-
CycleTrack and SDN are teaming up to make medical school admissions more transparent and accessible! Read the announcement to learn how we’re supporting the future of CycleTrack’s free application-tracking tools .
Nomenclature, cyclohexene priority
Started by babowc
Get help with your application
Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.
This alkene is 1-methyl-6-nitrocyclohexene,
but why can't it be 2/3 instead? I thought lowest # total is preferred?
Always number the chain that gets you closest to the first sub. 1 C - methyl > 2 C methyl.
what you said is true, but only if you have multiple ways to number the chain (aka, same length and same distance to the first sub.)
This always confused me...
so we're numbering 1-6 in CC direction.
what do you mean by "what you said is true, but only if you have multiple ways to number the chain (aka, same length and same distance to the first sub."
Thanks alot, you're a great help!
so we're numbering 1-6 in CC direction.
what do you mean by "what you said is true, but only if you have multiple ways to number the chain (aka, same length and same distance to the first sub."
Thanks alot, you're a great help!
First thing first, find the longest chain, then apply what I said from the previous post, number the chain in such a way that will get you closest to the first sub.
After applying the first 2 rule, if you still have multiple ways to number that chain (aka if they're equal distance to their first sub), THAT's when you try to get the lowest numbers to the subs.
So I worked this problem out without thinking about it too much.
This is how I concluded:
-Named it as cyclohexene
-Started with the carbon that is substituted first (the vinylic methyl)
-#ed around until I included the nitro group
I got: 1-methyl-6-nitrocyclohexene
I can see the confusion. And I agree, lowest priority wins. However, in this case you have the first carbon of the chain with a substituent, and from my understanding that gets the first priority. Hope this helps
This is how I concluded:
-Named it as cyclohexene
-Started with the carbon that is substituted first (the vinylic methyl)
-#ed around until I included the nitro group
I got: 1-methyl-6-nitrocyclohexene
I can see the confusion. And I agree, lowest priority wins. However, in this case you have the first carbon of the chain with a substituent, and from my understanding that gets the first priority. Hope this helps
You start numbering from the double bond. Double bond gets the priority. Since a methyl group is atrached to a carbon with a double bond ( vinylic carbon), you start numbering from this carbon, then the second carbon is the one that is double bonded to the first carbon. You go on from there. Hope this helps. Good luck.
Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk
Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk
