- Joined
- Jun 4, 2016
- Messages
- 682
- Reaction score
- 1,419
Would not doing any away rotations harm you if you were an otherwise cookie-cutter applicant for dermatology (i.e. high board scores, many clinical Honors, tons of research, etc)?
I'm so sick and tired of these millennials these days wanting the best but not willing to put in anything to get it. None of you are entitled to ****
Yes it absolutely would. What is with so many people not wanting to do away rotations anymore? If it's about the extra work, then you are lazy and don't deserve to match to even the worst derm program, step scores and research be damned. If it's about the money, I'm sorry but suck it up and take out more loans, or don't apply to derm (or a surgical subspecialty). Nobody is making you go into these fields. If that's what you want to do, then shut up and do whatever it takes. I'm so sick and tired of these millennials these days wanting the best but not willing to put in anything to get it. None of you are entitled to ****
Not doing aways is reserved for the 260+ club, sorry.
I think they are waste of money (lots of money) but part of the game for competitive specialities. If they are so essential, why doesn't every speciality require it. It seems to me students do it more to increase their chances since there are only a limited number of programs and doing well or sucking up at a program can guarantee a spot there in midst of all the competition. I don't see a reason to not do them other than money. I doubt that if you suck at them that people will spread the word that you are bad.
I personally think it's pretty easy to do an IM away rotation after so much exposure to IM. But doing aways in surgical subspecialties where you have minimal knowledge is hard and a waste of money other than to increase your chances in the match
Aways are the number one or two consideration in ortho when PDs look at candidates. They're all but a prerequisite. I think YMMV with other specialities.
Yes it absolutely would. What is with so many people not wanting to do away rotations anymore? If it's about the extra work, then you are lazy and don't deserve to match to even the worst derm program, step scores and research be damned. If it's about the money, I'm sorry but suck it up and take out more loans, or don't apply to derm (or a surgical subspecialty). Nobody is making you go into these fields. If that's what you want to do, then shut up and do whatever it takes. I'm so sick and tired of these millennials these days wanting the best but not willing to put in anything to get it. None of you are entitled to ****
I lol'd at this. But then thought it maybe isn't a joke? Go look at Foot Fetish's post history on here before you spout this holier than thou nonsense. If there's any truth to the amount of work they put into doing well on boards, they have a superlative work ethic.Yes it absolutely would. What is with so many people not wanting to do away rotations anymore? If it's about the extra work, then you are lazy and don't deserve to match to even the worst derm program, step scores and research be damned. If it's about the money, I'm sorry but suck it up and take out more loans, or don't apply to derm (or a surgical subspecialty). Nobody is making you go into these fields. If that's what you want to do, then shut up and do whatever it takes. I'm so sick and tired of these millennials these days wanting the best but not willing to put in anything to get it. None of you are entitled to ****
I agree. They are extremely important. I am just saying I don't think they should be. If they are so important, they should be mandated across every speciality. For me, away rotations seems to 1) to figure out if the program thinks you're a "fit" there 2) impress the program to increase your chances. Both these things apply to any speciality, but the competitive nature of surgical subspecialties makes aways essential as it can increase chances of matching pretty significantly if you do well, but I don't think they should be primarily because of exorbitant cost of doing aways.
Yes it absolutely would. What is with so many people not wanting to do away rotations anymore? If it's about the extra work, then you are lazy and don't deserve to match to even the worst derm program, step scores and research be damned. If it's about the money, I'm sorry but suck it up and take out more loans, or don't apply to derm (or a surgical subspecialty). Nobody is making you go into these fields. If that's what you want to do, then shut up and do whatever it takes. I'm so sick and tired of these millennials these days wanting the best but not willing to put in anything to get it. None of you are entitled to ****
Would not doing any away rotations harm you if you were an otherwise cookie-cutter applicant for dermatology (i.e. high board scores, many clinical Honors, tons of research, etc)?
If you're someone who is likely to look better on paper than in person, then no, it probably wouldn't hurt you. But if you perform well clinically and are likeable once people get to spend more than a few hours with you, it could probably help a great deal -- particularly if you take more than a few minutes to shine. Away rotations also give you the chance to make a favorable impression on a program that could otherwise be just a bit out of reach.
