Here's one:
National Health Service Corps Funding Squeezes Providers
By Stephen Lewis, CSRHA
When the New York Times recently ran an article about reduced funding in the National Health Service Corps (NHSC) Loan Repayment Program, it resonated strongly throughout rural California. California's safety net hospitals and clinics, particularly those in rural communities, rely heavily on the NHSC as a source for the physicians, dentists, and other health professionals who provide their health care services. As of March 2000, 45 rural California facilities employed 65 clinicians under scholarships or education loan repayment funded through NHSC. For most of these facilities it is difficult, if not impossible, to recruit clinical personnel without the incentive of NHSC loan repayment or scholarships. The threat of continued limited funding for these programs is a direct threat to the viability of such facilities and the health of the communities they serve.
The Times report (July 30) described the experiences of recent medical school graduates who had committed to work in safety-net facilities, in anticipation of having their education loans repaid by NHSC. These sites are often in locations that are generally considered unappealing, like inner-city neighborhoods or isolated rural communities. More importantly, safety net facilities often cannot pay as much as the clinician could earn in other practice settings. When the loan repayment funding did not come through, these young physicians found themselves without loan repayment assistance, in a practice setting where their incomes were unlikely to meet repayment schedules. While many of these clinicians may feel a commitment to treat medically underserved populations, the economic reality may be that they cannot afford to do so. The implications for the recruitment and retention efforts of rural facilities are potentially serious.
Precisely because this is a serious issue, it is important not to read more into the Times article than is actually there. The physicians quoted in the article give the impression they had a commitment from NHSC to repay their education loans if they agreed to work in eligible safety-net facilities. However, as Sonia M. Leon Reig, spokesperson for the program, points out, their applications do not guarantee payment. With flat funding and increased demand for the program, only about 40% of applicants are accepted, and selection is based on a number of criteria in addition to the work setting. Factors such as passage of relevant board examinations, the individual's compatibility with the work setting (e.g. cultural/language competence), and the likelihood of remaining in that setting at the end of the NHSC obligation are important in choosing program participants.