In response - Study. Those of us who have taken it cannot give you any information other than what is published about the exam. The exam is HARD. I took 10 practice exams, 2 of the old PEAT (66.5%, 66%), 3 O'Sulivan exams (66%, 66%, 71%), 3 Scorebuilders exams (71%, 72%, 83%) and 2 more PEAT (the new one) exams (78%, 79%), I never RETOOK an exam. I passed the NPTE this July on the first try. I read the Scorebuilder's book cover to cover, the O'Sullivan book cover to cover and reviewed both missed and correct answers. You need to know how you study best. I started off in a large group and couldn't maintain my focus, I then started to study one on one - one on two, and found this was better FOR ME. The bulk of my studying was done by myself at home without other people or significant distraction. I focused on where I was weak and worked to increase my knowledge; my scores didn't start really improving until the week before the exam. Good Luck in OctoberHi all!
I hope you could offer me some important tips and advice in preparation for NPTE. Planning to take the exam in October. Thanks!! xx
hi,i am interested in study tips. do email me @ [email protected]sassy PT what is ur mail id . i am taking npte in july 22 nd 2014 i would like to share some tips for npte ,
Thanks for the tips. I am still reading textbooks because I could not understand reading reviewers.
im also reading textbooks first like sullivan, magee, and goodman bt not all chapters just the important ones.. what did u read @sassyPT
What do you consider "important ones"? The review books pull out much of the materials, if you have questions when studying that material, find the reference, find the answer to your question and get out of the reference book. There is not enough time to relearn everything you ever learned in PT school, my school was 33 months long, I had 12 weeks after graduation to review for the exam.
I would disagree about TherapyEd (O'sullivans) but it also depends on how you study/learn best. Between the two study books available (TherapyEd and Scorebuilders/Giles) I found therapyed much more helpful. It's presented in an outline format so going into it, you have to have some knowledge and background. But it touches on most things that the NPTE will focus on, but not everything. If there's anything you don't understand in therapy ed, just look it up, but it is a convenient place to find most of the answers or at least start. But it doesn't give you all the fluff that scorebuilders does. When you go through the practice exams, there are trends in the questions based on the body system and it'll help clue you in to what you should focus your studying on. Don't focus on the details and memorizing. Study broad and wide and find the clinical trends... when you review each practice test make sure to also understand what the question is asking and why the answer choice they chose is correct... it's usually a key word/s and on the NPTE make sure you answer the question asked, not what you think it could be implying --- overthinking will likely lead you to the wrong answer. At the end of the day, the NPTE is more about how good you are at taking their test. Best of luck to all October examineesBefore I share my experiences, a little about me. I got trained as PT in India and, have been out of field for a while pursuing other interests. I took NPTE July 2015 and got my results yesterday. I passed.
I picked up on a couple of things that might be helpful (specially if you were trained outside of US and more specifically in India) for getting in the right mindset. When I was in PT school the emphasis was always on memorizing stuff. You would write these essay type answers to exam that you would mug up. This is great of recalling stuff but not so good for assessing cases using ICF model and thinking clinically. Thinking clinically is the major difference in the training. Thats the one thing that NPTE psychometrics test. Memorizing information and applying it correctly are two different things and, I would recommend focusing on application.
Now on to some more specific stuff, I brought the Sullivan NPTE book and started going through it 3 weeks before the test. I got very frustrated with the book because the way the information is presented is fragmented. There is no explanation and that does not work for me. I ditched the book (well I mean I just used it to identify topics) and went to textbooks. I focused on Biomechanics (not ortho) and on Anatomy and Physiology (cardio-resp and neuro both). I know that this sounds like a very short time but I was devoting close to 8 hours/day. So instead of focusing on the clinical conditions focus was on fundamentals.
In addition, I would recommend practicing reasoning both inductive and deductive. Sullivan has a neat explanation of this in their book. Read the questions very carefully and, use the fundamental concepts that you should be able to apply not just recall and thinking critically is what will do the trick.
One last thing, the books that I used were Norkins- Biomehcanics, some random book on anatomy and physiology that I found in the library, Sullivan - Physical Rehab, Cameron - electro (although I did not focus much on electro), and the only thing that I found the Sullivan NPTE book useful for was the tests (I took 1 sullivan and 1 PEAT) and for reading up on professional standards and ethics and roles and responsibilities (I don't believe we have the same standards outside of the US)
Hopefully this helps. All the best to everyone who is preparing for October.