That's what I had been told in the past. I would definitely consider my irl personality a benefit, as I find that I almost always end up being well-liked in work settings, whether it's in a fast food restaurant or in clinic...but here is my main hesitation: Is the only purpose of aways to have a better shot at the 1-3 programs you do your aways at? I fail to see how that would confer a big advantage to someone who plans on applying to 100+ programs anyway...especially if it's the case that aways are not reported on ERAs. Indeed, it sounds like, with the exception of a few specialties, of which i am not yet convinced derm is one, aways are NOT the med school equivalent of shadowing as a premed (i.e. a check-box item that programs like to see)...it's more of a targeted effort at individual programs. If this is the case, I might just skip the aways unless it's really, really, really obvious that a certain program that im interested in preferentially interviews rotators...but even then, to my original point, you cant feasibly rotate at all such programs.
I lol'd at this. But then thought it maybe isn't a joke? Go look at Foot Fetish's post history on here before you spout this holier than thou nonsense. If there's any truth to the amount of work they put into doing well on boards, they have a superlative work ethic.
confirmation bias is rampantYou gotta love the folks that come on here asking people for advice and then ignore all of it anyway
That's what I had been told in the past. I would definitely consider my irl personality a benefit, as I find that I almost always end up being well-liked in work settings, whether it's in a fast food restaurant or in clinic...but here is my main hesitation: Is the only purpose of aways to have a better shot at the 1-3 programs you do your aways at? I fail to see how that would confer a big advantage to someone who plans on applying to 100+ programs anyway...especially if it's the case that aways are not reported on ERAs. Indeed, it sounds like, with the exception of a few specialties, of which i am not yet convinced derm is one, aways are NOT the med school equivalent of shadowing as a premed (i.e. a check-box item that programs like to see)...it's more of a targeted effort at individual programs. If this is the case, I might just skip the aways unless it's really, really, really obvious that a certain program that im interested in preferentially interviews rotators...but even then, to my original point, you cant feasibly rotate at all such programs.
You gotta love the folks that come on here asking people for advice and then ignore all of it anyway
I think that's a very reasonable question -- and to be honest, I think you have a point. OK, so if you're going for Derm, you will need to apply to a gazillion programs -- just fact of life. And if you're a cookie-cutter applicant of average strength, then you'll reasonably get between 5 and 25 interview invitations from those near-random applications. If you get only 5, then Yikes! Panic time! If you get 25, then you're almost certainly OK. Trouble is, you won't know whether it's 5 or 25 until it's far too late to do anything about it.
If you do 3 away rotations, that's 3 interviews you're nearly assured of getting -- so that's a real plus. You'll also know how you feel about those particular programs and whether you want to rank them high, medium or low -- another real plus when otherwise, you'll have little to go on. If people like you IRL, then you'll probably also have 3 fairly good shots at matching, which, in a field like Derm, is no small benefit - particularly for a candidate who does not necessarily 'stand out' on paper. From a program's perspective, wouldn't they rather select someone they know they like than someone who seems good in a interview but might not 'age' well in real life? You'll also come away from your rotations with useful information -- Things like what you do and do not like about the programs you rotated at. Things that will enable you to ask intelligent questions and also give intelligent answers in your interviews.
I know it probably seems like just another hoop to jump through. I'd just be very scared to forego what might be your best shot at securing the residencies you most want. Select your aways carefully, targeting programs for which you are a strong enough applicant that they won't ignore you for a 'better-on-paper' student even if they do like you.
Great answer. Exactly why I am doing aways. I do think part of it is hoops to jump through because people of other specialities are still happy at their respective programs without doing away rotations. But the fact that surgical programs are small sized can be spun into an argument as to why they are more important. Regardless, I think people will be just fine without doing away rotations if they were to go removed from the application process but they will persist because of the advantages you described although the cost is a money sink.I think that's a very reasonable question -- and to be honest, I think you have a point. OK, so if you're going for Derm, you will need to apply to a gazillion programs -- just fact of life. And if you're a cookie-cutter applicant of average strength, then you'll reasonably get between 5 and 25 interview invitations from those near-random applications. If you get only 5, then Yikes! Panic time! If you get 25, then you're almost certainly OK. Trouble is, you won't know whether it's 5 or 25 until it's far too late to do anything about it.
