeps this way, considering applicants holistically!
Click to expand...
I mean that none of the other schools actually changed their behavior regarding the MCAT at all, they kept taking all people from the top 5-10%

UCLA alone dropped way down
 
Members don't see this ad :)
efle said:
Looks like UCLA didn't get the holding pattern memo like UCSD/UCSF, and actually listened to the AAMC.

It will be very interesting to see whether they keep enrolling classes with a median of 28, or if they quickly shoot up after being left so far behind for the year.
Click to expand...
...508 is a 28? Uhh
 
softball2344 said:
Maybe they reported it wrong?
Click to expand...
They'd have to report the wrong values for 10th, 25th, median, 75th and 100th

And actually I don't know that it gets reported? It might be something taken directly from the AAMC's own AMCAS data - they can see the scores of everyone applying to every school.
 
Maybe UCLA has some pre med programs with conditional acceptances or they accept a lot of students from and that drops the MCAT median? Idk how students in those programs typically perform on the MCAT though, I just know the gpa requirements are typically pretty low
 
It'll be interesting to see how this class performs on step 1. If they achieve similar results to prior classes, then other highly ranked schools may follow suit.

This is certainly a bold move!
 
efle said:
I seem to recall reading somewhere that yes, the MSAR values include both. But Drew is so much smaller of a group it can't be moving the median more than a couple points.
Click to expand...


Gotcha. Yeah, I think there's 28-35 in that group. If all of their MCATs were 505 ish, I wonder how that would explain things.
 
Lucca said:
Drew has a class of ~26 students. Geffen has a class of ~180. If it is the case that Drew is lumped into the Geffen Stats, the Drew class size is not sufficient to explain the significance of the drop in UCLAs median MCAT.

They might just be one of 3 schools that actually bought the AAMC's suggestion to pay attention to the middle of the distribution. Their IQR is 503-517 so they definitely considered applicants from all over the stats pool, not just those at the top 3% like its peers in the USNWR rankings.

Good for you LA!
Click to expand...

What are the other two schools?
 
Lucca said:
Drew has a class of ~26 students. Geffen has a class of ~180. If it is the case that Drew is lumped into the Geffen Stats, the Drew class size is not sufficient to explain the significance of the drop in UCLAs median MCAT.

They might just be one of 3 schools that actually bought the AAMC's suggestion to pay attention to the middle of the distribution. Their IQR is 503-517 so they definitely considered applicants from all over the stats pool, not just those at the top 3% like its peers in the USNWR rankings.

Good for you LA!
Click to expand...

I would say that UCLA, on average, definitely has a more holistic approach to admissions than our peers (with a large emphasis on personal story, extracurriculars, LORs, and MMIs)

nevertheless, im still surprised at this new average, as it is quite lower than the past years (IIRC, our average was like 34 two years ago) so maybe there's some error (or not, who knows). and also our total class is ~180, with 130 pure md geffen, ~20drew, ~20prime, and ~12 mstp's fyi.
 
bluemachine said:
I would say that UCLA, on average, definitely has a more holistic approach to admissions than our peers (with a large emphasis on personal story, extracurriculars, LORs, and MMIs)

nevertheless, im still surprised at this new average, as it is quite lower than the past years (IIRC, our average was like 34 two years ago) so maybe there's some error (or not, who knows). and also our total class is ~180, with 130 pure md geffen, ~20drew, ~20prime, and ~12 mstp's fyi.
Click to expand...

Hmm, could it really be a mistake? I mean, google says UCLA's average MCAT score is 516 :shrug: I don't know...but I hope it's true!
 
It's actually kind of crazy to think about, that the boundary for top 10% at U of Washington and bottom 10% at Vanderbilt ... are the same number.
 
Opportunity14 said:
Look at duke"s 10th percentile it's 499 and median 513! That's a 24!!!
Click to expand...
a 513 is not a 24! it's like a 33/34, about 90th%. perhaps still low for a tier 1 school

and way to semi-necrobump my thread lol
 
Next step: get rid of the stupid test
 
TheBiologist said:
a 513 is not a 24! it's like a 33/34, about 90th%. perhaps still low for a tier 1 school

and way to semi-necrobump my thread lol
Click to expand...
The 499 is the 24

It's pretty crazy to think there are a dozen students at Duke with MCATs below what the AAMC even says predicts success!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

0
How Accurate is MSAR for Coursework Requirements?
Replies
9
Views
861
Med Ed
Med Ed
Mr.Smile12
2025-2026 AMCAS MSAR Reports / Discussions
Replies
0
Views
522
Mr.Smile12
Mr.Smile12
H
WAMC Help gpa 3.8+ MCAT 508
Replies
5
Views
853
Faha
F
T
WAMC/School list help: CA ORM, 508 MCAT
Replies
2
Views
438
Mr.Smile12
Mr.Smile12
W
MSAR Letter of Intent/Interest Description
Replies
2
Views
772
Waitlistno2
W
Top