No thoracic facet procedures per Carelon guidelines

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

Agast

Full Member
10+ Year Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2009
Messages
4,583
Reaction score
5,753
First time I’ve run into this

I’m fairly certain the patient has thoracic facet joint pain. However all MBB/facet joint procedures are considered experimental at the thoracic level per the guidelines his insurance uses. Does that mean cash pay only or is there some way around this

Members don't see this ad.
 
Members don't see this ad :)
Diagnostic small joint injection?

Guy works a low paying job so cash pay is not an option
 
I think he’s being sarcastic
 
I assume that’s sarcasm. Pls don’t do that. One day the fraud is for the patients benefit, the next day it’s for yours. Knee pain? OA=Crps. Scs! I see the stuff all the time around where I work

Not your fault insurance rules.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
I’d rather bill a small/medium joint injection. Technically not wrong.
 
I’d rather bill a small/medium joint injection. Technically not wrong.
Is this correct? I've been denied virtually all thoracic facet injections I've ordered, and I quit ordering them yrs ago because of it. Can you bill an MBB as a small/medium joint injection? If so, I'll do therapeutic MBB with dexamethasone.
 
Is this correct? I've been denied virtually all thoracic facet injections I've ordered, and I quit ordering them yrs ago because of it. Can you bill an MBB as a small/medium joint injection? If so, I'll do therapeutic MBB with dexamethasone.

Can you - probably not

But joint injections don’t require prior auth and bill very little…so it probably doesn’t attract the same scrutiny
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
I actually had a P2P with a Carelon doctor for thoracic MBB. She approved it on the face of pt had tried everything else, but did say I'd probably have to go through the same process again for the second MBB and again for the RFA, each time the result being dependent on the reviewer. Probably not worth it at that point...
 
  • Like
  • Sad
Reactions: 2 users
Members don't see this ad :)
I actually had a P2P with a Carelon doctor for thoracic MBB. She approved it on the face of pt had tried everything else, but did say I'd probably have to go through the same process again for the second MBB and again for the RFA, each time the result being dependent on the reviewer. Probably not worth it at that point...

They probably threw her into the dungeon afterwards to punish her and warn the other reviewers
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
They probably threw her into the dungeon afterwards to punish her and warn the other reviewers
Yes probably. I was up front with pt that even though we got this one approved we still have an uphill fight and may end up with no choice but to offer cash price for the RFA, even if the diagnostics work.
 
I do this all the time for lumbar mbb- when I palpate, I have to change levels.
Once I guessed T7-9 and ended up doing T10-12.

But yes, potential fraud.
Luckily, have not run into thoracic facets denied in midwest- encountered a lot in NC
Changing levels for the relevant CPT code is not an issue, happens all the time, but Getting approval for cervical medial branch block, and then doing thoracic, even the same CPT code is definitely fraud.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Changing levels for the relevant CPT code is not an issue, happens all the time, but Getting approval for cervical medial branch block, and then doing thoracic, even the same CPT code is definitely fraud.

Yep. Most of the time, If insurance doesn’t cover it, the patient just has to pay cash, period.

The only times I will bend the rules is if is a very slight modification that can’t bite me later.

Such as including TON lesion on a patient whose insurance doesn’t cover that but does cover its neighbor C3. I do a “thorough “ C3 lesion which helps the patient with their cerviogenic headaches.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
yes, you can use flouroscopy for confirmation of the level to be targetted. that is not bending or breaking the rules.

just make sure your consent reflects this.

and like buddababa stated, dont change section of the body
 
Yep. Most of the time, If insurance doesn’t cover it, the patient just has to pay cash, period.

The only times I will bend the rules is if is a very slight modification that can’t bite me later.

Such as including TON lesion on a patient whose insurance doesn’t cover that but does cover its neighbor C3. I do a “thorough “ C3 lesion which helps the patient with their cerviogenic headaches.
I just "ablate the C2 medial branch"
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
Top