If you do 3 away rotations, that's 3 interviews you're nearly assured of getting -- so that's a real plus. You'll also know how you feel about those particular programs and whether you want to rank them high, medium or low -- another real plus when otherwise, you'll have little to go on. If people like you IRL, then you'll probably also have 3 fairly good shots at matching, which, in a field like Derm, is no small benefit - particularly for a candidate who does not necessarily 'stand out' on paper. From a program's perspective, wouldn't they rather select someone they know they like than someone who seems good in a interview but might not 'age' well in real life? You'll also come away from your rotations with useful information -- Things like what you do and do not like about the programs you rotated at. Things that will enable you to ask intelligent questions and also give intelligent answers in your interviews.
I know it probably seems like just another hoop to jump through. I'd just be very scared to forego what might be your best shot at securing the residencies you most want. Select your aways carefully, targeting programs for which you are a strong enough applicant that they won't ignore you for a 'better-on-paper' student even if they do like you.
We wouldn't be SDN without them, would we?You gotta love the folks that come on here asking people for advice and then ignore all of it anyway
That's what I had been told in the past. I would definitely consider my irl personality a benefit, as I find that I almost always end up being well-liked in work settings, whether it's in a fast food restaurant or in clinic...but here is my main hesitation: Is the only purpose of aways to have a better shot at the 1-3 programs you do your aways at? I fail to see how that would confer a big advantage to someone who plans on applying to 100+ programs anyway...especially if it's the case that aways are not reported on ERAs. Indeed, it sounds like, with the exception of a few specialties, of which i am not yet convinced derm is one, aways are NOT the med school equivalent of shadowing as a premed (i.e. a check-box item that programs like to see)...it's more of a targeted effort at individual programs. If this is the case, I might just skip the aways unless it's really, really, really obvious that a certain program that im interested in preferentially interviews rotators...but even then, to my original point, you cant feasibly rotate at all such programs.
Have you talked with your home derm program director or chair? What is their opinion?
I know in most surgical subspecialties it is not just about looking good to the 2-3 programs you rotate at. We expect students to learn about our field and they get hardly any exposure as M3s or 4s. It is a chance to get LORs; most people in my field do not care about a LOR from anybody outside of people practicing in our field in academics, and most people know each other. Almost every interview I went on, the first question was, "where'd you do aways?" and it was a starting point to discuss what you are looking for in a program and what you find interesting in the field.
Thanks for the reply. I did talk to my school's derm advisor, who basically had 3 key messages for me:
A) Aways can be helpful if you're likeable, which he thought I was.
B) Aways can be harmful if you're not likeable.
C) Aways may be unnecessary if I was sure that I wanted to stay at my home program.
Not sure what, if anything, they were insinuating with point C, but I would like to think it was a way of saying I have a good shot at my home program?
But then when I spoke to the derm residents, they made it seem like aways are an expectation...so the issue of aways is still a bit unclear in terms of derm-specific value.
Have you talked with your home derm program director or chair? What is their opinion?
I know in most surgical subspecialties it is not just about looking good to the 2-3 programs you rotate at. We expect students to learn about our field and they get hardly any exposure as M3s or 4s. It is a chance to get LORs; most people in my field do not care about a LOR from anybody outside of people practicing in our field in academics, and most people know each other. Almost every interview I went on, the first question was, "where'd you do aways?" and it was a starting point to discuss what you are looking for in a program and what you find interesting in the field.
Thanks for the reply. I did talk to my school's derm advisor, who basically had 3 key messages for me:
A) Aways can be helpful if you're likeable, which he thought I was.
B) Aways can be harmful if you're not likeable.
C) Aways may be unnecessary if I was sure that I wanted to stay at my home program.
Not sure what, if anything, they were insinuating with point C, but I would like to think it was a way of saying I have a good shot at my home program?
But then when I spoke to the derm residents, they made it seem like aways are an expectation...so the issue of aways is still a bit unclear in terms of derm-specific value.