- Joined
- Aug 30, 2007
- Messages
- 283
- Reaction score
- 1
So my next paper is being published June 1st.
Just found out that there is going to be a commentary based on the paper in the same volume. On top of that, the commentary is being written by one of the leading investigators in my field... someone who's papers I've been reading since I got started.
I'm not sure how I feel about this. I mean, I'm intrigued because I think the work is going to have a substantial impact on the field... not only that they are devoting a commentary to it, but also considering who it is being written by.
I just don't know if the content is going to be supportive, or if they are going to come out in opposition. The work is sound though, so even if they are critical of the report, at least they are going to have to do some work to disprove it.
Anybody else have any similar experiences?
Just found out that there is going to be a commentary based on the paper in the same volume. On top of that, the commentary is being written by one of the leading investigators in my field... someone who's papers I've been reading since I got started.
I'm not sure how I feel about this. I mean, I'm intrigued because I think the work is going to have a substantial impact on the field... not only that they are devoting a commentary to it, but also considering who it is being written by.
I just don't know if the content is going to be supportive, or if they are going to come out in opposition. The work is sound though, so even if they are critical of the report, at least they are going to have to do some work to disprove it.
Anybody else have any similar experiences?