NRMP fiasco: Dr. Paul Jung was right

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

futuredoc15

Membership Revoked
Removed
10+ Year Member
Joined
Feb 13, 2011
Messages
110
Reaction score
1
On May 7, 2002, resident physicians filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia alleging that the National Residency Matching Program (the “Match”), the American Council for Graduate Medical Education (“ACGME”), and numerous hospitals and universities violated the Sherman antitrust act by displacing competition in the “recruitment, hiring, employment and compensation of resident physicians” and by imposing “a scheme of restraints which have the purpose and effect of fixing, artificially depressing, standardizing and stabilizing resident physician compensation and other terms of employment.
More here: http://www.law.uh.edu/healthlaw/perspectives/(MT)Jung3.pdf
Comment:
IMO the granting on an antitrust exemption to the NRMP is a complete travesty. I believe we now have an unopposed and abusive monopoly that can't even perform the scramble properly as illustrated by the fiasco today.
 
Here is the AAMC revenue from the 2008 form 990:
ERAS - 39,873,616
AMCAS - 20,443, 639
MCAT - 13,847,638

reference page 50 of http://www.guidestar.org/FinDocuments/2009/362/169/2009-362169124-05b05eff-9.pdf

Here is what these AAMC fatcats are raking in off the backs of students in total compensation (see page 30 of same reference) :
Darrell Kirch MD 848,294
Carol Aschenbrenner MD 563,819
Robert Jones PhD 421, 702
Atul Grover MD PhD 275,266
Richard Knapp PhD 506576
Joseph Keyes JR JD 388,575
Kathleen Turner 330,944
Elisa Seigel 322,369
Jeanne Mella 287,057
Charles Terrell 243,918
David Korn MD 463,782
Robert Dickler 446,267
Barbara Freidman 423,375
David Davis MD 340,751
Daniel Hunt MD 313,065

This is utterly despicable and contemptable IMO.
 
Last edited:
On May 7, 2002, resident physicians filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia alleging that the National Residency Matching Program (the “Match”), the American Council for Graduate Medical Education (“ACGME”), and numerous hospitals and universities violated the Sherman antitrust act by displacing competition in the “recruitment, hiring, employment and compensation of resident physicians” and by imposing “a scheme of restraints which have the purpose and effect of fixing, artificially depressing, standardizing and stabilizing resident physician compensation and other terms of employment.
More here: http://www.law.uh.edu/healthlaw/perspectives/(MT)Jung3.pdf
Comment:
IMO the granting on an antitrust exemption to the NRMP is a complete travesty. I believe we now have an unopposed and abusive monopoly that can't even perform the scramble properly as illustrated by the fiasco today.

What happened in the scramble today?
 
Read that case review... pretty sickening. Well at least it makes it obvious that the ACGME is an anticompetitive monopoly when they have to pay a senator to add the exemption as a rider.

As for the money issue... one only has to look at Step 2 CS. $1000 for some out of work actors to fake wheezes and see how well I can speak my native language. I'm gonna guess that from the time I applied to medical school through my ultimate board certs, I bet the costs for apps, fees, tests, certs, etc. will be north of $10k. Along the way each little organization that has found a way to make a monopoly over med students finds a way to suck their little bit of blood.
 
As for the money issue... one only has to look at Step 2 CS. $1000 for some out of work actors to fake wheezes and see how well I can speak my native language. I'm gonna guess that from the time I applied to medical school through my ultimate board certs, I bet the costs for apps, fees, tests, certs, etc. will be north of $10k. Along the way each little organization that has found a way to make a monopoly over med students finds a way to suck their little bit of blood.

When I was a resident, I was talking with my program director one day and told my PD how it was a scam for money as far as obtaining board certification goes; I also stated what you have. My PD first dissented and said it wasn't a money play, but then, abruptly, agreed with me and said, "Yeah, it's a lot of money".
 
Here is the AAMC revenue from the 2008 form 990:
ERAS - 39,873,616
AMCAS - 20,443, 639
MCAT - 13,847,638

reference page 50 of http://www.guidestar.org/FinDocuments/2009/362/169/2009-362169124-05b05eff-9.pdf

Here is what these AAMC fatcats are raking in off the backs of students in total compensation (see page 30 of same reference) :
Darrell Kirch MD 848,294
Carol Aschenbrenner MD 563,819
Robert Jones PhD 421, 702
Atul Grover MD PhD 275,266
Richard Knapp PhD 506576
Joseph Keyes JR JD 388,575
Kathleen Turner 330,944
Elisa Seigel 322,369
Jeanne Mella 287,057
Charles Terrell 243,918
David Korn MD 463,782
Robert Dickler 446,267
Barbara Freidman 423,375
David Davis MD 340,751
Daniel Hunt MD 313,065

This is utterly despicable and contemptable IMO.



"Ethics, Professionalism, Integrity"....:laugh:
 
yea the NRMP is pretty powerful. They have absolutely no oversight. Just read the match agreement, it is very vague and unlike any employment application in the country. for example...if you make one mistake in the application process and are found guilty of a match violation, you can be sanctioned (not allowed to work at) ANY NRMP affiliated program for a period of time, even if you find a spot outside the match application process. Also, you can be banned from using the match, which is basically career ending considering they have a monopoly on residency positions. They have these powers, but don't specify anywhere what violations receive what punishments, and basically it says in the agreement they can punish how they see fit...If you commit a violation, a report is sent to anyone and everyone affiliated with medicine in the country.

And its not like they are doing this to people who really deserve it. You can get a violation for switching programs even if your program agrees and the program you are switching to agrees. I was permanently banned from the match for not reporting dismissed misdemeanor charges (underage alcohol ticket) from over 8 years ago on my interview day. I honestly didn't think I had to report something dismissed, and I later informed the program I made a mistake when I learned from the state license board that dismissed charges were reportable. There is nothing on my record, and the program only knew because I told them. How does someone get a residency with out going through the match? its possible but EXTREMELY difficult...When I finally recieved my final report and punishment, even the director who filed the waiver was shocked and disagreed with the NRMP's actions. He has since apologized on multiple occasions and even provided me with a letter of recommendation I understand why I lost my position at the program, but never in a million years did I expect a permanent ban.

So they are not only at odds with anti-trust, but also breaking several state and employment laws. People make mistakes, even physicians. Your career shouldn't be ended over one account over one violation. Furthermore, losing a residency position is already a big enough red flag for any program director. Banning applicants from the match is just overkill...

Check out who they report a violation to (which is also at odds with employment laws. It is illegal to solicit why someone got fired. It is the future employers right to find out, but the previous employer can't go out and tell everyone else in the country why you were fired).

(1)the applicant's medical school official, with a request that the report be placed in the applicant's permanent file (2) the Educational Commission for Foreign Medical Graduates if the applicant is a student/graduate of a foreign medical school
(3) the NRMP institutional official and the director of the program to which the applicant matched
(4) the NRMP institutional official and director of the program to which the applicant has applied or switched (if known)
(5) the party who originally reported the violation
(6) the NRMP Executive Committee
(7) the American Board of Medical Specialties
(8) the applicant's residency program director if the violation occurred in a fellowship match
(9) the Federation of State Medical Boards if the applicant is to be permanently identified as a match violator or has been permanently barred from future NRMP matches
(10) any parties whom the NRMP has determined are relevant to its investigation.
also It is against NRMP rules to train at any NRMP affiliated program if you are sanctioned for a violation. They define training as anything to maintain your clinical skills. So during my sanction I wasn't allowed to do research or rotate just for education purposes until my sanction was over!!!! Sounds unbelievable right?

I have been humbled by this experience and as physicians, our career can end at any moment because of one mistake. License boards, malpractice, etc etc can all bring your career to a screeching halt. I am fortunate enough that I went to a small medical school, where the attending's know me and know I'm a good honest hard working physician. Thanks to my home school connections, I actually now have a better residency position outside the match, and will probably be published at least 3 times by the end of the year. I've been blessed since the horrible summer when I was permanently banned, but not everyone is as lucky as I am.

Oh and guess what, they are currently pushing for 100% of pgy1 and pgy2 positions to go through the match (right now I think about 86% or so go through the match).

If you are interested in helping changing some things that are at odds with employment laws for future applicants, please sign our petition.

http://www.gopetition.com/petition/42979.html

The NRMP needs students to speak up.
 
Last edited:
Top